Definition of a FFR AA

[benny58624]

Originally Posted by xXOpkillerXx

Oh nice, can you please give some examples of those scores in here ? In fact, after some discussion on the % on discord, 90% definitely IS far too low for most charts. When I get access to my laptop I will compute the average raw score % that a SDG represents on all files, and feom there we could adjust the AA % to be something lower.

The tier points page gives a nice comparison of obtained raw score and maximum possible raw score for a bunch of files. I see I've managed to get a 93885/104000 = 90.3% score on System Doctor. Not sure when I got it, but to compare: I'm mid-high D4 now, and should definitely NOT be able to get AA on a difficulty 101 file.

Other examples:
92.8% Revolutionary Etude
90.3% A Quick Death
92.7% Grist
91.0% Magical 8bit Tour
91.0% Schmollbluk
... and more.

For a 1000 notes file, a SDG equals a score of 99.51+%.

[xXOpkillerXx]

Originally Posted by benny58624

The tier points page gives a nice comparison of obtained raw score and maximum possible raw score for a bunch of files. I see I've managed to get a 93885/104000 = 90.3% score on System Doctor. Not sure when I got it, but to compare: I'm mid-high D4 now, and should definitely NOT be able to get AA on a difficulty 101 file.

Other examples:
92.8% Revolutionary Etude
90.3% A Quick Death
92.7% Grist
91.0% Magical 8bit Tour
91.0% Schmollbluk
... and more

Great, thanks for the info ! A more accurate estimate has been made at around 97%, considering an SDG on a 1500 notes chart is 99.333%. On that same notecount, a 97% would mean 90 raw goods, and on a chart with 3000 notes it would be 180 raw goods.

[xXOpkillerXx]

My bad if the raw goods counts in my examples are wrong, typing quickly on phone.

The idea remains that the % for AA should be agreed on w.r.t. the average notecount to be as representative as possible.

[Dynam0]

Originally Posted by xXOpkillerXx

My bad if the raw goods counts in my examples are wrong, typing quickly on phone.

The idea remains that the % for AA should be agreed on w.r.t. the average notecount to be as representative as possible.

I can't see a better way than this...though you will still have those anomalous files that have a huge skill gap to go from AA -> SDG (System Doctor is a great example, very farmable as it is for skill rating lol) and then other files that you can improve drastically on with a small skill increase (stamina intensive and marathon files)

I don't see anything wrong with the idea though since all we're doing is counting the AA's and not assigning ratings to them based on difficulty

[xXOpkillerXx]

Originally Posted by Dynam0

I can't see a better way than this...though you will still have those anomalous files that have a huge skill gap to go from AA -> SDG (System Doctor is a great example, very farmable as it is for skill rating lol) and then other files that you can improve drastically on with a small skill increase (stamina intensive and marathon files)

I don't see anything wrong with the idea though since all we're doing is counting the AA's and not assigning ratings to them based on difficulty

Yeah the flaws of our AAA system shouldnt be applied to this since it would purely be a rough measure of "did you get a somewhat decent score". It still suffers from the same-ish chart structure I mentionned in the OP yes, but I dont think it's important given the goal of the metric.