TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

[Shadow_God_10]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

reads list incoming

Bruh I'd have a better time reading the Necronomicon in Swedish than coming up with a reads list in this game right now.

[Shadow_God_10]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

Re: Haku's early votes: The execution, and reasoning, might be a little off, but the intention is good and right.

bugkid666

Out of sheer curiosity, why?

If it was the ONLY inactive I could get behind that but you had two to choose from at the time of this post.

Why one and not the other?

[Shadow_God_10]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

Welp....I'm going back to binge Sound Euphonium. I'll check on this later

[bugkid666]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

There is at least one other player who hasn't checked in yet.
A.) How is my vote "valid" versus the others?
B.) How are you making a reads list already not even 24 hours in?

i feel like voting me after my absence despite being excited about the game is valid. everyone else is grasping at straws, but i suppose that's all that can be expected on d0. still.
"""""""reads""""""" as much as reads can be, just what i think about every player so far. haku has certainly given us enough to formulate SOME opinion

[storn42]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

according to the scientific method of random.org, our two wolves are hatredandhatred and hatredandhatred. this will kill two wolves with one lynch and that seems like an easy victory to me.

[mellon_collie]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

I want more spice.

Who do i vote to create spice.

hateandhatred

why'd you pick Hate when he's one of the only people with a vote already on him and also playing the game already....

doesn't seem like a great way to create spice tbh more like just adding to the pot

HELLO BUGKID WELCOME TO THE GAME

[bugkid666]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

bugkid666 - sus
mellonxcollie (raeko) - seems towny but i always read her towny so w/e
Hateandhatred - seems genuine in posts but who knows
Hakulyte - haku be hakuing, i would not be surprised in the slightest if they were wolf
FreezinIce - dunno
storn42 - seems the same, i don't think i can read storn ever
star_crossed - rip
T-Force - have i ever actually played a game with this man?
Shadow_God_10 (Lewdy) - seems normal

tldr, i want y'all to know i am reading posts but obviously there's not a TON to go off of atm. i'm hesitant to vote star bc whenever star's here star is usually very helpful.

[bugkid666]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

HELLO BUGKID WELCOME TO THE GAME

hello raeko my beloved

[roundbox]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

Vote Count
Hateandhatred (3) - Hakulyte, FreezinIce, storn42
bugkid666 (1) - T-Force

[bugkid666]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

is it weird that hatred has 3 votes on him... freezin and storn, could you explain your votes on him a lil more? i think i understand haku's pov so i don't really need another explanation plus they are here for eod

[bugkid666]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

arent*

[mellon_collie]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

is it weird that hatred has 3 votes on him... freezin and storn, could you explain your votes on him a lil more? i think i understand haku's pov so i don't really need another explanation plus they are here for eod

yeah it's kinda weird IMO

maybe people are just being spacey but idk why we need three votes on a person at this point in the game lol

[storn42]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

do i *really* need to explain it?

[Shadow_God_10]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

Of COURSE I leave and that's when stuff gets poppin' off

I just saw the vote count and remembered that Insta is 5....

[Shadow_God_10]

Re: TWG 205 - Zero Active Player Dilemma GAME THREAD

do i *really* need to explain it?

Yes. You do. Now hup to it.