Suspicious Scores thread (Formerly Hacked Scores)

[One Winged Angel]

Legitimate discussion without flaming and trolling has actually happened before in this thread. It's when randoms with one sentence posts feel the need to offer their (quite often uneducated) opinion on the issue with a little poke at someone that shit starts to hit the fan.

Also god damn lmao krunky's post at noon is fucking hilarious lmfaoooo

[bmah]

krunky, your posts aren't helping in the "rational, civil discussion" that qqrwef -just- mentioned prior to your comments. I get your point and I'm not trying to defend RuGuru or anything, but your posts have so many damn asterisks...it's almost like you're negating qq's words.

[krunkykai22]

That's why my nickname is the asterisk poster Bmah.

And thanks OWA lulz :P


EDIT: And my post didn't contain that many asterisk's bmah lol what 3 words?

[CammyGoesRawr]

So, how about getting this thread back on topic?

[ichliebekase]

Originally Posted by bmah

but your posts have so many damn asterisks...it's almost like you're negating qq's words.

3 words got changed to asterisks and you're saying it's hard to understand? @_@

[bmah]

No.

Originally Posted by qqwref

It is completely possible to have a civil, rational discussion in this thread, and it's been done before.

Now compare to krunky's posts. It's completely ironic. Just playing the devil's advocate. Want a civil discussion? Don't post like a mad dog.

[rushyrulz]

The train is wobbling on its tracks and we're heading for a full derailment.

[psychoangel691]

K well if someone has a suspicious score/person for me to add send me a PM. I'm tired of digging through all this junk and it seems that it's impossible to keep this on track.

[justin_ator]

-shrugs shoulders- I suggested a BS Calls thread, but was told by two people it wasn't a good idea / wasn't worth it. oh well.
would have kept this thread cleaned up and whatnot

[krunkykai22]

I kind of agree with Justin. A bs thread would be perfect, along with a "Why so serious" thread for those who keep asking why people take this site so seriously. Hey, would keep people outta here at least.

[bmah]

Justin asked my opinion on a separate thread, and I wasn't sure how effective it would be to redirect traffic and arguments. But if you want, you can certainly make one yourself and hope that people will post in the respective threads.

[krunkykai22]

As long as people explain where to have these arguments I don't see the issue. If someone is calling BS, <insert link to justin's bs thread here> go there and argue.

Maybe even have a list on the OP as to who is calling who bs and what is confirmed and what isn't. Simple really.

[justin_ator]

I'll make it then, and we'll see how it goes.

[One Winged Angel]

Aren't suspicious scores just scores that could potentially be bs?

Unless you intend to create a thread where people don't sugar coat anything and just straight up call bullshit on players. But without any hard evidence, it's still just a suspicion. The thread would ultimately serve the same purpose as this one.

[krunkykai22]

Thanks OWA. You killed it.

[psychoangel691]

Okay well when scores don't get taken care of because they're not going where they belong I don't want to hear all the complaining. With two threads it's just going to be more confusing.

[krunkykai22]

Okay, I got it. Everyone is BS unless your Rubix. Okay, wipe everyone's scores.

[justin_ator]

Typed up a nice OP, came back and read this, guess we'll just continue the bs calls in here. Proceed as you were, citizens.


EDIT:

Originally Posted by One Winged Angel

Aren't suspicious scores just scores that could potentially be bs?

Unless you intend to create a thread where people don't sugar coat anything and just straight up call bullshit on players. But without any hard evidence, it's still just a suspicion. The thread would ultimately serve the same purpose as this one.

I see your point, but at the same time Kayla talks about it like she doesn't want any discussion on the topic in here. The thread I would be making would be solely for discussing legitimacy of players who have been on the site long enough to not just be random botting faces, people who have a plethora of legitimate scores but maybe a bs score on one or two songs (such as Mina's RATO or ssbmchamp's Eclipse (Solar) scores). A RATO AAA on an account a week old is something you would report in this thread, an account that looks like an alt AAA'ing a bunch of 12s is something you would report in this thread. The new one, like I said, would be for valid bs calls on legitimate players.

[psychoangel691]

Originally Posted by justin_ator

I see your point, but at the same time Kayla talks about it like she doesn't want any discussion on the topic in here. The thread I would be making would be solely for discussing legitimacy of players who have been on the site long enough to not just be random botting faces, people who have a plethora of legitimate scores but maybe a bs score on one or two songs (such as Mina's RATO or ssbmchamp's Eclipse (Solar) scores). A RATO AAA on an account a week old is something you would report in this thread, an account that looks like an alt AAA'ing a bunch of 12s is something you would report in this thread. The new one, like I said, would be for valid bs calls on legitimate players.

When did I ever say I didn't want ANY discussion on the topic. I don't want the flaming/arguing that goes on which in turn brings in people posting things completely irrelevant (popcorn gif, etc) I want people to bring other evidence for or against the call, as long as it actually supports it one way or another and isn't just "oh you're dumb or you're dossar" Don't put words in my mouth.

On another note this should be up to date now (I hope I didn't miss anything) I have the ones that you guys were suspicious of because of the large amount of gameplays/grandtotal up under accounts to look into because I'm not too sure what to think of those.

[Oni-Paranoia]

Originally Posted by justin_ator

The new one, like I said, would be for valid bs calls on legitimate players.

And here we have this thread to discuss someones legitimacy over what scores are "suspicious."

I don't think you can make another thread and expect it to run any smoother (or rougher) than this one.