09-1-2005, 11:40 AM | #81 |
Cerebellumberjack
|
RE: Re: RE: Plea for resurrection.
I'm against rezzing nick. I really don't think the info he has could be all that useful, unless the wolves are really dumb. But in that case, we wouldn't need the info anyway.
On another note, I currently haven't been contacted by the Gaurdian or the Psychic. Lemme say to them that it is imperitive for atleast the psychic to contact me. The gaurdian can stick to his best judgement on who to gaurd, but the alliance will always need to know how many wolves are left. |
09-1-2005, 01:21 PM | #82 | |
FFR Player
|
Re: RE: Re: RE: Plea for resurrection.
Quote:
I really doubt that you are the seer. I would've been more sure of the fact if the wolves tried to go after you during the night. I have to vote for mead
__________________
|
|
09-1-2005, 03:22 PM | #83 |
FFR Player
|
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Plea for resurrection.
I honestly doubt mead is a wolf. As someone else said, we should wait for the ressurection.
__________________
|
09-1-2005, 03:52 PM | #84 | |
FFR Player
|
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Plea for resurrection.
the fact that mead hasn't been contacted implies to me that the guardian and the psychic don't trust him...which makes me trust him just a little less.
i still don't know entirely though. i think the ressurection would be better spent on a possible blue, and don't have any ideas as to who the blues are (well, except mead). the way this is set up it seems like ressurection isn't worth it. if anything, it's a one day extension to buy time. i don't think we need to buy time yet.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
09-1-2005, 04:12 PM | #85 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 30
|
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Plea for resurrection.
I'm going to ask to ressurect nickadeemus because if Kilga wouldn't allow him to say it in his death post, it must be important.
I'll hold my vote until later, until I have more evidence.
__________________
Spicboy lol signature |
09-1-2005, 04:47 PM | #86 |
lil j the bad b-word
|
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Plea for resurrection.
I'm not going to waste the ressurection on Day 2. Why waste it on a normal human when you could ressurect a blue such as the guardian or seer?
__________________
|
09-1-2005, 04:50 PM | #87 | ||
Cerebellumberjack
|
Re: RE: Re: RE: Plea for resurrection.
Quote:
Guys, if you want to vote me, go ahead, but atleast make a half-hearted attempt at logical reasoning before doing so. Also, @Freed: How does me being contacted by the blues affect whether or not I am the seer? They know the exact same things you do. Their judgement is as good/bad as anyone elses. If anything, I would think you would trust me slightly more because I was honest about it and didn't try to decieve you all. |
||
09-1-2005, 05:22 PM | #88 |
FFR Player
|
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Plea for resurrection.
Sorry guys, I thought we could resurrect as many times in one game as we wanted to. That was a misunderstanding on my part.
__________________
|
09-1-2005, 06:29 PM | #89 | |||
FFR Player
|
Re: RE: Re: RE: Plea for resurrection.
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
09-1-2005, 06:42 PM | #90 |
lil j the bad b-word
|
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Plea for resurrection.
Tasuke, there's a reason that he's not going to tell you who he seered. If the others in contact with him were blues, he would not want to put that out in the open where wolves could read it. Don't be stupid.
__________________
|
09-1-2005, 06:50 PM | #91 |
Cerebellumberjack
|
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Plea for resurrection.
It appears I misunderstood you, but this interpretation of what you said is even more retarded than the first. Firstly, why on earth would I reveal the alliance to the rest of the world? That would get them wolved. The point of having an alliance is so that you have a small but growing circle of people that you know you can trust, that you can vote en mass for a wolf when one is seered. Next, yeah, the alliance is 3 people, the same number of wolves there are. This being because I can only seer one person a night. If it was any more or any less, it would prove I was hiding something. But it is three, because I seered one human night 1, one night 2. I can't believe I even have to explain that to you. Next, how on earth would it have made me more suspicious if the wolves had a go at me? I am nowhere near cocky enough to try that. They tried that in TWG one time, and failed miserably. I am no maniac entrepreneur of TWG stratedgies, I am just doing what has worked (Consistently) in the past: Trying to form an alliance of humans revolving around the seer so that we can cross people off the list one by one.
You really just need to stop man, you are making yourself look really dumb, and pretty suspicious. |
09-1-2005, 08:08 PM | #92 | |
GotR Creator
|
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Plea for resurrection.
Quote:
Who's there? Underline when you resurrect! Underline when you resurrect who? Underline when you try and resurrect someone, and don't forget you can't vote someone to die, and someone to be resurrected; you have to choose one! |
|
09-1-2005, 09:19 PM | #93 |
FFR Player
|
Alright, I'm taking back my resurrection vote, and I'm going to put a safety vote on B3NJ1 until I can talk to more people.
__________________
|
09-2-2005, 03:10 AM | #94 |
FFR Player
|
same, i'll put my safety vote on myself, scream at me if i'm not allowed to do that
mattc16 |
09-2-2005, 05:01 AM | #95 |
FFR Player
|
I don't think there's anything wrong with that. During this game and the last game I played in, Demon voted for himself several times.
__________________
|
09-2-2005, 08:36 AM | #96 |
Away from Computer
|
Ok I'm putting a safety vote on
JimmyLobos wait... actually I'm going to make that a not safety vote. After reviewing the list of remaining people, I don't think there's 3 wolves among the active players (based on what I've gathered), meaning that, I'm changing my safety vote to a not-for-safety vote for JimmyLobos
__________________
|
09-2-2005, 09:04 AM | #97 |
Cerebellumberjack
|
Well, now a situation asks me, stupid human, or wolf? I am referring of course to Tasuke. Call it angry retort if you want, because that's kind of what it is. I don't however have any better leads at the moment, so for now atleast, he is on the top of my list.
My reasoning is this: I just don't think he is that dumb. The way he posts suggests that he is a rather smart guy, but his reasoning is non-existant. I mean, he asked me to reveal the names of the alliance, for crying out loud. It's not much of a lead, but it is all I've got. Also, do not ressurect Nick. The ressurection power is invaluable, and it would be rediculously dumb to use it on someone who not only wasn't a blue, but doesn't know anything worth rezzing him for. Save it for when we lose someone who is contributing, or someone who is blue. |
09-2-2005, 09:39 AM | #98 |
FFR Player
|
This is the closest I have to something as of now. JimmyLobos. He has been fairly inactive, or he could just be busy but until I have more evidence elsewhere, my vote stands.
__________________
|
09-2-2005, 03:10 PM | #99 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 30
|
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Plea for resurrection.
mead seems suspicious to me, since the whole day he was trying so hard to convince us that he's the seer. Besides, Tasuke is right. If you WERE the seer the wolves should've been smart enough to wolf you. Also, the chat log Jurs put up seemed convincing, since it had believable time stamps.
__________________
Spicboy lol signature |
09-2-2005, 03:21 PM | #100 |
Cerebellumberjack
|
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Plea for resurrection.
No wolf would be dumb enough to wolf me last night because the gaurd was obviously on me. Why would they waste the kill?
Also, why exactley is the word of Jurs' mystery seer more believable than mine? Anyone can IM anybody else and say "no i am seer". |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|