TWG CLXVIII: Capitalism [Game Thread]

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Apple

Well, I thought a bit of a change would help. I think unmodified me is a little too easy to copy.

On the other hand, you're now in charge of making sure I'm me

Maybe I was wrong.

I shouldn't be focused on this anyway.

[Verizon]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

You guys are pretty lucky I'm not the whatever its called, I'd wipe the floor with you fools.

Clearly not the *whatever its called* 'cause they don't even know what it actually is amirite?!?!?!?!?

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Verizon

Clearly not the *whatever its called* 'cause they don't even know what it actually is amirite?!?!?!?!?

When I was making that post my head kept saying "Inquisitor" even though I knew it was wrong.

How do you feel about my shitvote on Mickey D's?

[Shell]

Originally Posted by McDonalds

China Mobile is my new favorite person. Also, semi-serious vote on Visa for speculating about how many wolves there are. That's a really easy way to look town, because only the wolves know how many wolves are in the game.

That's totally a good reason.

✧

[Shell]

Joking, it's not, mister!

✧

[Apple]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

When I was making that post my head kept saying "Inquisitor" even though I knew it was wrong.

How do you feel about my shitvote on Mickey D's?

It was a shitvote?

[Shell]

Originally Posted by Apple

I also got a snap person-read from this post. However, I pretty much have to be wrong on it.

If I was right, this post would look very good for Disney. However, it would mean they're not moderating their posting style at all in a post that is about distinct typing styles. Those two facts don't mix for me.

Uh, yeah, gonna have to say you should probably not rely on meta reads here, pal.

It's not a good business practice, you understand?

✧

[Verizon]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

When I was making that post my head kept saying "Inquisitor" even though I knew it was wrong.

How do you feel about my shitvote on Mickey D's?

Not expecting anything really serious for this whole cycle tbh

[Shell]

Originally Posted by Verizon

Not expecting anything really serious for this whole cycle tbh

Even after closing hours?

✧

[Apple]

Originally Posted by Shell

Uh, yeah, gonna have to say you should probably not rely on meta reads here, pal.

It's not a good business practice, you understand?

✧

It's not like I'm going to out who I think they are. Plus, I already addressed the unreliability of the read in the post you quoted.

[Shell]

Originally Posted by Apple

It was a shitvote?

Hey apple, do you want to invest in our fine fuels and oils? I'd give you a special discount.

✧

[Apple]

Originally Posted by Shell

Hey apple, do you want to invest in our fine fuels and oils? I'd give you a special discount.

✧

This seems pockety in context.

I'll allow it.

[Walmart]

Originally Posted by Wells Fargo

Nah, I know for sure now.

The change you've made is noticeable, but even breaking out a dusty thesaurus instead of a brand new one won't change anything.

You guys are pretty lucky I'm not the whatever its called, I'd wipe the floor with you fools.

It appears Wells Fargo can't handle our verbose diction.

Regardless of that fact, I think it is time to enter a more serious phase of discussion. We've had our introductions, so let's get to work.

I agree with Apple on the purpose of IBM's tomfoolery in the style of posting. It is clearly to bust any acquisitioner that would take him over, as imitating the style might cause a headache. I'm sure a dedicated acquisitioner would have no qualms taking them over and adopting the posting style, but this wholly depends on the player controlling them. A careful eye would have also noticed that Shell is doing a similar thing albeit much more simple.

I feel like Wells Fargo's vote on McD's was not a shitvote, another nod towards Apple's mindset (and Shell in addition). The vote's purpose was to half call out McD's call out of Visa for talking about the number of wolves. I think McD is looking extra desperate here trying to find some way to project town. Any seasoned player would know that speculating about the number of wolves is non-alignment indicative. Clearly a fool's mistake.

There are still several CEOs that the whole thread would like to hear from. At this juncture, I am liking Apple the most.

Shame on Verizon for not wanting serious discussion for this cycle. As they say, idle hands are the devil's workshop.

Thank you,

Sam Walton

[Xiz]

Currently aware that apparently you cannot post links. I'm trying to get this resolved.

Fixed

[Wells Fargo]

Originally Posted by Walmart

A careful eye would have also noticed that Shell is doing a similar thing albeit much more simple.

Come on, don't point that out. Make the acquisitioner see it.

[Wells Fargo]

I don't know what to tell you, it was a shitvote.

Look at the reasoning behind it. It was fun to type, and that's really it.

If you don't like McDonalds for that post, that's cool, but that's not really what I was doing with that vote.

[Shell]

Originally Posted by Apple

This seems pockety in context.

I'll allow it.

Nice, you won't regret it!

✧

[Walmart]

Originally Posted by Xiz

Role PM's:

Town x10: You are vanilla town, your vote is your power. You win when all threats are removed from town.

Cop x1: You are a cop. During the night, you can check the alignment of a player of your choice. It will come back as Anti-Town or Town. You win when all threats are removed from town.
Nerfed Doctor x1: During the night, you can choose a CEO of your choice to save. Your target will be immune to any attacks. You may not choose the same target twice in a row. You win when all threats are removed from town.
Vigilante x1: During the night, you can choose a CEO of your choice to be killed. You win when all threats are removed from town.
Blocker x1: During the night, you can choose a CEO of your choice to be blocked. You win when all threats are removed from town.
Deal Breaker x1: During the night, you can choose a CEO of your choice to prevent an Acquisition. This has no effect on anyone else in the game besides the Acquisitioner. You win when all threats are removed from town.

Vanilla Wolf x1: You are a vanilla wolf. You win when you receive majority over town. Be wary! There is a chance that your alliance might be compromised. Discuss other companies in your private chat carefully.
Bulletproof Vanilla Wolf x1: You are a vanilla wolf with a 1shot vest. You win when you receive majority over town. Be wary! There is a chance that your alliance might be compromised. Discuss other companies in your private chat carefully.
Godfather x1: You are the godfather. You are immune to cop checks. Be wary! There is a chance that your alliance might be compromised. Discuss other companies in your private chat carefully.
Roleblocker x1: You are the roleblocker. During the night, you can choose a CEO to prevent them from making an action from being executed on their target. Be wary! There is a chance that your alliance might be compromised. Discuss other companies in your private chat carefully.

Acquisitioner x1: You are the 3rd party Acquisitioner. During the night, you choose a company to take over, becoming their new CEO. This can be done to any player in the game, including wolves. Your previous company gets flipped in return. You win when you are the last one standing or achieve majority. You have the option of not using your power. Also, Pregrame you can choose between Seer Immune or 1shot bulletproof vest.

Also, for anyone who wants to "speculate" about the number of wolves, it is exactly four.

Read the OP.

Regardless of the number, we should always be aiming to lynch one of them or the acquisitioner.

Thank you,

Sam Walton

[Shell]

Originally Posted by Walmart

I think McD is looking extra desperate here trying to find some way to project town. Any seasoned player would know that speculating about the number of wolves is non-alignment indicative. Clearly a fool's mistake.

Don't know about desperate Walmastro, but I definitely sensed something amiss.

Think it was the "semi-serious" remark that really irked me.

✧

[Wells Fargo]

shitpost