![]() |
#121 | ||
FFR Player
|
![]()
Are you still that immature to believe finding a compatible mate requires no physical attraction whatsoever
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
http://imgur.com/a/Ww9g3 |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#122 | |||
FFR Player
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
http://imgur.com/a/Ww9g3 |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#123 |
Batch Manager
Game Manager, Song Release Coordinator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Age: 29
Posts: 14,871
|
![]() In other words: Any post that has a couple paragraphs and isn't in CT is automatically considered a tl;dr dumb post.
![]() Also if you're not going to even listen to why he did it in the first place, then he has no reason to be offended by you lol. You're just going to keep saying "hyuk hyuk you're a loser". Oh and I bet you're also going to reply to this saying something similar. Maybe even trying to find archives about me too! xd |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#124 | |
Custom User Title
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,105
|
![]() Sup guys I hear there's drama
__________________
Quote:
Taking "all" oddjobs! PM me requests. Requests filled: 2 last active Mar. 6th, 2017 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#125 | |
Custom User Title
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,105
|
![]() I felt like throwing a double post in here cause I'm cool like that okay bye
__________________
Quote:
Taking "all" oddjobs! PM me requests. Requests filled: 2 last active Mar. 6th, 2017 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#126 |
Batch Manager
Game Manager, Song Release Coordinator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Age: 29
Posts: 14,871
|
![]() Dramamanias
SUBJECTIVEMANIAS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#127 |
FFR Player
![]() Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: New York City, New York
Posts: 8,340
|
![]() I see nothing wrong with being shallow.
If someone likes people primarily for their physical looks/money, what's the issue? It's only a problem if the person with looks/money wants to be valued for more than that. But more generally, for me, someone could be really smart and nice, but it just isn't going to work if there's no physical/sexual chemistry. I've been with smart girls that were cute, smart girls that were unattractive, unintelligent girls that were hot, and unintelligent girls that were unattractive (but were nice people). I've met girls online, and I've met girls in person. I've been with serious types and the immature types. I've always gotten along better with smarter girls with a physical cuteness and sexual wild side -- with the ability to be either really serious or really funloving. Dumb girls eventually infuriate me and make me embarrassed to be around them. Unattractive girls make it hard for me to look forward to any sort of physical activity because it's simply not as exciting. Girls that are too serious bore me after a while, and girls who don't know *how* to be serious make communication difficult (and it usually makes me call their maturity into question). When there's a rift in communication, the girl and I usually wind up hating each other. Luckily, my current girlfriend fits almost every one of my nitpicky metrics, and vice-versa. It pays not to settle. But it also pays to be realistic.
__________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0es0Mip1jWY |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#128 |
FFR Veteran
![]() |
![]() We're all trolls.
![]()
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#129 | |||
FFR Player
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
http://imgur.com/a/Ww9g3 |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#130 |
FFR Player
|
![]()
excuse me? is there a good reason to spend your time creating a female internet persona and upkeep its reputation?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#131 |
Praise the sun mofo
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lordran
Age: 32
Posts: 4,281
|
![]() i like the multitude of colors in the users viewing this thread, bet red is gonna lock it though
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#132 | |
Batch Manager
Game Manager, Song Release Coordinator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Age: 29
Posts: 14,871
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Going back to Rubix: Some people get lured in by money, like you mentioned - this may be a problem because it's not actual love, it's just trying to get to that person so you can live a wealthy lifestyle. The most important thing is definitely to be realistic though. The first thing you need to understand is that you may find a female that fits most of your expectations, but still isn't quite perfect. You should stick with someone you really do care about, even if they may not be the most attractive, etc. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#133 | |
Snek
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas
Age: 34
Posts: 9,192
|
![]() Quote:
I can't see what you are questioning how mature or not I am. If anything it is being naive. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#134 |
FFR Player
|
![]() Man you're dumb Dossar.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#135 |
FFR Veteran
![]() |
![]() thread isn't closed, but the trolls are banned at this point in time.
Back on topic, I forgot to add that I can't do with a female who has had sex with more than 5 men.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#136 |
Very Grave Indeed
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Is that number going to increase as you get older? Or is 5 partners ever in their whole life just somehow magically too many for you to cope with forever?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#137 |
Snek
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas
Age: 34
Posts: 9,192
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#138 |
FFR Veteran
![]() |
![]()
Eh, since I believe in saving yourself for love (not marriage) no it wont. It's just not my thing. It's not a double standard for me either, if a guy brags about how many people he has screwed I'd just be like, "cool."
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#139 |
Senior Member
![]() |
![]()
There's that perspective I've been looking for.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#140 |
FFR Player
![]() Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: New York City, New York
Posts: 8,340
|
![]() In one of my finance classes, we briefly, for fun, applied a probability model to relationship standards for the hell of it.
If we had the opportunity to roll multiple dice in a row (with the ability to stop any time), where our payout equaled what we rolled, we'd obviously keep rolling until we hit a 6. We wouldn't roll once and stick with a 2. We have the luxury of re-rolling if our number of trials is sufficiently high. But how do we know when to stop rolling? When it comes to this dice game, the math is easy. For one die, we stop if we beat 3.5 (i.e. roll a 4, 5, or 6). For two dice, we stop if we beat 4.25 (i.e. roll a 5 or 6) on the first roll, or if we choose to keep going, we expect a 3.5 if we roll again. Once we hit the sweet spot of 5 dice do we aim for the max. We stop on the first roll if we beat 5.13 or so (only achievable by rolling a 6). Any additional dice we get beyond that mark essentially gains us free shots at aiming for 6. In other words, if we take this logic to relationships -- the reason we don't want to settle is obviously because our standards are higher when we're young. We have more time ahead of us and we can continually go on dates to our heart's content, rejecting whatever doesn't surpass our U(x) thresholds. The problem, of course, is that women aren't dice. We don't immediately know all the values up front, nor do we know the probability distributions like we do with a die. It's also much harder to roll again. Furthermore, dating is two-sided. We may find someone that is good enough for us, but are we good enough for them? It can start to look pretty bleak when you factor all this crap in. It all points to a bit of a numbers game. If you have high standards, date frequently and often -- and be willing to accept brutal rejections in high dosages. If you have lower standards, you obviously don't need to do this as much. Just a fun way to model the situation. XD
__________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0es0Mip1jWY |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|