TWG XLVII: 28 Half-dozen Hours Later - Page 4

**Kilgamayan** · 05-29-2007, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DiscoBobbyPARANOiA

As far as fakes coming to me, I have a method of determining if SWAT claims are legit, which I won't post on the thread. But be warned, if you fake SWAT to me, I WILL know, and you WILL die today.

I do hope you realize how thin a line you're walking. Don't forget about the "no using PM specifics to determine roles" rule.

As for the game proper, it ain't easy being green, so I have no qualms riding some coattails. >_>

**roundbox** · 05-29-2007, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DiscoBobbyPARANOiA

DONT Tizzy ANYONE Yo ROLE . Real *****s recognize the realness.. I DONT CARE IF YOU Wizzy TO BE TURNED INTO A VAMPIRE, I DONT CARE IF YOU HAVE A CRAPPY Rizzle so you betta run and grab yo glock. I DONT CARE IF YOU THINK Yo ROLE IS USELESS.

HYPOCRITE

DiscoBobbyPARANOiA · 05-29-2007, 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kilgamayan

I do hope you realize how thin a line you're walking. Don't forget about the "no using PM specifics to determine roles" rule.

As for the game proper, it ain't easy being green, so I have no qualms riding some coattails. >_>

I won't be 'using PM specifics to determine roles' so there's nothing to worry about.

Quote:

Originally Posted by roundbox

HYPOCRITE

Telling one random person on N1 that you're a scientist, and telling the thread what your role is are two COMPLETELY different things. Eat my ass.

edubardus · 05-29-2007, 09:13 PM

I'm still worried about Stoic mentioning that the roles don't have all the information they could have. This alone leads me to think if there's any possible effect to guarding a zombie, blue, human. Who knows.

**talisman** · 05-29-2007, 11:40 PM

It'd be ****ty though if a swat was zombie'd last night and went to dbp.

**talisman** · 05-29-2007, 11:49 PM

dbp, if you didn't guard this scientist last night (assuming then that you met the scientist later), who did you guard? This will at least decrease that person's chances of being a zombie and help vote-wise.

StoicRoivaS · 05-30-2007, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rioting

I was trying to come up with a method of validating two people who claim to have the same role -- they'd need to be asked a question that only someone with that role can answer. I don't think it'd be allowed - but if they could share the character length of their role PM with a 3rd party, that 3rd party could validate them. The problem all comes down to trust - with the possible existence of mystery roles, a MW role, and unknown quantities of roles.

Please note that this is clearly within the realm of "PM ******ry" as kefit so eloquently put it. This method is more than against the rules and would not be tolerated to any degree. I trust DBP's "method" is more nicely positioned within the rules, though at the moment I don't see how it would be. Carry on.

Kefit · 05-30-2007, 12:36 AM

STOP BEING ****ING MORONS PEOPLE JESUS THE RULES AREN'T THAT COMPLICATED

ps hi

X3R0H0UR · 05-30-2007, 12:41 AM

so does DBP's change in opinion on coming out seem like he got changed factions, or is it just me?

PS: in b4 "it is just you"

DBP has been blatant about his roles to hide in the open before...see the dimensional analysis game...

DiscoBobbyPARANOiA · 05-30-2007, 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by talisman

dbp, if you didn't guard this scientist last night (assuming then that you met the scientist later), who did you guard? This will at least decrease that person's chances of being a zombie and help vote-wise.

That will not help at this time, so I'll keep it to myself.

Quote:

Originally Posted by X3R0H0UR

so does DBP's change in opinion on coming out seem like he got changed factions, or is it just me?

PS: in b4 "it is just you"

DBP has been blatant about his roles to hide in the open before...see the dimensional analysis game...

My change was because I figured out a way to determine if a person was faking SWAT when contacting me, I already said that, I think.

