TWG CLVI: The Grand TWGabout - GAME THREAD

[Gradiant]

then again, you are arrogant as fuck. I shouldn't expect anything different from you. I still like my vote where it is though

[AragakiAyase]

Originally Posted by AragakiAyase

cool

good thing it's a 72 hour day

Originally Posted by AragakiAyase

read my posts

Originally Posted by AragakiAyase

I voted you off one post

I ignored all the memes

Originally Posted by AragakiAyase

and it's very easy to say your posts were all bs after the fact as a cover up, but I believe the post I voted you for was not bs and was what I said it was

requoting

Originally Posted by AragakiAyase

ok, why does it seem fake? A bunch of people were throwing around votes, it's pretty easy to join in and throw a vote on someone that can easily turn into a parked vote. Then someone (yoshl) points the spotlight on you (indheart) and he backs off, then tries to change the topic suddenly.



I did, but the fact is you left your read out in one post "to humor me"? if that's true then lol, seems very unusual of you to actually humor me in a game when your interactions with me are more like they are right now

Originally Posted by AragakiAyase

yep I understand

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

but I'll have myself off the table before these 72 hours are up so it doesn't really matter

I also wouldn't put indheart in there, it just seems like he's "wagoning" along with that reasoning. When he says I've been weird with "oddly serious wagoning", I actually placed a vote based on something that I thought was wolfy. But I'm not the only one to have done that so it seems odd why he's treating that differently from the other instances that it's happened.

..

[reuben_tate]

Originally Posted by Gradiant

nice hard concrete evidence

Sorry, I couldn't help but get a good laugh from this. I feel like "hard concrete evidence" and "day 0" don't mix well.

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar

I wonder if we're in another game where one of the reds are being really active and one of them is being really inactive. Like that's a little bit of a theme that I feel like has been going on these games


I don't know how valid this train of thought is but imma freestyle this for a minute




So looking at this, there are a number of us who are pretty active in the thread and alot of those who have posted very little. What are the chances that, if I divided this into 2 or three categories, that we would find our wolves within the same ones?

Clearly this doesn't point to the wolves, but I'll be very surprised if, say both AA and Xel where partners, or Charu and Gradiant.

That's an interesting thing to point out; I think a lot of us have noticed that theme as well. However, even if that theory holds up, it's not much use to us during d0 since it's a bit too early to be trying to be guessing possible wolf partners due to the amount of combinations and the information doesn't allow for us to single any one possible wolf out either.

Originally Posted by Charu

I agree

Source: Me

v

Originally Posted by Gradiant

nice hard concrete evidence

[AragakiAyase]

Originally Posted by Gradiant

then again, you are arrogant as fuck. I shouldn't expect anything different from you. I still like my vote where it is though

bringing in the insults now but then again, I shouldn't expect anything different from you

[AragakiAyase]

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar

I wonder if we're in another game where one of the reds are being really active and one of them is being really inactive. Like that's a little bit of a theme that I feel like has been going on these games


I don't know how valid this train of thought is but imma freestyle this for a minute




So looking at this, there are a number of us who are pretty active in the thread and alot of those who have posted very little. What are the chances that, if I divided this into 2 or three categories, that we would find our wolves within the same ones?

Clearly this doesn't point to the wolves, but I'll be very surprised if, say both AA and Xel where partners, or Charu and Gradiant.

missed this until ben quoted it but whey are you pairing me/xel and charu/gradiant? afaik xel has barely posted anything while I've posted a lot more

[AragakiAyase]

oh actually xel did post a lot

but I don't remember most of them

[Red Blaster]

Originally Posted by AragakiAyase

missed this until ben quoted it but whey are you pairing me/xel and charu/gradiant? afaik xel has barely posted anything while I've posted a lot more

It lines up with his one scum posting more, one scum afk'ing

[AragakiAyase]

dabackpack are you really here

[Charu]

Originally Posted by AragakiAyase

bringing in the insults now but then again, I shouldn't expect anything different from you

[MixMasterLar]

Originally Posted by AragakiAyase

missed this until ben quoted it but whey are you pairing me/xel and charu/gradiant? afaik xel has barely posted anything while I've posted a lot more

To be clear I am not pairing nobody. I am saying that I feel there is a chance one scum is posting alot and one isn't, so if that holds true some pairings wouldn't be possible.

To that extent, I gave two examples pulled fresh from me bumm hole. Even in the context of the example, I am not saying you and Xel are partners.

Originally Posted by Red Blaster

It lines up with his one scum posting more, one scum afk'ing

If Xel was low in post count, it would...but he is not. It's all good since I was using it as an example of an unlikely pairing within the theory .

[Red Blaster]

Originally Posted by Wineandbread

Upon reading the thread I have no particularly strong feelings for anyone

I do agree that AA saying "i'll have myself off the table in 72 hrs" is a bit goofy, but not uhh

what's the term

alignment indicative

I like this post.

[MixMasterLar]

Originally Posted by reuben_tate

That's an interesting thing to point out; I think a lot of us have noticed that theme as well. However, even if that theory holds up, it's not much use to us during d0 since it's a bit too early to be trying to be guessing possible wolf partners due to the amount of combinations and the information doesn't allow for us to single any one possible wolf out either.

Yeah, it is pretty early to point it out, but I figured why not *shrugs*

If anything it will be nice to compare the postcounts quoted to later days.

[MixMasterLar]

Originally Posted by Red Blaster

I like this post.

Do you just agree with it, or is it a combination of what it said+who said it?

[reuben_tate]

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar

Yeah, it is pretty early to point it out, but I figured why not *shrugs*

If anything it will be nice to compare the postcounts quoted to later days.

Only thing I'm worried about is now that you've made that post and pointed that out, it might encourage the wolves to change their behavior to counter that theory.

[DaBackpack]

Originally Posted by AragakiAyase

dabackpack are you really here

I haven't caught up yet but sorta

[Charu]

Originally Posted by reuben_tate

Only thing I'm worried about is now that you've made that post and pointed that out, it might encourage the wolves to change their behavior to counter that theory.

Have you, in some way, shape, or form had to represent the prosecution?

[reuben_tate]

Originally Posted by Charu

Have you, in some way, shape, or form had to represent the prosecution?

[YoshL]

charu looks really good right now fmpov, ethan still looks shit

then again i've skimmed the past 2 pages

ok

[Red Blaster]

Originally Posted by MixMasterLar

Do you just agree with it, or is it a combination of what it said+who said it?

I can't particularly say it had anything to do with who said it. I don't think I've played a game with Wabby yet so idk.

It was more that he addressed the AA issue for what it was: an odd post, but nothing worth overly reading into at this point.

[MixMasterLar]

Originally Posted by reuben_tate

Only thing I'm worried about is now that you've made that post and pointed that out, it might encourage the wolves to change their behavior to counter that theory.

We've had enough time for everyone to post, so I believe that if that's what is going on then that is already reflected in the count. Besides, at this point, I would love to see someone with, say 8 post try to ramp it up to counter this, or someone who's been really super active kind of fall off the radar. Be really interesting to see which ones do or do appear to post differently.

Unless you mean a meta shift in future games, in which case we'll get to those when we get to those.

Originally Posted by Red Blaster

I can't particularly say it had anything to do with who said it. I don't think I've played a game with Wabby yet so idk.

It was more that he addressed the AA issue for what it was: an odd post, but nothing worth overly reading into at this point.

Fair enough perspective. I think that he's being a bit more defensive/edgy then I've ever seen him be with that, but that's me.