actually i would pick the new 2 over the OT (original trilogy) any day of the week... I was good and II was great.. but I believe that III is going to be the crowning glory of the 6..
RAVEnHEXa: Lip ring is because I want to be a professional piercer.
87x: more like.. professional goth.
I'm sick of people bashing Ep I and II because it's trendy to do so...Ep II was great, and Ep I was good but still the worst of the 5 so far. It doesn't make it a bad movie.
Ep II's only fault was bad acting, which all the movies have, so ha.
I'm sick of people bashing Ep I and II because it's trendy to do so...Ep II was great, and Ep I was good but still the worst of the 5 so far. It doesn't make it a bad movie.
Ep II's only fault was bad acting, which all the movies have, so ha.
I blame Episode 2 on the ridiculous overuse of CGI. Example: Remember that scene where they were talking to Yoda and he was on the pod thing? EVERYTHING in the background was so CGI you could smell it. Lucas didnt even make a complete scene set, he just had the CGI crew whip something up for the sake of CGI.
Episode I was not my thing. Watchable, certainly, but not...STAR WARS. Episode two was significantly better. They WERE a bit heavy on the CGI, but I don't think it was that bad. Some of the scripting and MOSTLY the acting in 1 was pretty bad. Worse than The SW trilogy. But II had some pretty nifty things in it.
I
Ep II's only fault was bad acting, which all the movies have, so ha.
But Mark Hamill seemed like a genius after seeing the latest one.
Originally posted by Henri Poincaré
The scientist does not study nature because it is useful to do so. He studies it because he takes pleasure in it, and he takes pleasure in it because it is beautiful.
Comment