WHOO! I won some sort of contest!

[TheRaiRaiEatsBalloons]

Originally Posted by Afrobean

And about the ban evading accounts thing: I just think it's stupid to not ban someone who is OBVIOUSLY someone ban evading, regardless of what the ban was for in the first place or how long ago the ban was put into effect.

If they're actually being funny in doing so and not hurting anything...

Then you'd quite honestly be a goddamned fuckbrained idiot to even care.

There is such a thing is authoritative discresion.

[Afrobean]

Originally Posted by TheRaiRaiEatsBalloons

If they're actually being funny in doing so and not hurting anything...

Irrelevent. If someone does something specifically against the rules just to test the staff, then they don't deserve to ever be back here again.

Then you'd quite honestly be a goddamned fuckbrained idiot to even care.

I've stopped caring about them ban evading. My real problem is that it's so open and that everyone knows.

There is such a thing is authoritative discresion.

Really, now? I was not aware of such a thing.

[TheRaiRaiEatsBalloons]

Rules should never, ever, EVER be exceptionless. It is NOT irrelevent whether or not they're hurting anything by ban-evading, because if they're not hurting anything and are, in fact, contributing to the funny, there's no reason why they shouldn't be posting. If they're being irritating little bastards, there's a problem.

Common sense overrules preset rules. If there's no reason for a rule to be enforced under a certain circumstance, then it shouldn't be.
Rules exist to keep the forum under control. If a rule-breaker isn't threatening the forum, there is no problem.

[ToxicShadow]

If it won't get locked, we'll just have to kill it.

i.e. stop posting here rofl

[sertman]

Hi Afro

Stop being a rules nazi ffs

[Tasselfoot]

locked?

LOL that it took me locking this from an internet cafe in Bulgaria.