Interesting

IAMTHEEVILBEAN · 09-2-2004, 02:22 PM

http://pages.infinit.net/noc/pentagon.swf

jewpinthethird · 09-2-2004, 02:35 PM

Damn, that is Ka-Ray-Zee. I'm going to watch it again.

http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ...1/pentagon.htm

CypherToorima · 09-2-2004, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jewpinthethird

Damn, that is Ka-Ray-Zee. I'm going to watch it again.

http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ...1/pentagon.htm

I concur.

Ka-Ray-Zee.

**aperson** · 09-2-2004, 03:01 PM

It's true because it's on the internet.

**Kilgamayan** · 09-2-2004, 03:04 PM

Is that the video that's a bunch of bullshit about how the Pentagon actually got him by a memory-altering missile?

insomniakxz · 09-2-2004, 03:05 PM

Yes. The government wanted to blow up part of the pentagon on purpose.

CypherToorima · 09-2-2004, 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kilgamayan

Is that the video that's a bunch of bullshit about how the Pentagon actually got him by a memory-altering missile?

Uhh...I don't think so...it just says the pentagon got hit by a missle, then the government (a.k.a. The Mind control machine ot whatever they called it) stated saying it was a plane

@a couple people: They do bring up interesting details that make me suspect it wasn't a boeing 747.

@insomniakxz: Who said government?

Privateer · 09-2-2004, 03:30 PM

It had Starcraft music at the end. That made the entire thing a joke to me. Oh wait...

**lightdarkness** · 09-2-2004, 03:55 PM

I mean, yea it is on the internet and hard to belive, but some of that stuff is just freaky.

Hana_Banana · 09-2-2004, 04:06 PM

It was freaky.

evilbutterfly · 09-2-2004, 04:06 PM

Not everything on the internet is true. Then again, not everything is false, either. This is interesting, as the topic title says, if nothing else. I think I'll watch it again now. I was halfway distracted the first time and it all went by so fast.

Also, even if it was a missile, why does it matter? Let's say it was a terrorist missile (very doubtful). What would be accomplished by telling people that? It would just cause panic because people would know that our enemies could have weapons in our own country and be ready to kill us with them. Whatever launched that missile could launch another, and it could kill more of us. That would cause panic. Or, say it was just an accident, a military test gone wrong or a misfire from some USA jet. That would make us look bad. It would make people lose faith in the military, which (obviously) was going to go to war with whoever could be blamed for the WTC attacks, which is not what this country needed. However, if they just said it was a jet, it would cause less panic. We all already saw 2 jets fly into the WTC, so we knew it could happen. Plus, people wouldn't be scared of everything, just planes. Saying it was a missile would cause lots of panic, because it could be snuck in and fired at us from anywhere. With planes you just tighten security and keep an eye on possible hijackers. It scared people out of flying for a while, but we weren't completely devastated. If we knew for a fact that a missile hit the Pentagon the US would probably STILL be scared out of their minds.

Hence, even if it was a missile of some sort, I for one don't give a rat's ass if they lied about it. Part of the government's job is to avoid hysteria and keep people calm and happy. It's like in Men in Black. There were aliens all over the place, but they kept them a secret because most people couldn't handle the truth, and it would just cause panic. Just think of during the Cold War. Those "duck and cover" ads were pure bullshit. Getting under your desk won't save you from a nuclear bomb's explosion, but thinking it would made people feel safe and they kept about their daily reutine. Although I'd rather know the truth, I'd MUCH rather have the general public be ignorant of the dangers. People panicking is NOT fun.

jewpinthethird · 09-2-2004, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aperson

It's true because it's on the internet.

Truest statement ever.

insomniakxz · 09-2-2004, 06:03 PM

...but where is the plane that was supposedly the one which crased into the pentagon, then?

LEGO · 09-2-2004, 06:47 PM

There wasn't one?

09-2-2004, 07:24 PM

What about the families of the people who were on the plane that crashed into the building?

Moved to Critical Thinking because it belongs there.

