|
|
#11 | ||
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Sep 2014
Age: 50
Posts: 5
|
This aggression is funny! I feel like I might have stepped on a wolf mine or two.
Quote:
I state that we should not vote A for reason X but for reason Y, and I want to vote B for reasons X and Z. You state aha! you cannot say that X is a reason for not A, but X is a reason for B! The problem here is you're doing something called "false equivocation". There is no relation between two arguments. They are separate. X can mean something totally different in the context of Z. Quote:
|
||
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 50 (0 members and 50 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|