A c i - L (Mipha) [7.0/10]
> Permission check good.
> Sync looks good (No changes necessary).
> No issues found within simfile properties.
> No issues found within submission folder contents.

-Don’t find anything inherently wrong in the intro here, but I do feel like it’s gonna be played/treated as-if it was from 2012 (meaning, it’s a bit dated in expected patterning).

-[01:00.541 & 01:00.726] Supposed to be 16th jumps rather than the jump on the 4th here as per structure (See: 00:54.615 and 00:48.689).

-I feel like a lot of this chart has its focus specifically on PR, rather than a good PR-to-pattern balance, since there are a couple of sections that suffer because bursts/transitions are expected to play the same, but do not. Couple examples being [01:00.819 vs. 00:48.967], where in this situation the same sort of transitional 24ths are being used and the song expecting similar outcomes but being portrayed here exceptionally different. (One takes advantage of a minitrill in the middle of it, the other one utilizing rolls w/ a right-hand bias.) [01:13.967 vs. 01:15.448 vs. 01:16.930 vs. 01:19.893] is another example, where you have the same pattern musically being used but every iteration of this plays differently.

-If the above note wasn’t direct enough, this comes across as a particularly sloppy yet safe jumpstream. I could see this going in as-is, but I would feel much more comfortable if there was some double-checking happening here since there are many ways to improve this.

[7/10] Changes Recommended.

Permission: good
Metadata: good
Offset: good

PR isn't strictly followed in this ARP section, which is fine, but I feel you should be consistent in how you approach the pitch. (If a sound is repeating like at 4.986 it should probably be on the same column)
Also, when I say a note should be on [insert column] I mean that relative to the notes before/after it, if you end up changing the notes around it this should obviously change with them.

- 3.227 - 3.597: The change in pitch isn't on the 16ths here, it's on the 4ths and 8ths.
- 4.986: This should be on [1] (same pitch).
- 9.615: Should be on [2] (same pitch). (9.801 is lower pitch)
- 12.578: Should probably be on a different column since it's noticeably different in pitch relative to 12.301.
- 15.356: Should be on [3] instead of [4].
- 16.930: This jump has a different pitch.
- 18.690: This 16th has a different pitch.
- 19.338: This 8th jump should form an anchor with 19.523 and 19.703.
- 21.282: This should be on [2].
- 24.338: Should be a different jump.
- 42.023: Should be on [4].
- 44.986: Should be on [4].
- 46.467: Should be on [3].
- 47.671: Part of this jump should be on [3].
- 50.078: Kinda wish you'd put the jump emphasis on this sound here. I feel that's the most natural way to change this section of the chart in accordance to what the music is doing.
- 96.375: This should be 24ths.
- 108.597: Bit subjective, but I feel this is significant enough to include.
- 111.745: Should be on a different column than 111.375.
- 114.708: Different column than 114.338. (You can do this by changing the jumptrill).
- 144.338: Probably shouldn't be a hand, there's no kick on this one.

PR isn't a dealbreaker for me in this file, it's pretty easy to follow what you're doing, but PR should be patterned consistently. If a sound is repeating 3 times it doesn't make sense to have a 2 or 4-note anchor. And that's probably my biggest issue with the file. The jumpstream is fine albeit a bit trill-y.
I feel the file is acceptable, but I urge you to make some changes to the way you anchor stuff. especially in the non-JS parts of the chart. Also misrhythms like 96.375 probably need fixing.

- I can see how you changed 3.227 - 3.597, but I think it would work better with the 16ths at 3.319, 3.504 and 3.690 being on [4], they are all the same pitch and that way the pattern of the 4ths and 8ths is more clear.

- 8.967, 9.245, 9.430 and 9.615 are all the same pitch.
- 18.690: In this situation I would probably put this 16th on [3] and the following jump on [24] so it's congruent with 18.504 -> 18.597.
- 19.338: I noted that this should form a 3-note anchor, but it should probably be seperated from the other 4th/8th notes so it's not a 5-note anchor.

- 50.078: I can see how it would be too heavy with the kicks + 8ths being jumps, but maybe you could make the 4ths singles? Whatever you like best though, it was merely a suggestion, either way is fine with me.

I would probably just use the name the artist used for this song. I know Willrock for example used both Willrock07 and Willrock on certain songs, but I would just PM goldstinger about it.

>On a side note, should I change the artist to yoshikawa45, since we already have G e n g a o z o on FFR already?

Use whatever alias they released the song under. It will link back to the same page on the wiki to credit the same author, but split/show aliases used on their wiki page.

I'm going to push this since a fix/comment hasn't been posted in a while, despite no finalization, but appears that a fair amount of work has been done to it under the 'Change Recommended' flag.