TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

[Charu]

Re: TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

MML, as much as I think your town still, I'm not sure I understand the slightly aggressive response considering you were no where near insta.

I suspect Manti, but goodness, feels like your taking a major offense to his reasoning, lol

[Charu]

Re: TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

That’s all you want to do? That’s not very [twgv]charu[\twgv] of you.

As for this. Sorry, your actions just stuck out more to me as I was here last night, tired, heh.

[Charu]

Re: TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

Freezin sounds good based on where and when they posted. Not enough to say town yet though.

Bug feels fine too, been liking their thoughts all game thus far.

[MixMasterLar]

Re: TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

My reason for voting you wasn't because you were pushing the No Lynch too hard.

Annnnnnnnnd que the line

[twgv]MML[/twg] for now while I get my kiddos to bed for pushing for No lynching which is a bad idea.

So yeah no, you did do that. It's right there. And then you go back on it later which.....you're using the fact you went back on it as reason on why I'm wrong on you going back on it, it seems judging from this:

QUOTE=DarkManticoreX2;4783285]
I voted you because your stance flip was quick and in response to light pressure as I've said before. On D1, active wolves want to interact with the thread and get in good standing with it but don't want to draw too much attention. When I read your No lynch posts, they bothered me because they struck very close to this. You interacted with the idea of a No Lynch and kept it in conversation for quite a while and then backed off with the exact reasons it is a bad idea when Roudbox and mellon came out against it and bugkid also decided it was a bad idea. If you had reasons for liking it then I expected you to at least defend the option a little bit before switching off of it. I probably still wouldn't have liked your stance but at least you would have had a base you were working off of.[/Quote]

Also to note in the above is you denied I defended it after people spoke against it. This is not true as I was defended it against Bugkid about when you made the initial vote. I'm very sure the catalyst for your Post#267 was me defending it! To say I wasn't is clearly incorrect and easily proved so.

QUOTE=DarkManticoreX2;4783285]
If you're mad about the first sentence of 267 (the post where I vote you but mess up my tag). That wasn't directed at you but just general frustration. No Lynch is a bad option unless it mechanically buys us another day or gets us more information and several people were flirting with the idea at the time.[/QUOTE]
This is simply backpedaling. I already quoted this post where you state plainly what the vote was for

[MixMasterLar]

Re: TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

Broken tags broken tags would edit it if I could.

Points stand

@MML can you explain what you mean by freezin swinging of of FFA and onto Juber?

Freezin never had a vote on FFA so I don't know where you're getting this.

I mean swing the wagon over to Jubar, but it is worded as if Freezin had his vote on FFA. That one is on me

MML, as much as I think your town still, I'm not sure I understand the slightly aggressive response considering you were no where near insta.

I suspect Manti, but goodness, feels like your taking a major offense to his reasoning, lol

I find his reasoning is offensive actually, but you always call me too aggressive no matter how much I reel myself back so unless you want to take this somewhere game related, let's save this for post game.

I am more interested in what -you- suspect him, if you are denying or downplaying my case on him. You're being really reactive this game and while that is fine, this is one issue I would like to hear full thoughts on. If you think I'll falling in the tunnel again, bounce some ideas off me instead.

[DarkManticoreX2]

Re: TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

Feels like you want to argue semantics and continue on your D1 Tunnel. You're not solving at this point you're just reinforcing your own thoughts with interpretations that fit your theory. You literally scoped off the entire second part of this thought and outright ignored it.

My reason for voting you wasn't because you were pushing the No Lynch too hard. This is semantical maybe but Bugkid was the one who said you were pushing it too hard in post 270. I expect you to go back and confirm this.

I never said you were pushing hard for it. Emphasis on HARD. I said you were pushing it.

[MixMasterLar]

Re: TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

You said it went a rant and a vote and it was your only point for the vote until you saw you had no support and you got called out

You're defense is that you didn't actually type the word "hard"? Get outta here with that nonsense

[MixMasterLar]

Re: TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

That might work in old school twg or whatever but the town you where so quick to criticize don't roll that way.

You made a vote.
You gave a reason
You contradicted that reason
You left that case to intentionally cause chaos at EOD
You are attempting to re contextual your post
You are trying to hide behind semantics

You are caught.

[DarkManticoreX2]

Re: TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

That might work in old school twg or whatever but the town you where so quick to criticize don't roll that way.

You made a vote.
You gave a reason
You contradicted that reason
You left that case to intentionally cause chaos at EOD
You are attempting to re contextual your post
You are trying to hide behind semantics

You are caught.