DiscoBobbyPARANOiA · 05-30-2007, 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kefit

STOP BEING ****ING MORONS PEOPLE JESUS THE RULES AREN'T THAT COMPLICATED

ps hi

sup kefit. You should play sometime instead of just dropping by and owning people

**xObserveRx** · 05-30-2007, 10:54 AM

Didn't it say somewhere that SWAT guys would only suffer from lots of attacks?

"Multiple attacks on these players could prove dangerous." or something to that extent. Which reminds me: Where the hell did the thread describing this game go? I can't seem to find it anymore.

**roundbox** · 05-30-2007, 11:33 AM

http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/...96#post1540000

**roundbox** · 05-30-2007, 11:35 AM

What the hell
It always redirects me to my THE GAME post(which I just lost)
Just scroll up if it happens. Same thread, same page

StoicRoivaS · 05-30-2007, 02:53 PM

*Strolls in to check the lynch votes a mere 2 hours before the deadline*

better (0) - DBP
Tests on their DNA may return false (1) - Manti
haha I just lost THE GAME (1) - Roundbox
COMPLETELY (1) - DBP
"Multiple attacks on these players could prove dangerous." (1) - Observer

I don't know if we have that many boxes...

But for real, unless over half of you vote in the next 2 hours, the deadline is extended until midnight at least.

P.S. I know that joke is terribly old, so feel free to point it out anyways.

**roundbox** · 05-30-2007, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StoicRoivaS

haha I just lost THE GAME (1) - Roundbox

shit

**Kilgamayan** · 05-30-2007, 03:36 PM

Writing something up now, don't start doing a whole bunch of stupid **** that throws off my counts.

**Kilgamayan** · 05-30-2007, 04:05 PM

All right, unless DBP produces a name I guess we have to work with the next-to-nothing we have.

Trying to guess at the progenitor is a complete crapshoot, so I'm going to ignore it for now.

Who would have been marked? Let's look at the player list:

1. Sert
2. Kilga
3. x3ro
4. Talisman
5. Manti
6. Flaw
7. Pnt
8. Yesssss
9. FoJar
10. Fiction
11. Roundbox
12. Thunder
13. Stella
14. Observer
15. Rioting
16. DBP

First and foremorest, I'm tossing myself and DBP out for obvious reasons. >_>

It is difficult to decide how to continue. With the recommended "chain of command" idea and the complete lack of night deaths, just about anyone could make a viable target. As it is, I believe a mark on a strong player last night would be a silly thing to do, because they are the most likely to be protected and/or tested on. To me, this is talisman and FoJaR. There are a few more players I consider strong players and would not mark were I in charge of the decision making but that opinion is not necessarily shared gamewide.

1. Sert
3. x3ro
5. Manti
6. Flaw
7. Pnt
8. Yesssss
10. Fiction
11. Roundbox
12. Thunder
13. Stella
14. Observer
15. Rioting

Next, I'm going to eliminate the players most likely to attract suspicion. This is not necessarily a decision made based on skill level, and nothing here is personal, so I please ask no one here take offense. To me, these people are X3RO, pnt, Fiction, Thuinder and Observer.

1. Sert
5. Manti
6. Flaw
8. Yesssss
11. Roundbox
13. Stella
15. Rioting

Of these remaining people, in order of greatest to least, if I were in charge of marking, I would pick in this order:

Yesssss
sert
Stella
Flaw
Manti
Rioting
Roundbox

The decision-making list is based on a combination of skill level, reputation and performance (if any) in recent games.

Now I will examine the activity of each of these 7 players.

Yesssss: 2 posts (1.5 thoughtful, 1 daytime)
sert: 0 posts
Stella: 3 posts (3 night screwaround)
Flaw: 4 posts (2 nighttime casual convo, 2 daytime (1 thoughtful))
Manti: 3 posts (3 daytime (1.5 thoughtful)
Rioting: 2 posts (2 daytime, 1.5 thoughtful)
Roundbox (oh jesus): 12 posts (6 night time (2 screwaround), 6 daytime (2.5 screwaround))

sertman at 0 posts makes me want to go right after him, but paying absolutely no attention isn't an indicator of getting marked.

