TWGTurbo 32: The TWG Train Rolls All Night Long GAME THREAD

[roundbox]

pls do not vote out my partner freezin
I have to defend him now that he's afk...........

[the sun fan]

Originally Posted by roundbox

pls do not vote out my partner freezin
I have to defend him now that he's afk...........

knew it
I'm stealing all of charu's cred this was ALL ME BABY

[star-crossed]

Originally Posted by roundbox

pls do not vote out my partner freezin
I have to defend him now that he's afk...........

Ha ha.

But seriously, I think saying your read is based on if he shows up or not is questionable. It seems better to keep to yourself unless your actual motivation is to present pretty analysis and be fake helpful. Particularly since he claims whether he shows up is based on whether he is awake or not, which could have nothing to do with his role??

[star-crossed]

I am going to vote raeko. Hopecaster, roundbox, Freezin are my other top candidates at this time.

Unrelatedly, I am sad nobody took the bait for my planned shitposting, but the moment has passed now.

[the sun fan]

Originally Posted by star-crossed

Unrelatedly, I am sad nobody took the bait for my planned shitposting, but the moment has passed now.

just do it anyways tbh

[star-crossed]

Originally Posted by the sun fan

just do it anyways tbh

I actually needed to know somebody's birthday and even if they told me now I do not have time to follow through on it.

[roundbox]

Originally Posted by star-crossed

I actually needed to know somebody's birthday and even if they told me now I do not have time to follow through on it.

July 17th

[mellon_collie]

Originally Posted by roundbox

July 17th

stop

[roundbox]

Originally Posted by star-crossed

Ha ha.

But seriously, I think saying your read is based on if he shows up or not is questionable. It seems better to keep to yourself unless your actual motivation is to present pretty analysis and be fake helpful. Particularly since he claims whether he shows up is based on whether he is awake or not, which could have nothing to do with his role??

The final post he made before he left implied he might not be back, so he knew that the vote he had on xel was going to make it to the end. Me saying he's TWTBAW implies I'm townreading him, and my read would probably change if he showed up and started posting. It would obviously depend on what he reenters with, but I gave my read on him at the present moment and said it would be null if he started posting again.

[star-crossed]

Originally Posted by roundbox

The final post he made before he left implied he might not be back, so he knew that the vote he had on xel was going to make it to the end. Me saying he's TWTBAW implies I'm townreading him, and my read would probably change if he showed up and started posting. It would obviously depend on what he reenters with, but I gave my read on him at the present moment and said it would be null if he started posting again.

I appreciate the explanation but it does not really change my standpoint that it is essentially encouraging him to pretend not to be here even if he can be here, if you defend him with the caveat in advance? Perhaps I did take "it's game time" more aggressively than you meant it.

Ironically I think it is too obvious for you to be partnered, but one of you being a wolf would not be strange to me.

Raeko has been fun, but I suspect her a bit and think she deserves more attention.

[SubaruPoptart]

Originally Posted by star-crossed

I appreciate the explanation but it does not really change my standpoint that it is essentially encouraging him to pretend not to be here even if he can be here, if you defend him with the caveat in advance? Perhaps I did take "it's game time" more aggressively than you meant it.

But yeah like, why isn't it you started them null because they're not here and then if they come back, based on what they say switch them either way? Cuz there's probably some meta I wasn't there for but if it's not that I'm lost

[roundbox]

Originally Posted by star-crossed

I appreciate the explanation but it does not really change my standpoint that it is essentially encouraging him to pretend not to be here even if he can be here, if you defend him with the caveat in advance? Perhaps I did take "it's game time" more aggressively than you meant it.

I think any reads on an AFK are bound to change once they return. People do reads on AFKs like this all the time; is this not similar?

Originally Posted by SubaruPoptart

But yeah like, why isn't it you started them null because they're not here and then if they come back, based on what they say switch them either way? Cuz there's probably some meta I wasn't there for but if it's not that I'm lost

I read him leaving whilst knowing he has an active vote on xelnya AND admitting he might sleep through EOD as too wolfy sounding to actually be wolfy

see above for the rest of the explanation

[star-crossed]

Originally Posted by roundbox

I think any reads on an AFK are bound to change once they return. People do reads on AFKs like this all the time; is this not similar?



I read him leaving whilst knowing he has an active vote on xelnya AND admitting he might sleep through EOD as too wolfy sounding to actually be wolfy

see above for the rest of the explanation

Yes I think it is different when you specify it preemptively, but I have explained this already, so I feel we are just going in circles.

I need a vote count, I am lost.