I made a vote
I gave a reason
I expanded on that reason
I left that case because there was no wagon developing there and no useful information to be gathered
I am explaining that post in case people don't understand where I was coming from.

Your entire argument is based on an angleshoot because you didn't like that I voted you, put my kids to bed and then gave reasoning for it. There are no contradictions in the posts, you're just doubling down on terrible reasoning and then getting angry that I'm providing reasoning that conflicts with your headspace.

[MixMasterLar]

Re: TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

The contradictions are literally right there, plain as day lmao

No matter how you may say they aren't, they are literally just right there for all the game to see

[Charu]

Re: TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

I am more interested in what -you- suspect him, if you are denying or downplaying my case on him. You're being really reactive this game and while that is fine, this is one issue I would like to hear full thoughts on. If you think I'll falling in the tunnel again, bounce some ideas off me instead.

Don't hate your case, not at all.

I suspect him for his flip flopping as I said. I feel him labeling the two wagons as "meh" and then flip flopping on them was odd.

[MixMasterLar]

Re: TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

Don't hate your case, not at all.

I suspect him for his flip flopping as I said. I feel him labeling the two wagons as "meh" and then flip flopping on them was odd.

Any additional thoughts on my other points?

[Charu]

Re: TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

Your suspicion on roundbox I think isn't bad, but I don't agree with it. That might change depending when he posts this phase. I liked his apprenshion coming into EoD.

[MixMasterLar]

Re: TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

I think rather I come down hard on Roundbox being a wolf versus a town with some bad takes all depends on if he can convince me why he chose Jubar over Lewdy and why he used most of of his to keep commenting superficially on me vs Manti instead of answering questions directed at him.

There's not much more to add until he gets in here

Setting those two aside, I feel like at least one wolf is keeping out of sight and not rocking the boat (100% true if it actually turns out to be Manti+Round) and my instincts go straight to Raeko or Jub to fill that quota for right now. I think the game could benefit from more content from them

[bugkid666]

Re: TWG 203 Werewolves in Avalon GAME THREAD

I don't like responding to important posts like this on mobile but here we go

My reason for voting you wasn't because you were pushing the No Lynch too hard. This is semantical maybe but Bugkid was the one who said you were pushing it too hard in post 270. I expect you to go back and confirm this.

I voted you because your stance flip was quick and in response to light pressure as I've said before. On D1, active wolves want to interact with the thread and get in good standing with it but don't want to draw too much attention. When I read your No lynch posts, they bothered me because they struck very close to this. You interacted with the idea of a No Lynch and kept it in conversation for quite a while and then backed off with the exact reasons it is a bad idea when Roudbox and mellon came out against it and bugkid also decided it was a bad idea. If you had reasons for liking it then I expected you to at least defend the option a little bit before switching off of it. I probably still wouldn't have liked your stance but at least you would have had a base you were working off of.

If you're mad about the first sentence of 267 (the post where I vote you but mess up my tag). That wasn't directed at you but just general frustration. No Lynch is a bad option unless it mechanically buys us another day or gets us more information and several people were flirting with the idea at the time.

Annnnnnnnnd que the line



So yeah no, you did do that. It's right there. And then you go back on it later which.....you're using the fact you went back on it as reason on why I'm wrong on you going back on it, it seems judging from this:

I voted you because your stance flip was quick and in response to light pressure as I've said before. On D1, active wolves want to interact with the thread and get in good standing with it but don't want to draw too much attention. When I read your No lynch posts, they bothered me because they struck very close to this. You interacted with the idea of a No Lynch and kept it in conversation for quite a while and then backed off with the exact reasons it is a bad idea when Roudbox and mellon came out against it and bugkid also decided it was a bad idea. If you had reasons for liking it then I expected you to at least defend the option a little bit before switching off of it. I probably still wouldn't have liked your stance but at least you would have had a base you were working off of.

Also to note in the above is you denied I defended it after people spoke against it. This is not true as I was defended it against Bugkid about when you made the initial vote. I'm very sure the catalyst for your Post#267 was me defending it! To say I wasn't is clearly incorrect and easily proved so.

If you're mad about the first sentence of 267 (the post where I vote you but mess up my tag). That wasn't directed at you but just general frustration. No Lynch is a bad option unless it mechanically buys us another day or gets us more information and several people were flirting with the idea at the time.

This is simply backpedaling. I already quoted this post where you state plainly what the vote was for

i was about to call out manti for contradicting himself but mml did it for me lol

work smarter not harder