07-5-2006, 11:28 AM | #81 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 270
|
Re: time travel
Quote:
Reach, I don't know, maybe the movie diverged from the book quite a bit, but I know the book certainly didn't have any of that. The reason I was talking about relativity was because that also meant that people didn't know anything about the whole speed of light barrier, time dilation, etc., and so hadn't actually needed to think much about time in terms of science except as a linear progression along which to measure data. As for there being nothing solid in this topic - the theory of general relativity was the first to propose time as a dimension on par with our three spatial dimensions, a proposition which is now pretty scientifically accepted. I think this is pretty important in any discussion of time travel, because it brings up somewhere to at least start looking at it and reasoning about it. -fs |
|
07-5-2006, 11:32 AM | #82 |
FFR Simfile Author
|
Re: time travel
I suppose we have that as a pretty solid fact. Good point.
But I mean like, aside from time dilation, there are really no facts to support anything other than well...time dilation itself. Which I hope is the only sort of 'time travel' that will ever be possible XD I brought up the time machine movie mostly because it uh, talks about the same stuff that has been mentioned on the last page or so here in a pretty good manner.
__________________
|
07-5-2006, 11:48 AM | #83 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 虹の中に
Age: 31
Posts: 537
|
Re: time travel
Time is also perceived differently. For example when doing something interesting, it tends to pass quickly but when doing something boring. It tends to last a lot longer. I hate that part about it. ;p
So time that we measure via clocks is not accurate at all. Some hours are like 3 hours, some like 20 mins. I am guessing your time is ever adjusting regardless off the surrounding durations(time). Some people live longer lives. Could it be because their time is different. I also know that genetics and for how long their cells possess ability to divide affect this, but isn't this also affected by duration?
__________________
Last edited by Suzuru; 07-5-2006 at 11:52 AM.. |
07-5-2006, 12:59 PM | #84 | |
FFR Player
|
Re: time travel
Quote:
__________________
|
|
07-5-2006, 02:28 PM | #85 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Louisiana
Age: 36
Posts: 329
|
Re: time travel
Suzura metioned after the first post as how the present cannot change, and the second post, I stated how it would change.
|
07-5-2006, 10:38 PM | #86 | |
FFR Player
|
Re: time travel
Quote:
If you spent an hour counting seconds, then it going to feel like a REALLY long hour because you were never occupied enough not to think about, and therefore register, how much time actually passed. It's not time dilation. Time isn't moving faster or slower around you. If you were to wear a watch and synched it with a clock and they were different after an hour (assuming nothing changed the clock and watch, duh), then time dilated somewhere along the line. No matter how occupied you are, time passes the same (assuming you aren't moving fast enough for real time dilation to happen).
__________________
|
|
07-5-2006, 11:22 PM | #87 |
You thought I was a GUY?!
|
Re: time travel
Everything it matter and energy... and that is affected over time. No matter what, you would never be able to affect that matter in a way where it actually UNDOES itself, without giving off or absorbing energy, and that would mean that everyone would be affected by a time travel, being that the time travel wouldn't alter you, but everything else... or if you were to alter a single thing in a closed environment, how could you make grown molecules work backwards? The change of energy would always be so great, that the sheer impossibility, and the utter destruction of something would happen, before the time travel process could have started.
(Or so I would think) |
07-5-2006, 11:39 PM | #88 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ****dog
Age: 35
Posts: 950
|
Re: time travel
gay
__________________
Last edited by Minion133; 10-10-2010 at 01:27 PM.. |
07-6-2006, 08:58 AM | #89 |
FFR Simfile Author
|
Re: time travel
With our current means of generating energy...of course.
Zero point energy predicts something like 10^53 joules of energy in every cubic meter XD Now if we could figure out how to use some of it. And it's not really like we know how much energy teleportation/any of this would take anyway.
__________________
Last edited by Reach; 07-6-2006 at 09:04 AM.. |
07-6-2006, 01:27 PM | #90 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 270
|
Re: time travel
Unlike in a tape recorder, though, events at one time influence events at another time instantly (i.e. because the tape itself IS time, there is no timeline along which to do anything to the tape).
|
07-15-2006, 10:42 PM | #91 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Stinking Cow
Posts: 325
|
Re: time travel
bull****
it doesnt exist you need to get a life and worry about global warming theshrimp |
07-15-2006, 10:52 PM | #92 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: awsome
Posts: 2,946
|
Re: time travel
Here's a better analogy:
Pretend the world is a two-dimensional circle. (I realize it's not, but for the sake of analogy and visualization.) You can visualize history as an infinite cylinder, with the third dimension being time. So at any point, you're at a circle on this cylinder, moving around in the world. You can trace something through time by tracing its movements upwards through the cylinder. But the most important part of this analogy is that the cylinder doesn't change. It's a cylinder, it's there, and that's all there is to it. Now, moving backwards through time would simply involve moving backwards through the cylinder. But this is an event that is already on the cylinder. So, either: 1) Time travel is impossible because it's not recorded anywhere on the cylinder, or 2) Time travel won't change anything. Because it already happened.
__________________
hehe |
07-16-2006, 12:53 AM | #93 |
FFR Player
|
Re: time travel
even so if you could go the speed of light and and we could use time dilation to our advantage we would have to be able to harness it. Noit only that but then there would have to be a pretdetermined future becuz how can you go into the future if it hasn't happened yet. If anything is evenly remotely "possible" it would be going back in time but even that can't be achieved.
|
07-16-2006, 01:17 AM | #94 | |
Private College
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lol badger
Posts: 536
|
Re: time travel
Quote:
|
|
07-16-2006, 03:17 AM | #95 |
Banned
|
Re: time travel
Has anyone read the Michael Crichton book, "Timeline"? I think that's a good way of defining time travel.
|
07-16-2006, 04:14 AM | #96 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 270
|
Re: time travel
Quote:
Also I like how people keep bumping this topic with posts that totally disregard everything that has been established over the last 96 posts >_> -fs |
|
07-16-2006, 09:15 AM | #97 | |||
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 虹の中に
Age: 31
Posts: 537
|
Re: time travel
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
07-16-2006, 11:13 AM | #98 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: awsome
Posts: 2,946
|
Re: time travel
Quote:
@others: Radians have no units, and why would you want to measure time travel?
__________________
hehe |
|
07-16-2006, 01:41 PM | #99 |
FFR Player
|
Re: time travel
it is possible to see past events and future events though. this would require going several times the speed of light though and you would not be in a different time era but you would be able to view something from long ago. If you where to leave earth right now and go several hundred light years away in one light year, you would see the earth from 99 light years ago. this is only becuz you have surpassed the distance that the light earth has reflected. So you would see earth at a different time. also you can do this by going to a distant star. from earth you are seeing the star from however long it took for that light to reach earth. if you could travel faster to that star than it took for the light to reach earth then you would then skip several stages of it's life.
|
07-16-2006, 08:14 PM | #100 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 270
|
Re: time travel
t0rajir0u, sure radians have units - they're a transformation between two distance domains.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|