08-14-2008, 08:27 PM | #9401 |
smoke wheat hail satin
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LA baby
Age: 36
Posts: 5,704
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
It'll get rejected if it's only C/VC. (Though, I'd actually like non FMOs to have hands..)
Then again, you're hi19. So, who knows. |
08-14-2008, 08:49 PM | #9402 | |
TWO THOUZAND COMBO
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
OK we all have each others' notes now.
4 files got +/+/+, behanjc gets awesome file award for having 2 of them. the other 2 were judge files (JX's file and one of mine). in a rare bit of indignance, i kind of felt like brandish deserved it too after reading jx's notes and disagreeing with half of them but oh well ;_;
__________________
4th Official FFR Tournament - Master division champion! Quote:
Last edited by Shashakiro; 08-14-2008 at 08:54 PM.. |
|
08-14-2008, 08:52 PM | #9403 |
Sic itur ad astra
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
;_;
grats behan!
__________________
RIP Steve Van Ness <3 |
08-14-2008, 08:58 PM | #9404 |
Retired BOSS
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
tass notes:
brandish - [-] SSH sucks.
__________________
RIP |
08-14-2008, 09:03 PM | #9405 | |
Call me Massive Swallow
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
Ska better have been a +/+/+
__________________
Quote:
|
|
08-14-2008, 09:05 PM | #9406 | |
TWO THOUZAND COMBO
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
stargroup, hi19, i think it's time for me to join the conspiracy
__________________
4th Official FFR Tournament - Master division champion! Quote:
|
|
08-14-2008, 09:07 PM | #9407 |
cohoooooon
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
fuccen saitama saishuu heiki rofl
HEY TASS METS WON 9-3 NOW YOURE PHILLIES GET WRECKED BYE |
08-14-2008, 09:08 PM | #9408 |
Sic itur ad astra
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
agreed. lol
__________________
RIP Steve Van Ness <3 |
08-14-2008, 09:09 PM | #9409 | |
lol happy
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DESTINY
Age: 33
Posts: 12,193
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
Quote:
protip: you don't mess with Shash's SSH
__________________
|
|
08-14-2008, 09:25 PM | #9410 |
Retired BOSS
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
SSH AND Maiden.
__________________
RIP |
08-14-2008, 09:26 PM | #9411 |
FFR Player
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
I've been hating tass since before it was cool :-/
__________________
<%SSH|Korysar> does anyone else watch pornos for the soundtrack <Mehified> No offense to you tho xd <@Alive> i misunderstood the meaning of shiney instruments and he tole me to calm down <+lurker> if i want porno music <+lurker> i'll listen to the sonic 3 ost <%SSH|Korysar> LMFAO <sjoecool1991> ahaha |
08-14-2008, 09:31 PM | #9412 | |
TWO THOUZAND COMBO
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
__________________
4th Official FFR Tournament - Master division champion! Quote:
|
|
08-14-2008, 09:32 PM | #9413 |
Retired BOSS
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
oh noes. the claws are out now.
__________________
RIP |
08-14-2008, 10:10 PM | #9414 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
I wonder if my files have been judged yet...
|
08-14-2008, 10:13 PM | #9415 | |
TWO THOUZAND COMBO
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
__________________
4th Official FFR Tournament - Master division champion! Quote:
|
|
08-14-2008, 10:14 PM | #9416 |
lol happy
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DESTINY
Age: 33
Posts: 12,193
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
ouch
__________________
|
08-14-2008, 10:20 PM | #9417 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
...what does that mean?... and isn't Tass the one who's judging?
Last edited by CosmicRain; 08-14-2008 at 10:24 PM.. |
08-14-2008, 10:28 PM | #9418 | |
Call me Massive Swallow
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
3 judges, 2 files, 6 [-]'s.
Do the math. In case you're lazy: Your files sucked ass.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
08-14-2008, 10:30 PM | #9419 | |
TWO THOUZAND COMBO
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
Haha, there are three judges.
These are the file ratings used right now, I wrote this up for maybe a sticky sometime: [++] Reserved for real masterpieces or flawless files. Rare, rare rating. Same as [+] for the purposes of acceptance, although a file that gets this rating from any judge will almost certainly be accepted by all judges. [+] File is accepted by the judge, maybe with minor suggestions. If 2/3 judges give this rating, the file will be played by Tass. [#] The judge made the file. Identical to + for acceptance. [+.] File is either weakly accepted due to being somewhat generic/uninteresting or is good enough for FFR but could use significant improvement. 2/3 files need this rating to get played by Tass, but he will be much more critical of them. [+?] The file is decent overall but needs some important tweaks in certain areas, or has many small technical errors. Not accepted without changes. [?] The file has potential, but needs significant reworking in order to be good enough for FFR. Not close to acceptance. [-] The lowest rating that you will likely achieve. The file is basically pretty bad and needs to be completely redone, or the file was rejected for the following: -A freeze arrow or mine was used anywhere in the file -A significantly incorrect BPM was used -A section of it was way, way, way too hard, like a wall of 64th quads or something similarly ridiculous If any of the above are noticed, the judge has the right to immediately quit out and give the file a [-] rating, regardless of the quality of the rest of the file. [<] The file was worth at least a [+.] rating, but there is already a better file for this song in the queue or in the batch, and the file is not suitable as a V2. [!] The judge did not play the file for some reason, such as blatantly obvious permission issues (like anyone submitting a Led Zepplin file, for example), technical problems, or multiple difficulties in the file. [--] kill yourself
__________________
4th Official FFR Tournament - Master division champion! Quote:
|
|
08-14-2008, 10:43 PM | #9420 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 127
|
Re: Queue/Batch Discussion Thread
Quote:
For Shashakiro: Thanks for the info! |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|