05-2-2020, 07:34 PM | #2701 |
the Haku
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 35
Posts: 4,527
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
I also need to think at MML/DBP being W/W now.
|
05-2-2020, 07:34 PM | #2702 |
~ お ま ん こ ~
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
why???
|
05-2-2020, 07:35 PM | #2703 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: On a life-size Flat Earth model
Posts: 149
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
I'm VT too btw
__________________
|
05-2-2020, 07:36 PM | #2704 |
the Haku
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 35
Posts: 4,527
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
Yeah, I need the VT count to see which group as too many of each.
|
05-2-2020, 07:37 PM | #2705 | ||
FFR Player
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 5
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
Quote:
Under 4T scenario, scum would have had to know Mikey's claim was fake. That leaves the question of why scum would fakeclaim under this scenario, as they chose a fakeclaim that would work under the setup. Quote:
More likely possibility: DBP is the scum roleblocker, decided to claim just to try and save himself, as he was near insta twice, including when he made the claim. He was fully not expecting to survive the phase, and the fact that his claim lined up with a possibility is a lucky accident. |
||
05-2-2020, 07:37 PM | #2706 | |
Beach Bum Extraordinaire
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
Quote:
I was starting to have doubts abput Haku last phase and Dusk started trending a little up for me. Haku is also pretty well townread and in the world where wolves know they can only block one of two, they chose most townread of thd bunch. Unless the team is legit Dusk/Bolth/Jessie picking Dusk seems like youre asking to be blocked (i even considered it, but figured you probably would and thinking think stacking would be idea) Haku more or less went straight for "oh it was no kill" instead of a bunch of random theories that also include "roleblockers blocked some roles" and thats slightly sus I dont recall Haku townreading Dusk as hard as he seems to, although i mighta missed that post |
|
05-2-2020, 07:40 PM | #2707 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 5
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
MML, are you 100% certain DBP's claim is real?
|
05-2-2020, 07:40 PM | #2708 |
the Haku
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 35
Posts: 4,527
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
I don't even care about the roleblocks right now.
If you're town you got meme'd. If you're wolf, you're trying to end it with 2 blocks on townies. Priority should be to lock the setup. |
05-2-2020, 07:40 PM | #2709 | |
Beach Bum Extraordinaire
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
Quote:
|
|
05-2-2020, 07:41 PM | #2710 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: On a life-size Flat Earth model
Posts: 149
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
idk? let's say it's a strong feeling for now
the convenient claim of blocking FFA the two thunderdomes with confirmed towns (though granted their shitty plays were not your fault) the lack of classic DBP oomph the general feeling of fuckery in game state and you being one of two names on this list I feel would be able to pull it off don't worry, I'm not gonna go balls to the walls tunnelvision, it just makes the most sense to me rn wrt a solve
__________________
|
05-2-2020, 07:42 PM | #2711 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: On a life-size Flat Earth model
Posts: 149
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
Quote:
__________________
|
|
05-2-2020, 07:43 PM | #2712 |
Beach Bum Extraordinaire
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
No, i would feel better saying that after full claims at this point. For both FFA and DBP to not be roles throws the setup in mad question.
I'm like 90% sure he's town though. Even without claims i think we've been seeing his town game. I dont think its smart to doubt the claim |
05-2-2020, 07:44 PM | #2713 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: On a life-size Flat Earth model
Posts: 149
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
Quote:
can you explain that to me?
__________________
|
|
05-2-2020, 07:46 PM | #2714 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 5
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
Quote:
|
|
05-2-2020, 07:47 PM | #2715 | |
~ お ま ん こ ~
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
Quote:
and you would have to believe that I picked a single-letter fakeclaim instead of the safer double-letter fakeclaim and that I would be willing to sacrifice myself that phase even if I knew mechanically that Mikey was lying and didn't have to fakeclaim at all? and also that I fake softed roleblocker as early as D0 and nothing else, which is the same as committing to a potential 1-letter role which was way more dangerous than a 2-letter role (again) |
|
05-2-2020, 07:49 PM | #2716 | ||
Beach Bum Extraordinaire
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
Quote:
Quote:
And we aint got no SK at this point. But if leetic is right then womp womp. I guess its a decision i have to make with gut on how i feel DBP has played |
||
05-2-2020, 07:51 PM | #2718 | |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: On a life-size Flat Earth model
Posts: 149
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
Quote:
and four Ts still means no serial killer, which seems likely at this point
__________________
|
|
05-2-2020, 07:52 PM | #2719 |
FFR Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: On a life-size Flat Earth model
Posts: 149
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
where'd you soft roleblocker D0?
__________________
|
05-2-2020, 07:52 PM | #2720 |
~ お ま ん こ ~
|
Re: TWG 194 - Game Thread
25% outcome vs. 1% outcome is effectively the same, statistically, because of how the game is rolled
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|