TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

[mellonxcollie]

Re: TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

See my explanation and the posts I quoted.

why are you ignoring answering why you think Backpack is town? Quoting posts is not an explanation. We've all already read those posts in the thread and it does not add any original thoughts or content to the game by quoting them as a response

[MixMasterLar]

Re: TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

Ok I'm dipping for awhile I'll catch you cats in a few hours

[Witch of Certainty]

Re: TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

It's concerning if that's all you have to offer




I did?

"all I have to offer"? Tell me what you think it's missing, then.

I overlooked something already? :/

I don't think that's what happened


He started to put pressure on Raeko when I was doing it and it looked like Raeko wasn't around to defend. From that point on he was pressured by both Raeko and AA who wouldn't let up. In that situation, do you think a wolf would have ignored them and not responded?

This makes no sense. Not saying 100% a wolf but his interactions in and of themselves don't point to a town Shado.

Having checked back, Shado was the one who provoked Raeko into the fight, which is not something I think a wolf does, why create that situation in the first place?

[Witch of Certainty]

Re: TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

why are you ignoring answering why you think Backpack is town? Quoting posts is not an explanation. We've all already read those posts in the thread and it does not add any original thoughts or content to the game by quoting them as a response

I'm not? I said in my list of thoughts why, he had content I liked and I liked his answer to my question early on. Those posts were quoted in response to being asked about which content I had in mind.

[ShadoWolfe]

Re: TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

@shadow yes

Thanks.

What are you doing now? After we've all shared why we think you're town, please don't tell me you're going to rest on your laurels?

Any thoughts on the people in thread atm? Witch/Raeko for instance?
Or people who aren't? AA? Sunfan?

[mellonxcollie]

Re: TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

I'm not? I said in my list of thoughts why, he had content I liked and I liked his answer to my question early on. Those posts were quoted in response to being asked about which content I had in mind.

Alright. I guess it's just not a very satisfactory explanation. It seems that you keep referencing posts you've already made, rather than expanding your thoughts when asked about them. This is suspicious to me

[Witch of Certainty]

Re: TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

Alright. I guess it's just not a very satisfactory explanation. It seems that you keep referencing posts you've already made, rather than expanding your thoughts when asked about them. This is suspicious to me

Not posts I made.

I posted this:

I like Backpack's content, as well as his responding to my question eariler by trying to bring up something specific to discuss (as I understood), so he gets a solid town lean.

MMR asked me what content of Backpack I liked, so I quoted those posts.

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

She is a sun fan, in a way.

I can't believe I missed this, A+

[ShadoWolfe]

Re: TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

Not posts I made.

I posted this:

MMR asked me what content of Backpack I liked, so I quoted those posts.

I love you. <3

[thesunfan]

Re: TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

Alright. I guess it's just not a very satisfactory explanation. It seems that you keep referencing posts you've already made, rather than expanding your thoughts when asked about them. This is suspicious to me

why is this suspicious to you?

[Hakulyte]

Re: TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

She's looking for an explanation from a new angle rather than redirecting~

[ShadoWolfe]

Re: TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

why are you ignoring answering why you think Backpack is town? Quoting posts is not an explanation. We've all already read those posts in the thread and it does not add any original thoughts or content to the game by quoting them as a response

Alright. I guess it's just not a very satisfactory explanation. It seems that you keep referencing posts you've already made, rather than expanding your thoughts when asked about them. This is suspicious to me

This is suspicious to me.

[Witch of Certainty]

Re: TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

And what do you mean by expanding my thoughts? I don't see what's wrong with referencing posts I or others have already made to explain/support what I said after.

[DaBackpack]

Re: TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

Thanks.

What are you doing now? After we've all shared why we think you're town, please don't tell me you're going to rest on your laurels?

Any thoughts on the people in thread atm? Witch/Raeko for instance?
Or people who aren't? AA? Sunfan?

nah, I just multitasking

for the time being, I tentatively like Raeko based her earlier frustration, but I haven't noticed a whole lot of substantial offensive pressure/investigation yet

despite it not being fleshed out, I kind of like Witch's earlier reads list, but again I haven't seen any investigation from her, just responses and commentary

also, she has no wolf leans yet, but depending on how that develops my opinion on her will crystallize more (for the moment, she's just null)

[Hakulyte]

Re: TWG CLXIV: Classics Man - Game Thread

And what do you mean by expanding my thoughts? I don't see what's wrong with referencing posts I or others have already made to explain/support what I said after.

Providing a new perspective give more content to compare and decide if that makes you more town than wolf etc.

It's more a matter of data than right vs wrong to see if you're coherent with yourself.