Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 - Page 392

**DossarLX ODI** · 12-12-2013, 06:33 PM

Finished judging.

1/10: 0
2/10: 3
3/10: 10
4/10: 4
5/10: 6
6/10: 12
7/10: 12
8/10: 10
9/10: 1
[PASS]: 2

327/58 = 5.64

**YoshL** · 12-12-2013, 06:44 PM

shit this is a thing

**Charu** · 12-12-2013, 06:57 PM

10 3/10's? Phew, that's a lot.

Wayward Vagabond · 12-12-2013, 07:25 PM

Typical

**rCaliberGX** · 12-12-2013, 07:29 PM

dossareviews

southern cross prolly got 3/10 lol

**bmah** · 12-12-2013, 07:30 PM

Sometimes I wonder if judges are just psyching themselves into believing they're not being harsh enough, as opposed to a greater number of files being worse. So far, a good majority of the files I've looked through already have been really cool, and I'm not afraid to say it. There's nothing wrong with "appearing lenient" - it's all about being honest with the scores.

Then again, the low scores might be an effect of one being jaded by seeing so many similar files. As people do new things, it's harder to find more originality.

**bmah** · 12-12-2013, 08:16 PM

Bump again as a reminder to check that you're submitting files correctly. Someone has just submitted a file that includes nothing but a .dwi file. Not even a folder.

choof · 12-13-2013, 05:28 PM

The section I'm judging has some really good song choice, I'm actually looking forward to playing the majority of the files.

Except renard. Fuck him.

**XelNya** · 12-13-2013, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmah

Sometimes I wonder if judges are just psyching themselves into believing they're not being harsh enough, as opposed to a greater number of files being worse. So far, a good majority of the files I've looked through already have been really cool, and I'm not afraid to say it. There's nothing wrong with "appearing lenient" - it's all about being honest with the scores.

Then again, the low scores might be an effect of one being jaded by seeing so many similar files. As people do new things, it's harder to find more originality.

Not sure how relevant this is to most of you, but when judging on TS I always thought I was being too mean point wise. Most charts I thought where acceptable got like 6.7 averages (due to the way TS judging worked due to averaging three things together) (This also means they just barely got accepted from me that is) and that was hard to do, because in my head it's like "this file is acceptable, but I don't feel anything about it is that great or memorable so it's just average" but then I'd see other judges give it like a 7 - 9 or something. Always felt weird to me. Then the one time I actually handed out an amazing score it got downed a bit by the others. lol

**Fission** · 12-13-2013, 05:56 PM

**Razor** · 12-13-2013, 05:59 PM

number of buttholes reamed in that .txt file: 60

ilikexd · 12-13-2013, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fission

wow! Date Created Today, December 13 You just Fast

**PrawnSkunk** · 12-13-2013, 06:04 PM

way past cool!

choof · 12-13-2013, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XelNya

Not sure how relevant this is to most of you, but when judging on TS I always thought I was being too mean point wise. Most charts I thought where acceptable got like 6.7 averages (due to the way TS judging worked due to averaging three things together) (This also means they just barely got accepted from me that is) and that was hard to do, because in my head it's like "this file is acceptable, but I don't feel anything about it is that great or memorable so it's just average" but then I'd see other judges give it like a 7 - 9 or something. Always felt weird to me. Then the one time I actually handed out an amazing score it got downed a bit by the others. lol

I don't think you're really one to talk about judging files.

**XelNya** · 12-14-2013, 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by choof

I don't think you're really one to talk about judging files.

I don't think you actually know anything about me actually judging versus that colorful commentary I am known for. Even then I think you're missing the point.

Point being I was pretty psyched into being not lenient enough due to my own views of stepfiles.

But I would say it might be a bad comparison to be honest, the amount of time spent is not comparable.

choof · 12-14-2013, 01:12 AM

yeah I don't know much about you judging, considering I only have one file in TS and that was judged relatively early in the site's life

my point was that not many people truly respect your views on judging simfiles, point blank

**XelNya** · 12-14-2013, 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by choof

yeah I don't know much about you judging...

my point was that not many people truly respect your views on judging simfiles, point blank

It's not really relevant if you respect my abilities or not. I was just saying that as someone who has judged files before my mindset was backwards from what Bmah was thinking about. I felt I was more lenient than I should have been. Just an outside view is all.

choof · 12-14-2013, 02:23 AM

lol how cute

**XelNya** · 12-14-2013, 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by choof

lol how cute

Yes my Avi is. It's also quite creepy.

ilikexd · 12-14-2013, 02:44 AM

ur ava sucks

12-12-2013, 07:25 PM	#7824
Wayward Vagabond Confirmed Heartbreaker Join Date: Jul 2012 Age: 35 Posts: 5,859	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 Typical __________________

12-12-2013, 07:30 PM	#7826
bmah shots FIRED Global Moderator, User Support, Judge Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Edmonton, AB Age: 36 Posts: 8,448	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 Sometimes I wonder if judges are just psyching themselves into believing they're not being harsh enough, as opposed to a greater number of files being worse. So far, a good majority of the files I've looked through already have been really cool, and I'm not afraid to say it. There's nothing wrong with "appearing lenient" - it's all about being honest with the scores. Then again, the low scores might be an effect of one being jaded by seeing so many similar files. As people do new things, it's harder to find more originality.

12-12-2013, 08:16 PM	#7827
bmah shots FIRED Global Moderator, User Support, Judge Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Edmonton, AB Age: 36 Posts: 8,448	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 Bump again as a reminder to check that you're submitting files correctly. Someone has just submitted a file that includes nothing but a .dwi file. Not even a folder.

12-13-2013, 05:28 PM	#7828
choof Banned Join Date: Nov 2013 Posts: 8,563	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 The section I'm judging has some really good song choice, I'm actually looking forward to playing the majority of the files. Except renard. Fuck him.

12-13-2013, 05:56 PM	#7830
Fission no Join Date: Jan 2004 Age: 33 Posts: 1,850	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2

12-13-2013, 06:04 PM	#7833
PrawnSkunk Administrator User Administrator Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Vancouver, BC Age: 29 Posts: 3,902	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 way past cool!

12-14-2013, 01:12 AM	#7836
choof Banned Join Date: Nov 2013 Posts: 8,563	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 yeah I don't know much about you judging, considering I only have one file in TS and that was judged relatively early in the site's life my point was that not many people truly respect your views on judging simfiles, point blank

12-14-2013, 02:23 AM	#7838
choof Banned Join Date: Nov 2013 Posts: 8,563	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 lol how cute

12-14-2013, 02:44 AM	#7840
ilikexd Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 3,205	Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread v2 ur ava sucks

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)