09-8-2009, 02:55 PM | #21 | |
ITG playing fur
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,660
|
Re: How the tournament should have gone.
Quote:
I know if I was in a tournament run like this, I wouldnt be very motivated, because I knew that if I got an amazing score, I would be moved up to a different division where my score would have been sub-par, therefore ruining any excitement, and also, I doubt someone would be good enough to shift more than 2 division in a 1-10 scale anyway. Its not like some original D2 is going to magically bounce to D6 or 7 anyway, so this is pretty inefficient in my opinion. There are some people who may like this, but you are also going to get more "this is bs" because 2nd place in D1-9 is going to say 1st should have been in the next division up bolded because I like this statement.
__________________
|
|
09-8-2009, 03:01 PM | #22 |
Very Grave Indeed
|
Re: How the tournament should have gone.
Also, what you're saying is "Instead of trying to actually rank people based on their stats and scores in advance of the tourney starting, I'm going to try to sort them all, as I go, on the fly" Have fun doing that with 1000-1200 participants.
|
09-8-2009, 03:03 PM | #23 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 201
|
Re: How the tournament should have gone.
Quote:
The top two players would be of similar skill level, so it wouldn't be "BS" if the winner got a few less goods. If they were fit for the next division up they would be there. And moving many divisions is very possible, I was borderline D2/D3 IMO at the beginning of this tournament, and I'm now borderline D4. Which would be 3-4 divisions up in this tournament. |
|
09-8-2009, 03:06 PM | #24 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 201
|
Re: How the tournament should have gone.
Quote:
It would definitely be hard, but not impossible. There are plenty of active players to pull it off. |
|
09-8-2009, 03:18 PM | #25 |
Very Grave Indeed
|
Re: How the tournament should have gone.
And then all the people disagreing over who needs to be moved or not, having personal biases about the players interfere with their objectivity etc etc.
|
09-8-2009, 03:22 PM | #26 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 201
|
Re: How the tournament should have gone.
Quote:
You wouldn't get moved for being a tad better than the rest. |
|
09-8-2009, 03:26 PM | #27 |
Very Grave Indeed
|
Re: How the tournament should have gone.
Even a phrase like "obviously better" is severely open to interpretation.
|
09-8-2009, 03:31 PM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,305
|
Re: How the tournament should have gone.
Would take too much work.
No one is dedicated that much to FFR. |
09-8-2009, 04:37 PM | #29 |
¯\(°_o)/¯ ¯\(o_°)/¯
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Camarillo, California
Age: 33
Posts: 5,576
|
Re: How the tournament should have gone.
You can say you are but once you start doing it you'll have your doubts.
|
09-8-2009, 04:42 PM | #30 |
Retired Staff
All the things
|
Re: How the tournament should have gone.
There is no true way to eliminate cheaters and sandbaggers. Its gonna happen no matter what you do. The only thing that can be done is DQing people if it is believed they are cheating. But then if they're not cheating it sucks for them. It just amazes me that people want to cheat. A tourney for me is a way to show myself how well I'm doing and earning my place not the prizes.
|
09-8-2009, 04:49 PM | #31 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 201
|
Re: How the tournament should have gone.
|
09-8-2009, 05:31 PM | #32 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,305
|
Re: How the tournament should have gone.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|