VashtheGunman7 · 09-2-2004, 07:39 PM

That is freaky.......... heh Mind control Machine

insomniakxz · 09-2-2004, 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chardish

What about the families of the people who were on the plane that crashed into the building?

Moved to Critical Thinking because it belongs there.

exactly. It's not much a suprise that the flash movie didn't explain nor consider that point...

Afrobean · 09-2-2004, 08:10 PM

Yes, it is interesting. The thing I don't like is that is raises more questions than it answers, like about the family members of those who were supposed to have been on the plane. Sure, there may have been no plane, but what did crash into it then? And where's the proof of this missile or whatever? Also, it didn't seem to have a point.

**Squeek** · 09-2-2004, 08:12 PM

I love "conspiracy theories" like this because the opposing group gets so much information out that is almost unrefutable onto the table and says, "Look what I've found out. Explain it better than I can."

The best one I saw (non-sarcastically here) was a special on FOX about how we never landed on the moon. The evidence made so much sense that it was hard not to believe. Just like this.

I'm not saying his theory about "mind-control" is accurate, but his "missile" theory holds up with his supporting evidence. All it takes is an open mind and some logical thinking to see this kind of stuff. Of course, now the author of this video is deemed "a lunatic" because he's trying to prove that what happened on a major day in history was falsified. Just like the dude on FOX who is now like completely censored out.

~Squeek

CalibreneGuru · 09-2-2004, 08:17 PM

The movie wasn't trying to explain what happened on that day, it is pointing out what the author believes DID NOT happen. He backs up his statements with evidence that is rather interesting. Whether it is true or not we may never know. The government can't be trusted on all things.

09-2-2004, 02:22 PM	#1
IAMTHEEVILBEAN FFR Player Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Michigan Posts: 3,078	Interesting http://pages.infinit.net/noc/pentagon.swf

09-2-2004, 03:01 PM	#4
aperson FFR Hall of Fame Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Houston Posts: 3,428	It's true because it's on the internet. __________________

09-2-2004, 03:04 PM	#5
Kilgamayan Super Scooter Happy Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Location, Location. Age: 39 Posts: 6,583	Is that the video that's a bunch of bullshit about how the Pentagon actually got him by a memory-altering missile? __________________ I watched clouds awobbly from the floor o' that kayak. Souls cross ages like clouds cross skies, an' tho' a cloud's shape nor hue nor size don't stay the same, it's still a cloud an' so is a soul. Who can say where the cloud's blowed from or who the soul'll be 'morrow? Only Sonmi the east an' the west an' the compass an' the atlas, yay, only the atlas o' clouds.

09-2-2004, 03:30 PM	#8
Privateer FFR Player Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: NJ Posts: 2,962	It had Starcraft music at the end. That made the entire thing a joke to me. Oh wait... __________________

09-2-2004, 03:55 PM	#9
lightdarkness Summer!! Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: New York Age: 35 Posts: 11,308	I mean, yea it is on the internet and hard to belive, but some of that stuff is just freaky. __________________

09-2-2004, 02:35 PM	#2
jewpinthethird (The Fat's Sabobah) Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Palm Springs, California Posts: 11,711	Damn, that is Ka-Ray-Zee. I'm going to watch it again. http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ...1/pentagon.htm

09-2-2004, 03:05 PM	#6
insomniakxz FFR Player Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: VA Posts: 302	Yes. The government wanted to blow up part of the pentagon on purpose.

09-2-2004, 04:06 PM	#10
Hana_Banana FFR Player Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Your pants. Posts: 1	It was freaky.

