REJOICE, STAR WARS FANS

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 1-4-4
    FFR Player
    • Nov 2003
    • 205

    #16
    That's interesting.

    Comment

    • Anticrombie0909
      FFR Player
      • Jul 2003
      • 4683

      #17
      Episode I and II were both horrible. Not only were they CG'd through the roof (blatantly, may I add), the acting was terrible and the love story in Ep II pissed me off. I didn't pay $7.50 to watch a two hour soap opera between an ugly thirteen year old and his creepy crush on an equally ugly older chick.

      Comment

      • jewpinthethird
        (The Fat's Sabobah)
        FFR Music Producer
        • Nov 2002
        • 11711

        #18
        Natalie Portman is not ugly! WTF?

        Comment

        • Anticrombie0909
          FFR Player
          • Jul 2003
          • 4683

          #19


          Ugly.

          Comment

          • User6773

            #20
            AMAZING POWERS OF FORUM PRESCIENCE
            This is the part where someone finds a photo of her in that scene in front of the fireplace with her breasts barely concealed and posts it as a counterpoint.

            Comment

            • QreepyBORIS
              FFR Player
              • Feb 2003
              • 7454

              #21
              Sounds about right.

              Except I don't remember that.


              Natalie Portman is pretty good looking. Not, I might add, when she is dressed like that.

              And the lipstick is kinda like wtf?

              Signature subject to change.

              THE ZERRRRRG.

              Comment

              • RobbyZero
                FFR Player
                • Sep 2003
                • 4613

                #22
                4,5,6 were best kthx.

                1 and 2 = decent..

                3 = yet to be released!

                Comment

                Working...