Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 - Page 124

who_cares973 · 01-11-2012, 12:10 AM

halfway done judging

Choofers · 01-11-2012, 01:15 AM

tell me what to fix on my half !!

**Ziergdsx18** · 01-11-2012, 01:18 AM

**iironiic** · 01-11-2012, 01:32 AM

Done judging lmfao. I'll look over my notes before sending it

**bmah** · 01-11-2012, 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iironiic

Done judging lmfao. I'll look over my notes before sending it

Are you serious...

if so, props to your dedication

**YoshL** · 01-11-2012, 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmah

Are you serious...

if so, props to your dedication

yup he finished.

one line reviewsftw

**iironiic** · 01-11-2012, 01:55 AM

Yeah I decided not to be in depth this time because I realize that half of the time, I don't even know what I'm talking about xD

But I still accounted for everything (at least that's what I think).

**jimerax** · 01-11-2012, 02:08 AM

Yeah if you (submitters) want wo submit more files, not forcing notes to judges (only ratings, or just really short comments) is one strong idea.

I think this is fine if they take a lot of time for judges.

**ninjaKIWI** · 01-11-2012, 10:45 AM

I really enjoy longer notes, as it does really help in fixing up my files, but if the judges don't want to provide super extensive feedback then that's their decision I think.

**i love you** · 01-11-2012, 01:41 PM

As a ex judge, what I did was that I would play the file first. If the file was fun and replayable, I would put [+.] (or 6/10) automatically. After that, I go to the editor and kinda scroll through it making sure it does not have any missing/misplaced notes. If the file is free or semi-free of errors then that person gets a [+] (7/10-10/10 will vary based on small mistakes, fun factor, and uniqueness of the file). If the file had some noticeable errors then it will remain a [+.] (6/10)

Also, I usually note somewhere in my notes mentioning that people should PM me if they wanted a longer in-depth review. Usually what happens is that if their file passed judgment, they do not bother to fix the mistakes given to them before it goes public which is another issue with this judging system. It is only when their file does not pass judgment that they would PM the judges because of dissatisfaction with the grades given to them.

PS: If people were smart enough, they would talk/PM some of the judges during the submission period and have them review your file ahead of time so you will have time to fix some of the errors given before submitting it to the batch. Doing this will GREATLY increase your chance of your file getting accepted. (*hint hint*)

(:

**iironiic** · 01-11-2012, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninjaKIWI

I really enjoy longer notes, as it does really help in fixing up my files, but if the judges don't want to provide super extensive feedback then that's their decision I think.

I would provide longer notes but I don't think that's necessary if the stepartist can contact with any of the judges to go through the file together. In fact, I encourage stepartists to do this more since you will learn a lot that way.

**Elite Ninja** · 01-11-2012, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iironiic

I would provide longer notes but I don't think that's necessary if the stepartist can contact with any of the judges to go through the file together. In fact, I encourage stepartists to do this more since you will learn a lot that way.

This is very true since I have done this hehe. Helps out a lot and you learn from it.

**ninjaKIWI** · 01-13-2012, 11:09 AM

So long as none of my files get lower than [+?] I'm happy :')

Anaru · 01-13-2012, 11:11 AM

Damn you kiwi. I saw a BRAND NEW POST by you in the queue/batch discussion thread.

.. No update.

DASHED HOPES.

Choofers · 01-13-2012, 11:26 AM

new post

**Elite Ninja** · 01-13-2012, 12:01 PM

HYPE!..... False hope.

**ninjaKIWI** · 01-13-2012, 12:22 PM

I'm ruining everyones day.

**VisD** · 01-14-2012, 04:44 AM

excited bike

takumi000 · 01-14-2012, 08:00 AM

No Update, dammit

**kjwkjw** · 01-14-2012, 10:02 AM

Almost halfway done judging.

Think I'm done for tonight, though.

