TWG VII Postgame Banter - Page 3

**Kilgamayan** · 01-3-2005, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lightdarkness

It's because I didn't know the role!

That's exactly why it's cheating.

And with the way you've been acting about this, I'm starting to think you have ulterior motives for Tass not getting banned.

HansSky · 01-3-2005, 05:25 PM

I'm still stuck on my two picks for wolves these last two games. First game, Cypher. Last game, stretchy. I'm seriously starting to think that all of this 'guessing' isn't just a coincidence anymore.

Don't worry, I'll get over it.

And people: When I said I had IRL issues that prevented me from taking this game so seriously, and making me rack up votes, I wasn't lying. I wouldn't do that shit just to get people's votes off of me. I think that's wrong, to use RL as an excuse to keep you in the game longer. Sure, I wouldn't have minded if I didn't get lynched, but I WASN'T LYING.

Ok, now on to current events.

I really don't like what I'm hearing, and I think Tass needs a break from the game period. Not indefinite, but a few(2) games. No hosting, no playing. So many people are tired of people playing ring around the rosie as he sings and dances. That's not what this game should be about. I think he needs a break, and I moreso, I think WE need a break from him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chardish

[[17:46] Evan: Cypher and Flypie have both wanted to for about 3 games now.
[17:46] Jay: Flypie says she is going to make the game retarded, and cypher wants 24 people in the game

GG LD. I love how you make it sound like the game will suck if Cypher hosts. Flypie said she'll make it retarded. Ok, there are other choices. O noes...we can't pick Cypher because his game will have 24 PEOPLE. WOW. THE ICEBERG HAS HIT. WOMEN AND CHILDREN FIRST.

No. I'm very interested in what Cypher is willing to do with the game. Yes, I am also curious what Tass has to say, but not without punishment. Let him sit out two games(COMPLETELY), and then he can host if he wants.

flypie743 · 01-3-2005, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HansSky

Quote:

Originally Posted by chardish

[[17:46] Evan: Cypher and Flypie have both wanted to for about 3 games now.
[17:46] Jay: Flypie says she is going to make the game retarded, and cypher wants 24 people in the game

GG LD. I love how you make it sound like the game will suck if Cypher hosts. Flypie said she'll make it retarded. Ok, there are other choices. O noes...we can't pick Cypher because his game will have 24 PEOPLE. WOW. THE ICEBERG HAS HIT. WOMEN AND CHILDREN FIRST.

I never said I would make the game retarded. I have no idea what he is talking about.

**Tasselfoot** · 01-3-2005, 05:52 PM

whatever y'all decide, i'm fine with. you want me out for 2 games, i'm out. you want me only not to play, i'll host. i have multiple great ideas, including my current proposal for twg8, with the storyline thought out fairly well so far.

and, as far as i know, LD has no extra incentive to defend me. i have no asked him to, i have not promised him anything, nor will his defense of me gain him any favors if/when i host a twg.

Tps222 · 01-3-2005, 05:57 PM

I say that whoever participated in TWG 7 should vote on Tass's fate, as it seems he is willing to serve whatever his penalty is.

evilbutterfly · 01-3-2005, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HansSky

a few(2) games

No. A few is 3. 2 is a couple.

And how about let's stop arguing about whether he should be banned from hosting. A temp ban from the game is fine with me, but I think the hosting should be left to vote as usual. He can try and host, but if nobody votes for him (and from the looks of it, people won't) then oh well, he won't host.

**lightdarkness** · 01-3-2005, 06:02 PM

24 people will be chaos.

Too many humans, will take to long, to many wolves will guarentee victory.

16 is the perfect number.

And I said retarded because she said "I have some tricks up my sleve" or whatever. She won't tell me what the storyline will be about, nor what roles will be involved. Thats why I called it retarded.

If Tass gets banned, I doubt I will play, because I personally don't like the way the others that want to host are approaching. Perhaps if flypie says what she plans on doing, i'll vote/play. But until then, count me out.

**Kilgamayan** · 01-3-2005, 06:10 PM

Stop trying to pass this game off as if the entire process of setting it up and playing it revolves solely around you and/or Tass.

**lightdarkness** · 01-3-2005, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kilgamayan

Stop trying to pass this game off as if the entire process of setting it up and playing it revolves solely around you and/or Tass.

Um, it doesn't.

I just don't like the way it's going to be played. It's not like others will follow.

evilbutterfly · 01-3-2005, 06:15 PM

The 24 person game will have 3 teams, if I understand correctly. There won't be too many wolves, there will be more confusion and more fun, I think.

