[7/10] Fixes Required

Permission: good
Metadata: good
Offset: good

- 1.554, 4.554(etc.): This note is very quiet, I would omit it.
- 2.116, 5.116(etc.): Same here.
- 2.303(etc.): These jacks are very spicy and the pitch is not repeating.
- 9.991, 10.179, 10.366: I understand why the other notes are jumps here, but these three should probably be singles.
- 11.679, 12.054: I would make these jumps, they're way less intense than the 4th notes.
- 12.616, 13.366(etc.)(kicks): Same here, these are way less intense than 12.991(etc.)(snares).
- 23.491: These probably shouldn't be 3-note jacks and I think hands are a bit much.
- 49.741 - 76.741: I don't really understand the jump usage here. If the jumps are going to the melody you have a bunch of missing jumps, if the jumps are going to the percussion you have a bunch of missing jumps. If the jumps are a convergence of the two you still have missing jumps.

This chart needs a lot of work in my opinion, nearly all the notes containing (etc.) indicate a structural problem with the chart.

This probably isn't a <70, the jacks at 160 bpm especially towards the end become very hard to hit, even for me as a mid/high D5 player.
This is a very cool song and I think the intensity of the song is represented pretty well in your chart, but the chart has a questionable difficulty curve and some of the jumps/hands are a bit iffy as well.
I think there's a very cool beginner/intermediate level chart hidden in there, but as it stands I feel it's a bit messy. I'll give it an FR so you can apply fixes.

Follow-up on fixes required here. It's been a little over a month since notes. We give all files at most a month in-batch so that authors may read and apply notes from judges to their files. If there's no fixes submitted soon, the file may be rejected.