09-2-2004, 04:06 PM	#11
evilbutterfly FFR Player Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Small town, TN Age: 37 Posts: 5,784	Not everything on the internet is true. Then again, not everything is false, either. This is interesting, as the topic title says, if nothing else. I think I'll watch it again now. I was halfway distracted the first time and it all went by so fast. Also, even if it was a missile, why does it matter? Let's say it was a terrorist missile (very doubtful). What would be accomplished by telling people that? It would just cause panic because people would know that our enemies could have weapons in our own country and be ready to kill us with them. Whatever launched that missile could launch another, and it could kill more of us. That would cause panic. Or, say it was just an accident, a military test gone wrong or a misfire from some USA jet. That would make us look bad. It would make people lose faith in the military, which (obviously) was going to go to war with whoever could be blamed for the WTC attacks, which is not what this country needed. However, if they just said it was a jet, it would cause less panic. We all already saw 2 jets fly into the WTC, so we knew it could happen. Plus, people wouldn't be scared of everything, just planes. Saying it was a missile would cause lots of panic, because it could be snuck in and fired at us from anywhere. With planes you just tighten security and keep an eye on possible hijackers. It scared people out of flying for a while, but we weren't completely devastated. If we knew for a fact that a missile hit the Pentagon the US would probably STILL be scared out of their minds. Hence, even if it was a missile of some sort, I for one don't give a rat's ass if they lied about it. Part of the government's job is to avoid hysteria and keep people calm and happy. It's like in Men in Black. There were aliens all over the place, but they kept them a secret because most people couldn't handle the truth, and it would just cause panic. Just think of during the Cold War. Those "duck and cover" ads were pure bullshit. Getting under your desk won't save you from a nuclear bomb's explosion, but thinking it would made people feel safe and they kept about their daily reutine. Although I'd rather know the truth, I'd MUCH rather have the general public be ignorant of the dangers. People panicking is NOT fun. __________________ So I've gone completely slack-ass and haven't done any work on creating games. =( In less-depressing news, I got a job for an online business (which sells non-electronic games, of all things!) which has taught me a lot about marketing online and all that jazz. So now I'm on Twitter @NoahWright. And I write the blog for their website. Plus I do cool programming in-house that you'll never see. =O

09-2-2004, 06:03 PM	#13
insomniakxz FFR Player Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: VA Posts: 302	...but where is the plane that was supposedly the one which crased into the pentagon, then?

09-2-2004, 06:47 PM	#14
LEGO Banned Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: In the Mountains Posts: 994	There wasn't one?

09-2-2004, 07:24 PM	#15
User6773 Guest Posts: n/a	What about the families of the people who were on the plane that crashed into the building? Moved to Critical Thinking because it belongs there.

09-2-2004, 07:39 PM	#16
VashtheGunman7 FFR Player Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Southern Cross(Fist of the Northstar) Posts: 456	That is freaky.......... heh Mind control Machine __________________

09-2-2004, 08:10 PM	#18
Afrobean Admiral in the Red Army Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: the moon Age: 36 Posts: 13,262	Yes, it is interesting. The thing I don't like is that is raises more questions than it answers, like about the family members of those who were supposed to have been on the plane. Sure, there may have been no plane, but what did crash into it then? And where's the proof of this missile or whatever? Also, it didn't seem to have a point. __________________

09-2-2004, 08:12 PM	#19
Squeek let it snow~ Join Date: Jan 2004 Age: 37 Posts: 14,444	I love "conspiracy theories" like this because the opposing group gets so much information out that is almost unrefutable onto the table and says, "Look what I've found out. Explain it better than I can." The best one I saw (non-sarcastically here) was a special on FOX about how we never landed on the moon. The evidence made so much sense that it was hard not to believe. Just like this. I'm not saying his theory about "mind-control" is accurate, but his "missile" theory holds up with his supporting evidence. All it takes is an open mind and some logical thinking to see this kind of stuff. Of course, now the author of this video is deemed "a lunatic" because he's trying to prove that what happened on a major day in history was falsified. Just like the dude on FOX who is now like completely censored out. ~Squeek

09-2-2004, 08:17 PM	#20
CalibreneGuru FFR Player Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 108	The movie wasn't trying to explain what happened on that day, it is pointing out what the author believes DID NOT happen. He backs up his statements with evidence that is rather interesting. Whether it is true or not we may never know. The government can't be trusted on all things.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)