okay this is like cry time >.<

[devonin]

I will point out though, that there is a very fine line between simply expressing yourself in a unique way, and doing it excessively to troll for reactions from people who've already made their dislike perfectly clear.

[kiwisimms]

By the way guys...kiwi has been playing at school. It's addictive and it's sad that I can't play at home. I so wish kiwi could. It'd make for a more fun night.

Originally Posted by devonin

I will point out though, that there is a very fine line between simply expressing yourself in a unique way, and doing it excessively to troll for reactions from people who've already made their dislike perfectly clear.

meh...kiwi has had trolls and she doen't like them either...you try getting alot of hate mail for the way you are then you can talk about trolling. Mind you I can troll with the best of them if you provoke me to but it's not my fault that speaking in third person is a habit kiwi has...it's not like she can't speak in first person it's just she doesn't like it. I could care less how people react to the way kiwi chooses to speak. It's not as if I asked them to get annoyed because they have issues with third person...

[Kekeb]

Originally Posted by XUioX

Devonin says: Quoting bannable text is almost as bad as posting it in the first place.

Oh? but i get a ban dev? unjust

[devonin]

Can we drop the discussion about the validity or lack of validity inherant in speaking in the third person?

The actual point of this thread was resolved a while ago and doesn't need any more posts.

Kekeb, PM me what you're referring to. If I banned you previously for quoting someone's bannable text I highly suspect it is that their post was inherantly bannable on its own (filter evasion etc) There was nothing actually bannable in the text XUioX quoted except that it was flaming someone which is what the ban were for.

If XUioX had filled in the **** swears, or quoted someone who did, they would also have been banned.