12-12-2020, 10:56 AM | #121 |
T-Force's Rival
Join Date: Dec 2010
Age: 27
Posts: 1,865
|
Re: TWG 198 - TWGabout Succession [Postgame Thread]
now there's problems with most of these posts but i think calling out raeko on her shit is and will forever be warranted
sunfan i know i know i KNOW this shit's petty but also c'mon, dude, you and i both know everything i said here is true thanks |
12-12-2020, 11:40 AM | #122 |
Beach Bum Extraordinaire
|
Re: TWG 198 - TWGabout Succession [Postgame Thread]
...Funny literally summoned me here to see her attack Raeko I guess, so I guess I'll say my one post and move on:
Raeko's right. Don't be biased here If you're going to argue, do it in a less "Toxic" way then repeating yourself like a toddler. Hope this was the response you had hoped I guess...? |
12-12-2020, 11:45 AM | #123 |
T-Force's Rival
Join Date: Dec 2010
Age: 27
Posts: 1,865
|
Re: TWG 198 - TWGabout Succession [Postgame Thread]
ohhhhhhhhhh THAT'S WHAT YOU MEANT
boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo |
12-12-2020, 01:53 PM | #124 |
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Don't forget 3.oct.11
Posts: 91
|
Re: TWG 198 - TWGabout Succession [Postgame Thread]
Repeating what you said a bunch of times doesn't make it more true...........
__________________
======== To let the world be. ======== |
12-13-2020, 12:10 AM | #125 |
Your world ends with you
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Somewhere in, B.C., Canada
Age: 32
Posts: 4,738
|
Re: TWG 198 - TWGabout Succession [Postgame Thread]
Thread is being locked for now.
|
12-18-2020, 11:16 PM | #126 |
Your world ends with you
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Somewhere in, B.C., Canada
Age: 32
Posts: 4,738
|
Re: TWG 198 - TWGabout Succession [Postgame Thread]
After a lengthy internal discussion on toxicity, the mod team has sent out several warnings to players regarding their conduct in this thread.
In line with our desire to detoxify community interactions, we are labeling attacks on other players as a toxic interaction that we want to avoid. Criticism is fine, but we ask it to be done in a constructive manner which has not been the case in this thread. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|