Holy wut it is Eva.

[Hakulyte]

Re: Holy wut it is Eva.

((authenticity + technical singing flow * (0.34 + youtube limitations)) / (setup & expectations from audience)) = Ratio of "doing it right" vs approved definition of what it is to "do it right".

Each word have a complex formula of course.

#I don't know what im talking about

[rushyrulz]

Re: Holy wut it is Eva.

7.

[-JiZ53-]

Re: Holy wut it is Eva.

Mathis for idiots. They can't even prove that 1+1=2....what a waste of time

[Hakulyte]

Re: Holy wut it is Eva.

Mathis for idiots. They can't even prove that 1+1=2....what a waste of time

Well, since you're so politely asking us to take your bait, I'll oblige for you.

Maths can prove that in the context of maths "with certain limitations", 1+1=2, but in the context of philosophy, 1+1 could equals whatever you want.

It's objectivity vs subjectivity~

Maths were created for conveniency, not to prove without doubts that one value can only do one thing. It's an open-minded world with its own rules where the goal is to have a system that can be flexible so we can create formulas to solve and make things work and possible (or even to prove that it's impossible with current known knowledge!). You should praise maths, it should have it's own church. The church of science. Now that sounds like something we should all pray for.. I think even FFR could use its own church. I believe we're going to need believers for this site. Who hasn't dreamed that we should all praise and communicate the message of life hidden behind the arrows and such. I mean, most of us already devoted more time than we can count on these truly sacred grounds. You can't deny it. Accept the Jesus of rhythm gaming that is in yourself playing against yourself to improve yourself and become one step closer to absolute truth and authentic love of gaming. \o

Of course, we could use people who can sing as well to make this work.. oh wait- hi Eva! How convenient. That is the destiny, you're just here in time for us. Praise the lord~ \o/

#okay enough brainwashing..

So, 1+1=2 in a standard math context.
..but 1+1 =/= 2 in different context because of limitations/rules/interpretation.

It's all very logical.

That being said, I'm probably an idiot. I could learn a lot from maths, they're definitely for me.

~

I'm posting in chit chat right? Okay, this is chit chat, thank god..

[rushyrulz]

Re: Holy wut it is Eva.

Mathis for idiots. They can't even prove that 1+1=2....what a waste of time

There's actually a 300-page proof of this, most of which is spent defining 1, 2, +, and = rigorously.

[evanescence_death4ever]

Re: Holy wut it is Eva.

I do indeed love what this thread has become. Also, hi rushy!! (^.~)/

[-JiZ53-]

Re: Holy wut it is Eva.

There's actually a 300-page proof of this, most of which is spent defining 1, 2, +, and = rigorously.

Please link it cause Wittgenstein pretty much showed that it cannot be proven because it all rests on assumption(I'm paraphrasing)

[Wayward Vagabond]

Re: Holy wut it is Eva.

Who@

[evanescence_death4ever]

Re: Holy wut it is Eva.

i should sing a math song...

[llyair]

Re: Holy wut it is Eva.

omg you can't mention math songs without Finite Simple Group of Order Two! (just had to say that) <3

Finite Simple Group (of Order Two):

The path of love is never smooth
But mine's continuous for you
You're the upper bound in the chains of my heart
You're my Axiom of Choice, you know it's true

But lately our relation's not so well-defined
And I just can't function without you
I'll prove my proposition and I'm sure you'll find
We're a finite simple group of order two

I'm losing my identity
I'm getting tensor every day
And without loss of generality
I will assume that you feel the same way

Since every time I see you, you just quotient out
The faithful image that I map into
But when we're one-to-one you'll see what I'm about
'Cause we're a finite simple group of order two

Our equivalence was stable,
A principal love bundle sitting deep inside
But then you drove a wedge between our two-forms
Now everything is so complexified

When we first met, we simply connected
My heart was open but too dense
Our system was already directed
To have a finite limit, in some sense

I'm living in the kernel of a rank-one map
From my domain, its image looks so blue,
'Cause all I see are zeroes, it's a cruel trap
But we're a finite simple group of order two

I'm not the smoothest operator in my class,
But we're a mirror pair, me and you,
So let's apply forgetful functors to the past
And be a finite simple group, a finite simple group,
Let's be a finite simple group of order two
(Oughter: "Why not three?")

I've proved my proposition now, as you can see,
So let's both be associative and free
And by corollary, this shows you and I to be
Purely inseparable. Q. E. D.

[r]

Re: Holy wut it is Eva.

hi r emember me?

[choof]

Re: Holy wut it is Eva.

Please link it cause Wittgenstein pretty much showed that it cannot be proven because it all rests on assumption(I'm paraphrasing)

pseudo-intellectual jiz post #153 + TGB post count

[-JiZ53-]

Re: Holy wut it is Eva.

pseudo-intellectual jiz post #153 + TGB post count

If you want to hear about any other philosophers that you've never heard of just send me a pm. I love talking about things I've learned.

[-JiZ53-]

Re: Holy wut it is Eva.

I may have confused some of my ideas though. Godel is also related to what I am talking about... all these guys came from the same time/ genereal area, and all their ideas are related to each other, but I'm no expert on mathmatics, I prefer real things. I was just pointing out that math is pretty much fake and stupid and half of it isn't even proven( I'm paraphrasing here)

[MarioNintendo]

Re: Holy wut it is Eva.

"I'm paraphrasing"
- -JiZ53- 2016