35
28
21
14
7
Szerencsetlen v2 :: FFR Batch Submission
ositzxz369 -
Szerencsetlen v2 -
Venetian Snares [7.5 / 10]
Jan/Feb 2022
PublicPurchasedSecretEvents
Released
Venetian Snares - is in the "Permissions List and Information v8" thread.
- The sim folder name isn't as expected: "Szerencsetlen (ositzxz369)" vs "Szerencsetlen v2 (ositzxz369)"
✔️ The stepauthor has acknowledged the judges notes.
Simfile Folder Name
Szerencsetlen (ositzxz369)Note Count
3001Chart Length
4:52Average NPS
10.3877Estimated Difficulty
91.2
First Note
0:03Ending Note Delay
0:01Hand Bias
x -53
Framers
0 - 0 1 - 0 2 - 31 3 - 47 4 - 77Jumps
x 598
Hands
x 115
Quads
x 1
Color Jumps
x 8
Color Hands
x 3
Color Quads
x 0
Most notes in:
1/3 of a Second9 - 27.00 nps 0.5 Seconds
13 - 26.00 nps 1 Second
24 - 24.00 nps 2 Seconds
42 - 21.00 nps 5 Seconds
94 - 18.80 nps 10 Seconds
179 - 17.90 nps 30 Seconds
501 - 16.70 nps 1 Minute
973 - 16.22 nps
Color Count
x 1091 (36.35%)
x 797 (26.56%)
x 44 (1.47%)
x 689 (22.96%)
x 35 (1.17%)
x 223 (7.43%)
x 42 (1.4%)
x 57 (1.9%)
x 23 (0.77%)
Posted at 8:20am on December 21st, 2022
Szerencsetlen (ositzxz369) [8/10]
PERMS OK
SYNC OK
58.690: These 32nds become very loud here, could warrant something different than a simple roll.
1:18.253: This is the only fade in/out where you don't use three sets of 2 8ths, should probably make this one consistent with the rest.
2:14.632: Could be a (23) for PR with 2:14.288.
2:20.063: Using a (34) here and moving the following 4th to (12) would be better PR and variety without being too spiky.
2:23.253: A bit odd to play. You could probably just make this a (123). Preference though.
2:25.667: This has so much going on in the background, and since what you layer doesnt have a clear transition at 2:29.115, it feels quite off/arbitrary to play. I would suggest either integrating some of the drums, or improving the transition out of the 24ths to get back on the drums emphasis.
2:35.322-3:13.943: This is a pretttty long break, a cut could be warranted.
3:32.563: These two last triplets are layered to a sound that is significantly different from the rising triplets before them. Would suggest using something different here.
4:28.770: The transition to the lower sound here is quite weak; there is just a single 431 that differs from the already pretty repetitive usage of 123 and 432. While it's ok to have these often as a general theme of the chart, they shouldn't blend in with too many different sounds.
This chart is solid. The breaks are a bit long for replayability but aside from that the inconsistencies are overall minor and the difficulty curve matches the song pretty well. While the rolly patterns are somewhat redundant by the end, they do have enough variety to simply be a theme for the chart.
Posted at 8:30am on December 21st, 2022
Szerencsetlen (ositzxz369)
- Offset's mostly fine.
*58.130 - This feels a bit too fast to use 32nds for this transition. Maybe try using 24ths until 58.374?
59.121&59.293 - Shouldn't share the same column as 58.949.
1:22.046 - You can mirror these patterns from here so that your column 3 wouldn't stack this long anchor.
1:55.150 - ughhhhhhhhhhhh I get why you did the hands for the cymbal crash but I'm not a fan of the implied cameljack. If the transition to the hand could be better....
*2:23.253 - A quad for this is a bit too much. Hand should fit nicely.
*So for the 2:25.667 it's a bit of a "take it or leave it" for me. I'm not exactly opposed for dumping the noise with 24ths here, but the main takeaway still exists with the instruments playing in the background, so it's a bit odd to play in general. Moreover, 2:29.288 left me confused with this change of layering pace, as the noise does still occur.
The next 2 minutes are pretty alright. Not too overbearing to play, but it's fine.
4:36.349 - What's with this colored 192nd for?
This file is quite nice, though I'm not the most fond of the patterns used in general. In some cases the 32nds used are mostly quite rolly, while it does make some sense to an extent, it could have felt it needed more pattern variation so it doesn't feel too slippery at times.
I initially gave this an FR for the *'d points above, but after giving this some more thought..... CR would be more appropriate. I encourage you to consider my points *'d above, as I think it kinda sticks out like a sore thumb. [7/10, Change Recommended]
Posted at 6:32pm on December 21st, 2022
xXOpkillerXx
58.690 - Changed. Recheck 58.690-58.776
2:23.253 - Like this? Recheck here
2:25.667 - Transition now acceptable? Recheck 2:28.770-2:29.115
3:32.563 - Changed. Recheck 3:32.563-3:32.908
4:28.770 - It's not just 123 and 432. The 431 leads up to the other patterns of 234 and 321.
Mipha
58.130 - Changed. Recheck 58.087-58.776
59.121&59.293 - Including 58.949, they're all the same hi-hat noise pitch.
1:22.046 - Changed. Recheck 1:22.046-1:22.736.
1:55.150 - Understandable. How about I nerf only this hand into a jump? Recheck this.
2:23.253 - Like this? Recheck here
2:25.667 - Transition now acceptable? Recheck 2:28.770-2:29.115
4:36.349 - The white note here is for the quiet drum roll in the background. If it's too distracting, then I'll change it back to normal color.
A new chart file was uploaded with the following changes:
----------
Note Count changed: 3003 => 3001
AVG NPS changed: 10.3946 => 10.38768
Hand Bias changed: -51 => -53
Posted at 7:13pm on December 21st, 2022
All good on my end! Good job.
Posted at 7:27am on December 23rd, 2022
The changes are sufficient enough and it's looking better now.
For 4:36 it's not that distracting, it just leaves a bit of a question but it's not that big of a deal.
Setting this to Accepted.