05-2-2019, 03:11 PM | #161 |
Picker @ JAX2
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 505
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
dammit
wayward |
05-2-2019, 03:12 PM | #162 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 474
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
Quote:
What I am getting from the long post to daiyki seems to boil down to "I am great at reading Haku and he is obviously a townsperson, therefore you posting anything is padding in comparison to Haku's posting." Is that accurate? |
|
05-2-2019, 03:13 PM | #163 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 10
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
i think shadowolfe you need to reread intent of my post, and the fact that im not really pushing the thought any further. i even characterized the thought initially as just that, a thought that doesnt really lead to many data points in my mind. i even allude to the fact that i havent played with haku for a long time, so unless youre not actually reading the things you directly quoted, im actually unsure why you seem to be angry at me for pointing out something about haku? it seems like a really sudden and out of place gut defend
__ re: mml not acknowledging haku posts as padding my definition of padding is closer to straight up unnecessary, and irrelevant things posted as a guise to try and look active and involved. hakus posts were regarding a previous game. my posts were straight up about posts that were being made in this game lol so unless this is something different than straight up semantics about what your view of "padding" is, its another instance of arguing for the sake of arguing which im trying to step away from, because of the general unlikableness (in a real life way, unrelated to gamestate) of the situations it generates. also, you can call my posts easy mode all you want, but im still earnestly trying to make observations and actually think on them, rather than slapping in surface level reads. if you want a base level read, consider something more than "trying to analyze haku d0 is easy mode"
__________________
|
05-2-2019, 03:14 PM | #164 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 474
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
|
05-2-2019, 03:17 PM | #165 | ||
Picker @ JAX2
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 505
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-2-2019, 03:17 PM | #166 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: On a mountain in a desert
Posts: 564
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
Yes that's the one I'm referring to
__________________
aka mikey ----- |
05-2-2019, 03:20 PM | #167 | ||
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 474
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-2-2019, 03:20 PM | #168 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 10
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
Quote:
gradiant is the kind of person who reacts badly to people being dumb above all else tbh, i dont think its ever any town/wolf indicator
__________________
|
|
05-2-2019, 03:21 PM | #169 |
Picker @ JAX2
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 505
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
|
05-2-2019, 03:23 PM | #170 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: On a mountain in a desert
Posts: 564
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
As opposed to a reads list with a pool of 5 or 6 potential wolves
Imma cry shade here
__________________
aka mikey ----- |
05-2-2019, 03:23 PM | #171 | |
Picker @ JAX2
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 505
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
Quote:
maybe he thinks shado was being too bristly but i read his posts like he was acking shado had a point there |
|
05-2-2019, 03:25 PM | #172 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 474
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
|
05-2-2019, 03:26 PM | #173 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 474
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
DO YOU NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO SHARE BESIDES A NULL LEAN?
|
05-2-2019, 03:26 PM | #174 | |
Picker @ JAX2
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 505
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
Quote:
still don't get it really anyway, it's not the end of the setup spec that's actually indicative because that's standard ratio still, plus you were in a team of 3 in the first roll, so it's whatever |
|
05-2-2019, 03:27 PM | #175 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 474
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
ARE YOU SUSPICIOUS OF EITHER OF THE PEOPLE TRYING TO TAKE ME OFF THE TABLE LESS THAN HALFWAY THROUGH THE DAY
|
05-2-2019, 03:29 PM | #176 | |
FFR's Resident Trashpanda
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 1,095
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
Quote:
2) In earlier games yeah maybe, but only after a bit into the game after people are continuously doing stupid stuff or refusing to be involved in the game (inactivity or plain just throwing stuff around without reading). I do agree with daikyi though about shado's sudden, intervention i guess? it's why i said in my post that his reaction was insightful. |
|
05-2-2019, 03:33 PM | #177 |
FFR's Resident Trashpanda
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 1,095
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
|
05-2-2019, 03:35 PM | #178 |
FFR's Resident Trashpanda
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Michigan
Age: 29
Posts: 1,095
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
daikyi, when you say 'defend' when talking about shado and haku, are you inferring a general defense just because or that they'd be on the same team if one of them were scum?
|
05-2-2019, 03:36 PM | #179 |
Picker @ JAX2
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 505
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
ok, maybe i misunderstood then
@mml i'm still left wondering what there would be to escalate though since gradi's point seemed to be made; either you expected him to push on that more forcefully or...? |
05-2-2019, 03:37 PM | #180 |
Picker @ JAX2
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 505
|
Re: TWG CLXXXV: C9+++++++++ Game Thread
"escalate" was my word but the sentiment's there, not like there's nothing happening between gradiant and shado
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|