|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
urararararararara
|
Quote:
First because I mistrust any speech that consists of saying "It was better before" because of how caricatural it is to my mind (you're mainly carrying favor to something you come from/something you know ahead something you aren't coming from and whose you're prone to focus more on what's negative/different instead of what's obejctively positive. Naturally that means you're also prone to focus more on what was positive instead of what was objectively bad about "older music"). Also, not using "real instruments" may not be so much of a negative point on the aesthetical ground. What makes music good isn't simply "using true instruments", there is a huge part lying in the sole fact of composing harmonies and melodies and all that mess y'know, it's something related to the "idea" and not mere acoustic sensations. This is what differentiates a moving piece played by terrible midi soundwaves from a bad tune played by real instruments. Second because I have troubles associating what you said with what happens in our community (and that's the important part!!). I don't even think that's the problem at all. People are stepping a wide variety of genres from a wide variety of eras and that hasn't changed a bit since... 2007 ??? We haven't stopped improving since the beginning. I have a hard time figuring how "music these days" and the fact "New song packs are slowly dying/barely being updated/take a while to make" are relevant or even related. I don't think the problem is about whether or not things were better before but about what you ignore and what you actually know of the thing you're talking about (current community and today's music).
__________________
Suimega is my present username!!! (b-but feel free to call me scylaax anyway) | https://suimega.bandcamp.com/ Last edited by ScylaX; 08-14-2013 at 07:34 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Dec 2008
Age: 35
Posts: 6,205
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Confirmed Heartbreaker
Join Date: Jul 2012
Age: 37
Posts: 5,866
|
What music is being made nowadays has nothing to do with how packs are being made and how long they take lol what are you talking about.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fb.com/a.macdonald.iv
Age: 37
Posts: 6,344
|
there is a huge promotion aspect involved with packs that everyone neglects to talk about explicitly
I've released packs that pretty much no one plays because I've promoted them zilch note: videos count as a form of promotion, as do posting scores |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 378
|
Nevermind... I tend to over think things a bit... If you can comprehend what I was thinking... you might understand what I meant... Maybe... IDK...
edit: Not gonna even attempt to explain either... It's a waste of time. ~ SpoOkyMagician |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
FFR Originalbro
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Age: 35
Posts: 8,751
|
Everybody thinks music/movies/tv shows/anything from the past is better and higher quality than present time media. It's what you grew up with. What era media do all of our parents like the most? 1980s.
The reason packs are slow moving is because there are so many of them. I bet I can look in Simulator Files and find 6 - 8 packs going on Suggestion: Do moderation over packs similar to how the tournaments are moderated and approved/rejected in the FFR Tournaments subforum. And also only allow 2 - 3 packs per 3 months to be open |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Snek
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas
Age: 35
Posts: 9,195
|
Kind of hard to do that since there is nothing to say people can't make files and do what they want with them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
FFR Originalbro
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Age: 35
Posts: 8,751
|
Single releases are fine and can always be posted anytime, but if packs are limited, those few active packs at the time will get more submissions and be completed quicker so everyone can move onto the next pack.
In theory. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
`~`
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,327
|
Quote:
if you fall short of doing any of the above, it's no wonder so many packs are never finished. for every pack I've done, I've never had to ask for submissions, they come in right through the door because I do all of the aforementioned. if you don't care about your own pack, why should anyone else?
__________________
Last edited by Gundam-Dude; 08-15-2013 at 02:44 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 378
|
I just have a... unique perspective/view on music... (However, I have a unique view on everything...) Let me try to explain my thinking a bit...
Back in the old days, you had to use real instruments to create music. At that time, while it was not a new concept, it was becoming popular at that time. Having something 'new' people tend to get... extremely creative. A perfect example is all the inventions we had back then. Now that technology has advanced, we have had music for so long, music tends to ...blend with other songs/music... I had this discussion in school before... Not going into it... The point being is, you can only do something so much/new... Therefore... (This may be the confusion comes in because this is my opinion that I feel is true but not exactly...) You tend to not have anything creative/new in music. Sure, it's impossible to not repeat something/reuse something else. This would cause a lot of people to use old songs but with just new steps. So, with the lack of something creative/new, this tends to cause the questions... "What song should I use? This has already been stepped before... or, this song reminds me of... <X>. I don't want to step this..." While this is not true; to me, it feels like it is... I hope this explains a bit... It's probably just going to confuse you even more... edit: Damn, ninja'ed lol... edit: My brain hurts now... (lol jk) But I gtg so, I'll leave it be here. ~ SpoOkyMagician Last edited by SpoOkyMagician; 08-14-2013 at 07:54 PM.. Reason: GTG |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
V's beta-male entourage
|
Kilgamayan's B.B. Evolution is a requirement
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Dark Chancellor
|
overhyping packs works too even if they suck
see qed packs
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 378
|
...Look, this is getting WAY off topic... I am sorry/regret I even said it... Just forget I said anything...
~ SpoOkyMagician |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
V's beta-male entourage
|
Egg man should be required to have Quasar and One More Lovely
And 12ths OML required |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Can't handle my ÆØÅ
|
Please keep it on topic, if Snapps are busy with IRL stuff and whatnot there isn't much to do other than wait to see if he appears again and post an update or let this thread die. No place to discuss musical taste, please do that somewhere else.
@ Rebirth it's hard to approve/disapprove pack ideas because from what I've seen it's almost impossible from a glance to see if packs will fail or succeed. Take IcyWorld's Nuclear Blast packs as an example, IcyWorld didn't really have any name back in the day, he just basically made the two first packs almost completely by himself and afaik he didn't even make submission threads for them, then he made 3 and 4 and now they're one of the most played packs of all, including outside our english community. Then there's kommisar's Xoon 6 which kinda died, even though the previous Xoon packs were really popular and kommisar is known in more or less all communities the pack project kinda died and kommisar sent all the files to either ODI3 or FFR Community 4, don't remember. So yeah, approving or disapproving will be kinda unfair I think. One small idea could become something big. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|