Footmania

**aperson** · 03-15-2006, 12:21 AM

Given fame F and amount of gabber G as a function of time t
dF/dt is directly proportional to dG/dt.

however, the correlation between F and talent T is approximately zero and might even be negative.

This model is comletely accurate and accounts for the case where T = 0 and values of G and F are both very large, such as with DanTheMan.

Kil- · 03-15-2006, 12:22 AM

Gj this whole website is doomed.

xMordecaix · 03-15-2006, 12:24 AM

Lololooooooool

Kles · 03-15-2006, 12:25 AM

But what about when T is huge and G and F are zero?

**aperson** · 03-15-2006, 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kles

But what about when T is huge and G and F are zero?

Then you get me

Kles · 03-15-2006, 12:31 AM

makes sense thanks

flamingspinach · 03-15-2006, 12:37 AM

F isn't zero you hypocrite

**aperson** · 03-15-2006, 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flamingspinach

F isn't zero you hypocrite

Fine it approaches zero

asymptotefag

medik · 03-15-2006, 05:01 AM

And in such equations where G is actually positive and T is fairly large, is it possible to obtain a positive value for F?

Bursurk_Lurk · 03-15-2006, 06:50 AM

Thanks for the info

**Snapps** · 03-15-2006, 07:28 AM

I am enlightened

Foxboy9x · 03-15-2006, 08:31 AM

ok, now all of us will be able to make insane hard simfiles like bursurk, just because of this correlation between f, g, and t...I can't believe nobody figured this out before...
(Fame

=Gabber

*Skill^-2

)^2 (fame is always directly proportional to the number of retarded zerglings, where gabber is their death rate and talent ends up being the amount of kills you get.)
Err i think i screwed up your equation somewhere...
But if you work mine out long enough, you can prove the existence of jackalopes.

dAnceguy117 · 03-15-2006, 01:41 PM

Isn't an equation with a negative correlation closer to being accurate than one with a correlation of zero? I dunno math sucks T_T

but yeah this thread would've been much more appropriate like three or four months ago

Foxboy9x · 03-15-2006, 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dAnceguy117

I dunno math sucks T_T

I wholeheartedly agree.

dAnceguy117 · 03-15-2006, 04:14 PM

lol you quoted the T_T like I was being serious

T_T

Foxboy9x · 03-15-2006, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dAnceguy117

T_T

That doesn't change the fact that jackalopes exist. =)

**aperson** · 03-16-2006, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foxboy9x

That doesn't change the fact that jackalopes exist. =)

Or beefalos

Foxboy9x · 03-16-2006, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aperson

Or beefalos

shhhhhhhh!

fenixflamefox · 03-16-2006, 07:58 PM

and winged buffalo?

Foxboy9x · 03-16-2006, 08:13 PM

err....no.

03-15-2006, 12:21 AM	#1
aperson FFR Hall of Fame Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Houston Posts: 3,428	Footmania Given fame F and amount of gabber G as a function of time t dF/dt is directly proportional to dG/dt. however, the correlation between F and talent T is approximately zero and might even be negative. This model is comletely accurate and accounts for the case where T = 0 and values of G and F are both very large, such as with DanTheMan. __________________

03-15-2006, 12:22 AM	#2
Kil- Banned Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: djenmark Posts: 567	Re: Footmania Gj this whole website is doomed.

03-15-2006, 12:24 AM	#3
xMordecaix FFR Player Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: San Antonio, TX Age: 37 Posts: 70	Re: Footmania Lololooooooool __________________

03-15-2006, 12:25 AM	#4
Kles Banned Join Date: Sep 2005 Age: 98 Posts: 834	Re: Footmania But what about when T is huge and G and F are zero?

03-15-2006, 12:31 AM	#6
Kles Banned Join Date: Sep 2005 Age: 98 Posts: 834	Re: Footmania makes sense thanks

03-15-2006, 12:37 AM	#7
flamingspinach FFR Player Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 270	Re: Footmania F isn't zero you hypocrite

03-15-2006, 06:50 AM	#10
Bursurk_Lurk Banned Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: HINT: LOLICON IS ILLEGAL HERE Posts: 2,360	Re: Footmania Thanks for the info

03-15-2006, 07:28 AM	#11
Snapps NO DOUBT GET LOUD Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: California Age: 33 Posts: 5,648	Re: Footmania I am enlightened

03-15-2006, 01:41 PM	#13
dAnceguy117 new hand moves = dab Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: he/they Age: 33 Posts: 10,094	Re: Footmania Isn't an equation with a negative correlation closer to being accurate than one with a correlation of zero? I dunno math sucks T_T but yeah this thread would've been much more appropriate like three or four months ago

03-15-2006, 04:14 PM	#15
dAnceguy117 new hand moves = dab Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: he/they Age: 33 Posts: 10,094	Re: Footmania lol you quoted the T_T like I was being serious T_T

03-16-2006, 07:58 PM	#19
fenixflamefox FFR Player Join Date: May 2003 Location: Wisconsin has people in it Age: 39 Posts: 164	Re: Footmania and winged buffalo? __________________

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)