01-11-2012, 12:10 AM	#2461
who_cares973 FFR Player Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: :U Age: 35 Posts: 15,407	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) halfway done judging __________________

01-11-2012, 01:15 AM	#2462
Choofers FFR Player Join Date: Dec 2008 Age: 33 Posts: 6,205	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) tell me what to fix on my half !! __________________

01-11-2012, 01:18 AM	#2463
Ziergdsx18 ℜ1 ステップチャート著者 Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Key West, FL Age: 34 Posts: 2,800	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) __________________ \| irc.rizon.net \| #touhouradio - Come listen! \|

01-11-2012, 01:32 AM	#2464
iironiic D6 FFR Legacy Player Join Date: Jan 2009 Age: 32 Posts: 4,342	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) Done judging lmfao. I'll look over my notes before sending it

01-11-2012, 01:55 AM	#2467
iironiic D6 FFR Legacy Player Join Date: Jan 2009 Age: 32 Posts: 4,342	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) Yeah I decided not to be in depth this time because I realize that half of the time, I don't even know what I'm talking about xD But I still accounted for everything (at least that's what I think).

01-11-2012, 02:08 AM	#2468
jimerax ★_★★^★★ Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Tokyo Posts: 8,185	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) Yeah if you (submitters) want wo submit more files, not forcing notes to judges (only ratings, or just really short comments) is one strong idea. I think this is fine if they take a lot of time for judges.

01-11-2012, 10:45 AM	#2469
ninjaKIWI plain old ugly ass dumbas Join Date: Aug 2006 Age: 31 Posts: 3,303	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) I really enjoy longer notes, as it does really help in fixing up my files, but if the judges don't want to provide super extensive feedback then that's their decision I think.

01-11-2012, 01:41 PM	#2470
i love you Live a wonderful life~ Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 7,313	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) As a ex judge, what I did was that I would play the file first. If the file was fun and replayable, I would put [+.] (or 6/10) automatically. After that, I go to the editor and kinda scroll through it making sure it does not have any missing/misplaced notes. If the file is free or semi-free of errors then that person gets a [+] (7/10-10/10 will vary based on small mistakes, fun factor, and uniqueness of the file). If the file had some noticeable errors then it will remain a [+.] (6/10) Also, I usually note somewhere in my notes mentioning that people should PM me if they wanted a longer in-depth review. Usually what happens is that if their file passed judgment, they do not bother to fix the mistakes given to them before it goes public which is another issue with this judging system. It is only when their file does not pass judgment that they would PM the judges because of dissatisfaction with the grades given to them. PS: If people were smart enough, they would talk/PM some of the judges during the submission period and have them review your file ahead of time so you will have time to fix some of the errors given before submitting it to the batch. Doing this will GREATLY increase your chance of your file getting accepted. (hint hint) (: __________________ =============================== The idea that RDCP 3 may come out in the future is a fun thought to have~ ===============================

01-13-2012, 11:09 AM	#2473
ninjaKIWI plain old ugly ass dumbas Join Date: Aug 2006 Age: 31 Posts: 3,303	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) So long as none of my files get lower than [+?] I'm happy :')

01-13-2012, 11:11 AM	#2474
Anaru Banned Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Berkeley, California Posts: 1,530	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) Damn you kiwi. I saw a BRAND NEW POST by you in the queue/batch discussion thread. .. No update. DASHED HOPES.

01-13-2012, 11:26 AM	#2475
Choofers FFR Player Join Date: Dec 2008 Age: 33 Posts: 6,205	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) new post __________________

01-13-2012, 12:01 PM	#2476
Elite Ninja Kawaii Desu Difficulty Consulting Cat Join Date: Mar 2007 Age: 30 Posts: 4,811	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) HYPE!..... False hope. __________________

01-13-2012, 12:22 PM	#2477
ninjaKIWI plain old ugly ass dumbas Join Date: Aug 2006 Age: 31 Posts: 3,303	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) I'm ruining everyones day.

01-14-2012, 04:44 AM	#2478
VisD FFR Simfile Author Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,195	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) excited bike

01-14-2012, 08:00 AM	#2479
takumi000 FFR Player Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Aichi, Japan Age: 27 Posts: 51	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) No Update, dammit __________________ 6th FFR Official Tournament: 1st Place in D1 ScarletSky's Amateur Tournament: 4th Place in D4 7th FFR Official Tournament: Eliminated at Round 5 in D2

01-14-2012, 10:02 AM	#2480
kjwkjw >w< Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Location, Location Age: 30 Posts: 2,584	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 (Submission Closed) Almost halfway done judging. Think I'm done for tonight, though. __________________ Goodbye and good riddance, military service (February 23, 2015 ~ February 22, 2017) Project Sekai 437 / Princess Connect! ReDive 265

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)