![]() |
#21 |
x'); DROP TABLE FFR;--
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,332
|
![]() The thing is that life can come in a variety of forms. There are many ways to build a system. Some may be harder to generate than others based on the environment.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
The 40% Iron Chef
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Denver
Age: 33
Posts: 4,894
|
![]() Quote:
I read the article, and just smiled. Obviously things can sustain under conditions that we can't, look at cave dwelling creatures that never see light, ever. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
FFR Player
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver
Age: 35
Posts: 190
|
![]() It's world-shattering news to a few and very surprising to other professionals, but not to the layperson.
Anyway, it's very significant; not that anyone's going to debate that. At least, I hope not. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
You thought I was a GUY?!
![]() ![]() |
![]() I would say that it is significant in the scientific realm, but just because we never saw it before, does not mean that everything is turned on its ear. Yes, a big theory now has an exception, but for all we know, this can not be taken much further. Just because something is different, does not mean you can all of a sudden apply it to every other case and get a new awesome result.
People always want to sensationalize their news, and make it bigger than it is. Why? More research money. They are going to tell you all the things it COULD be used for, before they even test those things. Let's see what they can do with it first. Interesting? Yes. Groundbreaking? Sure. Can be used to change all life as we know it? Probably not. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
FFR Player
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver
Age: 35
Posts: 190
|
![]() Before we get a bunch of misdirected rebuttals I just want to say no one has really made that claim. ("Can be used to change all life as we know it.")
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Banned
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: on the farm
Posts: 1,135
|
![]() i was expecting religion to be brought into this lol, well done folks even though i must admit i do get a giggle out of existential angst
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
FFR Player
|
![]() Like rubix said it isn't anything I wasn't expecting but great to actually know its been found. Anyway great news is great put a smile on my face.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Snek
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas
Age: 34
Posts: 9,192
|
![]() I can only hope this leads to great discovery. We could use some progress in understanding the universe about now.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
⁽ ´ཀ`⁾
![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
edit went back and read the rest of the thread ur right banditcom
__________________
![]() Last edited by pokelda; 12-3-2010 at 09:50 PM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
|
![]()
wait what? the majority of the people in this thread are reacting very positively to the news ?_?
science aside, i think people are reacting to this with so much more interests and enthusiasm than other scientific discoveries because we are culturally fascinated by life. what with all the news stories of life sustainable planets thousands of light years away from us to the coverage of evidence of water existing on mars, its apparent that people want to know if we aren't alone in the universe. the idea of replacing what is considered to be an essential element for life with a substitute does not just exist in the field of academic science, it has also been explored in our culture. Silicon based organisms, replacing carbon as the base element to create various biological chemicals, are featured in many sci fi novels and tv series. famous scientists are known to have given credence to this idea, commenting how life forms may have formed in drastically different ways than we may have thought. this is one of allures of scifi, that we can immerse ourselves in a fantasy universe while making it plausible enough to make the setting believable. the way i see it, I think this news is amazing because to see something from our fantasies come to life, now thats something truly out of this world.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
FFR Simfile Author
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() It's interesting. It's not entirely earth-shattering though. These conditions were artificially induced and decreased cell functionality. Arsenic is known to take the place of phosphorous in chemical reactions, and consequently this is why it's poisonous.
Really, this study just goes to show you how flexible life can be across a broad range of conditions, especially extremophiles! But in reality, we already knew that.
__________________
![]() Last edited by Reach; 12-4-2010 at 11:33 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Banned
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: on the farm
Posts: 1,135
|
![]() reach for the dettox
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
FFR Simfile Author
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() So I spent the last little bit reading through parts of the actual paper.
If you read the paper and not the news articles, there are some problems. I did part of my undergrad in biochemistry and molecular biology, so I can comment on this a little bit. The results suggests that arsenate replaced phosphate in certain conditions. There's however, no evidence this replacement took place in biochemically active DNA/RNA involved in transcription/translation. As such, the incorporation could be biochemically redundant. They need more evidence. Arsenate resembles phosphate structurally, which is why it can take its place chemically. However, it's known to be completely unstable in water. It quickly hydrolyzes (decomposition via reaction with H2O). Instability suggests less than ideal conditions for ever composing biochemically active DNA strands. Interestingly, in the experiment water is completely removed. If the conditions were similar to any natural conditions on earth that contained water, there would have been no results. This is specious at best. As such, I would argue there is a lot of additional research that needs to be done on this subject before we can draw any serious conclusions (which also appears to be the view of the authors of the paper). These organisms could just be storing the arsenic to avoid toxicity, which would also explain the increases in size. Another implication here is that for this to be chemically practical you would need to generate conditions on another planet without water that is high in arsenic but low in phosphate. This is rather unlikely; phosphorous is much more abundant than arsenic. I suppose anything is possible though.
__________________
![]() Last edited by Reach; 12-4-2010 at 11:46 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
plain old ugly ass dumbas
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 27
|
![]()
Marry me.
__________________
Deja Vu is only when they change something... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
FFR Player
|
![]() lmao you want to marry nyokou
__________________
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | |
x'); DROP TABLE FFR;--
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,332
|
![]() Quote:
I didn't read the paper yet out of apathy, but this is interesting to know -- this was exactly what I had been wondering about. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
has nice tits
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 744
|
![]() ![]() I'd wondered where this came from.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
nah
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: nah
Age: 30
Posts: 3,506
|
![]() Quote:
As for the NASA comment, how the **** are you 24 ahahaha.
__________________
nah |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|