|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-11-2016, 04:21 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fb.com/a.macdonald.iv
Age: 35
Posts: 6,344
|
a video response to common donald trump qualification criticisms posed by terence tao
Last edited by Arch0wl; 11-11-2016 at 04:21 PM.. |
11-11-2016, 04:55 PM | #2 |
FFR Player
|
Re: a video response to common donald trump qualification criticisms posed by terence
tfw arch is relevant again
__________________
,, ,_, -ー'"{ ゛ヌ ノノノノハヾ ノ li.゚ ヮ゚ノi 彡と} 猫.{つ |
11-11-2016, 07:05 PM | #3 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 33
Posts: 146
|
Re: a video response to common donald trump qualification criticisms posed by terence
"This is like saying he's negative 80 vs negative 70 on this point [couldn't catch last word]."
I think that, what you refer to in your own words "willingness to compromise" on climate change science (which requires acknowledging its existence), next to 1) outright denying the existence of such; 2) attempting to abolish the EPA completely; 3) moving away from a clean and/or renewable energy energy infrastructure and instead regressing to fossil fuels and natural gas; and 4) making a post-election promise to withdraw from global climate change deals, is a much, much more dramatic difference between negative 70 and negative 80, in terms of proportionality. I mean there are a huge host of things that bug me about his platform; most of them aren't really specific to him, so much as unobstructed republican legislative power. But this one, should be a huge fucking deal to anyone. Yes, there is absolutely a difference between attempting to gradually transition to a different energy paradigm, than actively trying to revert the US to the environmental policies of the 1950s, and it isn't the difference that you're suggesting. Last edited by IamMe90; 11-11-2016 at 07:06 PM.. |
11-11-2016, 07:10 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fb.com/a.macdonald.iv
Age: 35
Posts: 6,344
|
Re: a video response to common donald trump qualification criticisms posed by terence
1 was bush and going to happen with any republican, that's party platform shit
2 is not happening the opposite of 3 didn't even happen with obama so I can't even say it's happening with a republican 4 was going to happen with any republican, that's party platform shit 4th parties (nonprofit interests and so on) are going to force someone's hand with climate change and no one at the highest levels of politics -- no one -- can be trusted to make decisions with anything resembling scientific literacy on the issue Last edited by Arch0wl; 11-11-2016 at 07:11 PM.. |
11-11-2016, 08:19 PM | #5 | ||||
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 33
Posts: 146
|
Re: a video response to common donald trump qualification criticisms posed by terence
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|