Stella makes me think she could be the progenitor but eh.

Right now I'm going to vote rioting. Of that list of players he seems to be doing the best job of blending in without garnering too much attention.

sertman · 05-30-2007, 04:17 PM

whoops maybe it was a bad idea to sign up for this game during graduation week <_<

oh well uh brb reading the thread

**talisman** · 05-30-2007, 05:22 PM

yeah let's extend this **** to midnight. days should always end on midnights.

05-29-2007, 09:13 PM	#64
edubardus RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGEEEEEEE Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Scarlet Devil Mansion Age: 35 Posts: 797	Re: TWG XLVII: 28 Half-dozen Hours Later I'm still worried about Stoic mentioning that the roles don't have all the information they could have. This alone leads me to think if there's any possible effect to guarding a zombie, blue, human. Who knows. __________________ Last edited by bluguerrilla : Today at 08:51 PM. Reason: edubardus/

05-29-2007, 11:40 PM	#65
talisman Resident Penguin Join Date: May 2003 Age: 37 Posts: 4,598	Re: TWG XLVII: 28 Half-dozen Hours Later It'd be ****ty though if a swat was zombie'd last night and went to dbp.

05-29-2007, 11:49 PM	#66
talisman Resident Penguin Join Date: May 2003 Age: 37 Posts: 4,598	Re: TWG XLVII: 28 Half-dozen Hours Later dbp, if you didn't guard this scientist last night (assuming then that you met the scientist later), who did you guard? This will at least decrease that person's chances of being a zombie and help vote-wise.

05-30-2007, 12:41 AM	#69
X3R0H0UR FFR Player Join Date: Jan 2007 Age: 39 Posts: 540	Re: TWG XLVII: 28 Half-dozen Hours Later so does DBP's change in opinion on coming out seem like he got changed factions, or is it just me? PS: in b4 "it is just you" DBP has been blatant about his roles to hide in the open before...see the dimensional analysis game... __________________ Gynecologist, Saturday nights only.

05-30-2007, 10:54 AM	#72
xObserveRx FFR Simfile Author Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Ontario Age: 41 Posts: 1,148	Re: TWG XLVII: 28 Half-dozen Hours Later Didn't it say somewhere that SWAT guys would only suffer from lots of attacks? "Multiple attacks on these players could prove dangerous." or something to that extent. Which reminds me: Where the hell did the thread describing this game go? I can't seem to find it anymore. __________________ Come Play The Werewolf Game!

05-30-2007, 02:53 PM	#75
StoicRoivaS FFR Player Join Date: May 2006 Location: OC Age: 39 Posts: 548	Re: TWG XLVII: 28 Half-dozen Hours Later Strolls in to check the lynch votes a mere 2 hours before the deadline better (0) - DBP Tests on their DNA may return false (1) - Manti haha I just lost THE GAME (1) - Roundbox COMPLETELY (1) - DBP "Multiple attacks on these players could prove dangerous." (1) - Observer I don't know if we have that many boxes... But for real, unless over half of you vote in the next 2 hours, the deadline is extended until midnight at least. P.S. I know that joke is terribly old, so feel free to point it out anyways. __________________ Like the moon over the day, my genius and brawn are wasted on these fools. ~Haiku -Bowser

05-30-2007, 03:36 PM	#77
Kilgamayan Super Scooter Happy Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Location, Location. Age: 39 Posts: 6,583	Re: TWG XLVII: 28 Half-dozen Hours Later Writing something up now, don't start doing a whole bunch of stupid **** that throws off my counts. __________________ I watched clouds awobbly from the floor o' that kayak. Souls cross ages like clouds cross skies, an' tho' a cloud's shape nor hue nor size don't stay the same, it's still a cloud an' so is a soul. Who can say where the cloud's blowed from or who the soul'll be 'morrow? Only Sonmi the east an' the west an' the compass an' the atlas, yay, only the atlas o' clouds.