**lightdarkness** · 01-3-2005, 06:16 PM

Well then, people need to explain how they would run the game, because just hearing bits and pieces from various sources doesn't help

roopert · 01-3-2005, 06:25 PM

If you find 24 ACTIVE people then it will work fine. Sign-ups last less than an hour these days. Finding 24 is easy. Find 24 good players is a bit more challenging.

01-3-2005, 06:32 PM

Excuse me, LD? Flypie won't tell you what she has planned because she wants it to be a surprise. You therefore assume she's going to screw everything up and you claim that "she said it's going to be retarded."

You're being very, very aggressive about this. Squeek has even just put in his bid for host as well.

I propose that Tass be banned for the next 2 games from either playing or hosting. All in favor, say aye. All opposed, say nay.

Emccky is also guilty of sharing private communications from me with others as well. I propose that he be banned for the next 2 games as well.

I'm not going to make claims about who should and shouldn't be allowed to vote but if you're not a TWG regular it would be in your best interests to keep your mouth shut.

I vote YES on 2-game ban for Tass.
I vote YES on 2-game ban for Emccky.

If you want a longer ban period, make your beliefs known and if there's enough support, we'll adopt that timeframe instead.

**lightdarkness** · 01-3-2005, 06:34 PM

Nay for Tass, Yay for Emccky.

I don't care what you think, I'm not voting for something I don't know about. Would you vote for a president that said "Vote for me, trust me, i'll be good."

Stop fucking jumping on my back.

01-3-2005, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lightdarkness

Would you vote for a president that said "Vote for me, trust me, i'll be good."

No, but I wouldn't call her ideas "retarded" until I had heard them.

flypie743 · 01-3-2005, 06:39 PM

YES for emccky.
YES for Tass.

whorlichan · 01-3-2005, 06:41 PM

I'm not going to vote on this--two games and a bias does not really give me the right mindframe to do so. I will let you all know that if Tass is allowed to host his game (whether next, or in two games, or whatever) it sounds like an excellent idea and I will be joining it if I can make the sign-ups in time.

I haven't played in the last several games because I've been busy (moving across the country and starting at a new school take up loads of time) but I do want to come back and join more TWGs when I'm settled. Yay for wolfdom!

eyespewgreekfire · 01-3-2005, 06:41 PM

Yes for Tass, Yes for Emmccky
And, LD, if you ever host a TWG again, how about Family guy theme?
It would fit perfectly with tass's lone wolf idea also, with stewie being wolf. A bit of writing skill and we have utter hilarity. (yes I know this is semi off topic)

HansSky · 01-3-2005, 06:54 PM

YES for Tass.
YES for emccky.

CypherToorima · 01-3-2005, 06:58 PM

ld, how do you know 16 is the "perfect number" We've played once with 21, it was a bit drawn out, but there weren't 3 teams. I've sent Chardish my basic outline. Once he posts it, you'll have your explination.

01-3-2005, 05:52 PM	#44
Tasselfoot Retired BOSS Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Widget Heaven Age: 40 Posts: 25,184	whatever y'all decide, i'm fine with. you want me out for 2 games, i'm out. you want me only not to play, i'll host. i have multiple great ideas, including my current proposal for twg8, with the storyline thought out fairly well so far. and, as far as i know, LD has no extra incentive to defend me. i have no asked him to, i have not promised him anything, nor will his defense of me gain him any favors if/when i host a twg. __________________ RIP

01-3-2005, 06:02 PM	#47
lightdarkness Summer!! Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: New York Age: 35 Posts: 11,308	24 people will be chaos. Too many humans, will take to long, to many wolves will guarentee victory. 16 is the perfect number. And I said retarded because she said "I have some tricks up my sleve" or whatever. She won't tell me what the storyline will be about, nor what roles will be involved. Thats why I called it retarded. If Tass gets banned, I doubt I will play, because I personally don't like the way the others that want to host are approaching. Perhaps if flypie says what she plans on doing, i'll vote/play. But until then, count me out. __________________

01-3-2005, 06:10 PM	#48
Kilgamayan Super Scooter Happy Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Location, Location. Age: 39 Posts: 6,583	Stop trying to pass this game off as if the entire process of setting it up and playing it revolves solely around you and/or Tass. __________________ I watched clouds awobbly from the floor o' that kayak. Souls cross ages like clouds cross skies, an' tho' a cloud's shape nor hue nor size don't stay the same, it's still a cloud an' so is a soul. Who can say where the cloud's blowed from or who the soul'll be 'morrow? Only Sonmi the east an' the west an' the compass an' the atlas, yay, only the atlas o' clouds.

