|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Don't forget 3.oct.11
Posts: 93
|
Granted i might be misremembering why you claimed vt but what i do remember is it massively tilted me and it took a lot of effort to ignore it.
Claiming "100% town" is not remotely close to claiming vt
__________________
======== To let the world be. ======== |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
"The Quebec Steparatist."
Join Date: Feb 2011
Age: 35
Posts: 1,974
|
Quote:
Other than this yeah you're right again, my bad. I wouldn't say it wasn't "remotely close", but you're right in that it's at least more open than that.
__________________
Forgot where I put my old sig lol |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Don't forget 3.oct.11
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Incorrect on the 1st point. You are so wrong it is actually staggering
__________________
======== To let the world be. ======== |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
"The Quebec Steparatist."
Join Date: Feb 2011
Age: 35
Posts: 1,974
|
no u
__________________
Forgot where I put my old sig lol |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: May 2017
Age: 34
Posts: 78
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"The Quebec Steparatist."
Join Date: Feb 2011
Age: 35
Posts: 1,974
|
yeah, I know that. It's just that I associated "town" with "vanilla town" in the context of a single user. Nobody says "power role town", it's just implied.
__________________
Forgot where I put my old sig lol |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 12
|
this is semantic and i think doesn't actually matter but i do agree with you. nobody states "town" and means pr, not really anyway
__________________
they/them |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 78 (0 members and 78 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|