05-30-2007, 04:05 PM	#78
Kilgamayan Super Scooter Happy Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Location, Location. Age: 39 Posts: 6,583	Re: TWG XLVII: 28 Half-dozen Hours Later All right, unless DBP produces a name I guess we have to work with the next-to-nothing we have. Trying to guess at the progenitor is a complete crapshoot, so I'm going to ignore it for now. Who would have been marked? Let's look at the player list: 1. Sert 2. Kilga 3. x3ro 4. Talisman 5. Manti 6. Flaw 7. Pnt 8. Yesssss 9. FoJar 10. Fiction 11. Roundbox 12. Thunder 13. Stella 14. Observer 15. Rioting 16. DBP First and foremorest, I'm tossing myself and DBP out for obvious reasons. >_> It is difficult to decide how to continue. With the recommended "chain of command" idea and the complete lack of night deaths, just about anyone could make a viable target. As it is, I believe a mark on a strong player last night would be a silly thing to do, because they are the most likely to be protected and/or tested on. To me, this is talisman and FoJaR. There are a few more players I consider strong players and would not mark were I in charge of the decision making but that opinion is not necessarily shared gamewide. 1. Sert 3. x3ro 5. Manti 6. Flaw 7. Pnt 8. Yesssss 10. Fiction 11. Roundbox 12. Thunder 13. Stella 14. Observer 15. Rioting Next, I'm going to eliminate the players most likely to attract suspicion. This is not necessarily a decision made based on skill level, and nothing here is personal, so I please ask no one here take offense. To me, these people are X3RO, pnt, Fiction, Thuinder and Observer. 1. Sert 5. Manti 6. Flaw 8. Yesssss 11. Roundbox 13. Stella 15. Rioting Of these remaining people, in order of greatest to least, if I were in charge of marking, I would pick in this order: Yesssss sert Stella Flaw Manti Rioting Roundbox The decision-making list is based on a combination of skill level, reputation and performance (if any) in recent games. Now I will examine the activity of each of these 7 players. Yesssss: 2 posts (1.5 thoughtful, 1 daytime) sert: 0 posts Stella: 3 posts (3 night screwaround) Flaw: 4 posts (2 nighttime casual convo, 2 daytime (1 thoughtful)) Manti: 3 posts (3 daytime (1.5 thoughtful) Rioting: 2 posts (2 daytime, 1.5 thoughtful) Roundbox (oh jesus): 12 posts (6 night time (2 screwaround), 6 daytime (2.5 screwaround)) sertman at 0 posts makes me want to go right after him, but paying absolutely no attention isn't an indicator of getting marked. Stella makes me think she could be the progenitor but eh. Right now I'm going to vote rioting. Of that list of players he seems to be doing the best job of blending in without garnering too much attention. __________________ I watched clouds awobbly from the floor o' that kayak. Souls cross ages like clouds cross skies, an' tho' a cloud's shape nor hue nor size don't stay the same, it's still a cloud an' so is a soul. Who can say where the cloud's blowed from or who the soul'll be 'morrow? Only Sonmi the east an' the west an' the compass an' the atlas, yay, only the atlas o' clouds.

05-30-2007, 04:17 PM	#79
sertman DADALADAH Join Date: Jun 2005 Age: 35 Posts: 3,910	Re: TWG XLVII: 28 Half-dozen Hours Later whoops maybe it was a bad idea to sign up for this game during graduation week <_< oh well uh brb reading the thread __________________

05-30-2007, 05:22 PM	#80
talisman Resident Penguin Join Date: May 2003 Age: 37 Posts: 4,598	Re: TWG XLVII: 28 Half-dozen Hours Later yeah let's extend this **** to midnight. days should always end on midnights.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)