01-3-2005, 06:15 PM	#50
evilbutterfly FFR Player Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Small town, TN Age: 37 Posts: 5,784	The 24 person game will have 3 teams, if I understand correctly. There won't be too many wolves, there will be more confusion and more fun, I think. __________________ So I've gone completely slack-ass and haven't done any work on creating games. =( In less-depressing news, I got a job for an online business (which sells non-electronic games, of all things!) which has taught me a lot about marketing online and all that jazz. So now I'm on Twitter @NoahWright. And I write the blog for their website. Plus I do cool programming in-house that you'll never see. =O

01-3-2005, 06:16 PM	#51
lightdarkness Summer!! Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: New York Age: 35 Posts: 11,308	Well then, people need to explain how they would run the game, because just hearing bits and pieces from various sources doesn't help __________________

01-3-2005, 05:57 PM	#45
Tps222 FFR Player Join Date: Nov 2004 Age: 33 Posts: 6,167	I say that whoever participated in TWG 7 should vote on Tass's fate, as it seems he is willing to serve whatever his penalty is.

01-3-2005, 06:25 PM	#52
roopert FFR Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Bakersfield, California Posts: 149	If you find 24 ACTIVE people then it will work fine. Sign-ups last less than an hour these days. Finding 24 is easy. Find 24 good players is a bit more challenging. __________________

01-3-2005, 06:32 PM	#53
User6773 Guest Posts: n/a	Excuse me, LD? Flypie won't tell you what she has planned because she wants it to be a surprise. You therefore assume she's going to screw everything up and you claim that "she said it's going to be retarded." You're being very, very aggressive about this. Squeek has even just put in his bid for host as well. I propose that Tass be banned for the next 2 games from either playing or hosting. All in favor, say aye. All opposed, say nay. Emccky is also guilty of sharing private communications from me with others as well. I propose that he be banned for the next 2 games as well. I'm not going to make claims about who should and shouldn't be allowed to vote but if you're not a TWG regular it would be in your best interests to keep your mouth shut. I vote YES on 2-game ban for Tass. I vote YES on 2-game ban for Emccky. If you want a longer ban period, make your beliefs known and if there's enough support, we'll adopt that timeframe instead.

01-3-2005, 06:34 PM	#54
lightdarkness Summer!! Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: New York Age: 35 Posts: 11,308	Nay for Tass, Yay for Emccky. I don't care what you think, I'm not voting for something I don't know about. Would you vote for a president that said "Vote for me, trust me, i'll be good." Stop fucking jumping on my back. __________________

01-3-2005, 06:39 PM	#56
flypie743 FFR Player Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: fairyland Posts: 3,210	YES for emccky. YES for Tass. __________________ IF YOU ARE THE BOMB YOU WILL CLICK THIS and if you dont, you suck.

01-3-2005, 06:41 PM	#57
whorlichan Tiny Plastic Meat Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: The Valley, Los Angeles Age: 40 Posts: 669	I'm not going to vote on this--two games and a bias does not really give me the right mindframe to do so. I will let you all know that if Tass is allowed to host his game (whether next, or in two games, or whatever) it sounds like an excellent idea and I will be joining it if I can make the sign-ups in time. I haven't played in the last several games because I've been busy (moving across the country and starting at a new school take up loads of time) but I do want to come back and join more TWGs when I'm settled. Yay for wolfdom! __________________ Goddess of Chocolate Sauce First ever graduate of the Quetzacoatino Academy for Aspiring Deities My lame LJ My friend Cassie's amazing photography

01-3-2005, 06:41 PM	#58
eyespewgreekfire FFR Player Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 372	Yes for Tass, Yes for Emmccky And, LD, if you ever host a TWG again, how about Family guy theme? It would fit perfectly with tass's lone wolf idea also, with stewie being wolf. A bit of writing skill and we have utter hilarity. (yes I know this is semi off topic) __________________

01-3-2005, 06:54 PM	#59
HansSky FFR Player Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: ----> Age: 36 Posts: 1,925	YES for Tass. YES for emccky. __________________ hi

01-3-2005, 06:58 PM	#60
CypherToorima Boss of all bosses Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Phone Home! Age: 35 Posts: 2,452	ld, how do you know 16 is the "perfect number" We've played once with 21, it was a bit drawn out, but there weren't 3 teams. I've sent Chardish my basic outline. Once he posts it, you'll have your explination. __________________ I'm a figantic gaggot

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)