TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

huuuuuuge stretch claiming vigi

[cedolad]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

huuuuuuge stretch claiming vigi

then kill me and flip my card.

[AC1speakerbox]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

I'd be easier to believe this wasn't orchestrated if freaky hadn't drawn attention the earlier comment about in-thread wolf hints

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

"im dead anyways so i dont have suspicions or thoughts about anything anymore. gg." said cedolad

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

"or a plan a strategy for the game past day 1, because im totally going to get role blocked, killed, or even lynched or something. fuck everyone you all suck" added cedolad

[cedolad]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

nah I obviously can't defend myself when something gets thrown my way without making an ass of myself. I try to make smarter plays rather than just the usual throw shit into a thread and hope for the best, and I end up in a bigger hole. Not gonna stress myself trying to defend myself over my own stupidity. Have other things to worry about.

and fyi I did have a strategy.

[Vendetta21]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

if your first reaction is to list a bunch of bullshit

I didn't list any bullshit, I literally just pointed out how you must have read my posts previous seeing as you reiterated everything I said about cedolad and how you switched from cedolad to me incredibly fast and how that pace of events was an extremely quick turn and all followed in these oddly precise steps.

Tell me about ac1. Also how do you feel about greens claiming blue?

Greens should almost never claim blue unless it's late game and they are doing so to save a guardian or a vigilante (or something similar) to win the game. Otherwise you should lynch all liars.

At some point AC1 kept a vote on a target when there was someone else he found suspicious who already had 2 votes, which to me goes against the idea that the phase should also be cut short (his suggestion). I find it suspicious because when votes are spread thin wolves can do a pretty good job hiding, and since wolves know what we all think they can use the pressure from phase-end to pick someone, anyone to direct the lynch in their favor when push comes to shove.

It is so easy to call everyone suspicious and vote for them at this stage because you can just wait for the true bandwagon that will kill someone to happen and decide to either be pro or con, but to start a bandwagon takes courage from a human, and knowing you are starting a bandwagon on a human from a wolf (which is a tough position). It's why I call him into question for that act, let me find the post.

http://www.flashflashrevolution.com/vbz/showpost.php?p=3910329&postcount=227

He finds people he could legitimately start a bandwagon on (because they already have two votes) suspicious, but does not. He instead keeps his vote where it is at. Are those suspicions warranted? Does he really believe them? Why isn't he pushing harder for a lynch on the person he is currently voting? Why did he want the phase to end sooner if he wasn't going to change his behaviors? Those are the questions I have.

@fojar, can we replace James May?

[freakysnots]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

V showed panic and surprise when cedo claimed a role. Voting ac1, then carefully responded to my post while not voting for me, then voting for me after seeing how bad it would look if he didn't.

This all seems genuine since if he was a wolf, cedo claiming a role would be expected behaviour, and he would not have reacted in such a way.

[AC1speakerbox]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

You're right about the approach I've been taking. The reasoning behind it was more to see who would jump on the bandwagon though.

I'm not trying to keep the phase short either. The proposed deadline is still a long time from now. I just don't want to miss an opportunity to lynch.

[AC1speakerbox]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

As of this second, I do believe yoman is red. I've just been trying to see who reacts on my suspicion flippantly.

[Crazyjayde]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

It tells others that you can be easily swayed by their opinions, which is obviously bad. Learn to stick to your guns, even if it looks weird.

Yo AC, out of curiosity, are you referencing me?

[AC1speakerbox]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

For the record, I got such a reaction from Zoshi earlier in the game.

[AC1speakerbox]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

Yo AC, out of curiosity, are you referencing me?

I don't remember who all has done it. You seem to be making earnest observations, and I'm just trying to solidify -- in this game with several inexperienced players -- people need to be careful who they trust. You are your greatest asset.

[Crazyjayde]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

For the record, you said that just after I posted an extensive post including subjective perspective on others. With even some over-analyzed stances. Yeah, I'm totally taking it wrongly. Have you even read my post fully?

[Crazyjayde]

Re: TWG XCV: Nobody messes with the frog, see

Didn't even realize you were not responding to me.