12-9-2003, 08:38 PM | #41 | ||
FFR Player
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
12-9-2003, 08:39 PM | #42 |
FFR Player
|
googleplex and one
|
12-9-2003, 08:43 PM | #43 | |
FFR Player
|
no, because the number after that is googleplex and 2...that doesnt equal infinty, or can you prove me wrong
__________________
Quote:
|
|
12-9-2003, 08:45 PM | #44 |
FFR Player
|
googleplex and 3, then (lol i'm just messin...
it's googleplex and 4) |
12-9-2003, 08:48 PM | #45 | |||
FFR Player
|
i know, i know...but my post does prove a good point...
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
12-9-2003, 08:51 PM | #46 |
FFR Player
|
yeah...infinity is not a number, it's like saying forward or up...there is no end...it's a concept, not a placeholder for a number
|
12-9-2003, 08:53 PM | #47 |
You thought I was a GUY?!
|
Yes. Time is just the relative rhythm of counting the passage of actions. A BENCHMARK (thanks for the term lupin).
There is nothing physical that can't be quantified; That is true. This is where the whole god thing comes in, and since that is not part of this conversation, infinity stays as a concept and nothing more. The same with counting. There is only mathematics that shows you the concept of infinity: 1 0 Infinity started with math and has never surpassed math. Then again, that concept has a lot of real world applications: The biggest I can think of is derivatives. |
12-9-2003, 08:56 PM | #48 | |
FFR Player
|
so now that is established, lets get back to the....wait what the hell are we talkin about *looks back at previous pages* oh yeah space...and stuff
__________________
Quote:
|
|
12-9-2003, 08:58 PM | #49 |
You thought I was a GUY?!
|
This was a debate about scientific theory, and it seems we finally hit a dead end in where this topic can go.
|
12-9-2003, 08:58 PM | #50 |
FFR Player
|
I think therefor i am.
According to that, I exist in some form, whereas you all are just "nothing"
__________________
Wer noch nie einen Fehler gemacht hat, hat sich noch nie an etwas Neuem versucht. Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) |
12-9-2003, 08:58 PM | #51 |
FFR Player
|
Timeline is really good at exemplifying what we've said and demonstrates a REALLY convincing theory about time travel (previous to that i had thought timetravel was bs)
EDIT: Read the book, not the movie (movie blows) |
12-9-2003, 08:59 PM | #52 |
FFR Player
|
Can one of ya'll jump over to the Sig/Av thread and help me out? Please?
|
12-9-2003, 09:00 PM | #53 |
You thought I was a GUY?!
|
It was good when it lasted though, I want to take this lull to thank everone for all the great thoughts you put into this topic. You guys did a great job.
|
12-9-2003, 09:00 PM | #54 | |
FFR Player
|
Quote:
|
|
12-9-2003, 09:02 PM | #55 |
FFR Player
|
It'd take too much troubl to PM all of those people.
|
12-9-2003, 09:03 PM | #56 | ||
FFR Player
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
12-9-2003, 09:04 PM | #57 |
FFR Player
|
I'd have to say this is one of the most intellectual and thoughtful threads (without arguing) i've seen in a long time
|
12-9-2003, 09:08 PM | #58 |
FFR Player
|
Have ya'll, well specifically Cenright, ever heard of www.sciforums.com ? I used to go there quite frequently. It's awesome if you love talking about this stuff.
|
12-9-2003, 09:08 PM | #59 | |
FFR Player
|
AMEN
__________________
Quote:
|
|
12-9-2003, 09:12 PM | #60 |
FFR Player
|
lol this should be stickied as "the exemplary thread"
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|