Stargazer (6.0/10)

Permission - good
Metadata - good

***Offset is wrong and should be set to 0.119, all timestamps will be according to this offset.

2.878 I understand the triplet pattern, but the PR on both the 16th's and the 8th notes is constantly descending. Instead of this triplet pattern something like this would be more accurate:
https://imgur.com/a/EXRXXMm

-5.637 PR on these 4th jumps feels a bit off, 7.016 is lower pitched than 5.637, but this doesn't reflect in your patterning. This + the note at 2.878 make it so the music doesn't feel represented well in this section.
-9.430 is higher pitched than 8.395.
-11.858: It's not entirely clear to me what this white note is representing here.
-15.981: Missing jump
-22.892: See 11.858
-24.947: This is way more intense than the 16th that follows, I would like to see this intensity represented better, especially since the 2 jumps are on the same column

***Beat changes at 30.464 and needs to be at 30.449 all timestamps will follow this. (bpm stays the same)

**35.277: Don't think I entirely agree with these claps being layered in as hands. You have way less room for PR this way and it feels kinda arbitrary

-35.449: The bass has a higher pitch here than at 35.966 I think putting the jump all the way to the left is kinda unnecessary, you can make it a [23] and it would still leave room for PR on 35.966. Which brings me to my next point

*35.966: I think this being a quad is just blatant overlayering. If you turn the claps into jumps and these crashes into 3-note hands, you have way more room for PR and I think with a melodious song like this PR is very important.
-37.690: While technically not entirely wrong I would highly prefer to see this jump moved to [13] for PR, this [12] suggests some kind of repetition which isn't there. You also have no room for PR at 38.035 because of the hands. I just don't think it represents the music well. There is no repetition here.
-46.311: This being a quad and the next 4th being a quad is again a product of the overlayering, you have no room to differentiate the two sounds even though they're pretty different.
-48.035: Here you start layering in the melody as jumps, which is fine. But it becomes really convoluted when everything is stepped as jumps. When I played through it I wasn't entirely sure what the jumps were representing any more. On top of PR already being questionable the note placement feels a bit random at times.
-49.414: This [14] is higher in pitch than 48.035 yet it's the same jump. In a slow song like this I would like to see PR followed better. -49.070 is also higher pitched so PR again isn't represented very well throughout this section.
-51.311: missing jump to the melody

Also notes like 57.863 and 58.035 suggest some kind of repetition, you do this alot where the jump and the 2 notes of the hand are on the same column when that's not really what the music does. It would be more accurate to have the hand at 58.035 be a [134]

*65.277: This jack seems odd, all the jacks from 61.828 to 64.587 seem to follow the melody somewhat, but at 65.277 there is no melody yet the structure stays the same.
-66.311: Here you start layering the kicks with the melody as hands, which is good honestly, but it's not very consistent because if I would follow your layering consistently melody + clap would be a quad.
-80.104: Here you just follow the melody as singles, but you are no longer layering the pads in as jumps anymore. PR is better here tho.

***80.794: Beat shifts again and should be moved to 80.811, all future timestamps will follow this

***98.741: Happens again and should be moved to 98.724

this point onward the layering seems arbitrarily dense, I like the idea of having more chord-jack oriented charts in FFR, but this song just doesn't really warrant such patterning imo.

More important notes are indicated with *'s

Final thoughts: I think alot of the 'faults' with this file are conscious choices with a goal to make a chordjack file. I can see why PR isn't always followed and it's mainly to do with the layering choices you made. I would like to see a more toned down version of this file, because I think the song is really cool. However, as is I cannot accept this simply because the file isn't synced properly and there are so many layering inconsistencies and PR issues.