Is it wrong to be gay?

[justaguy]

Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

I thought I didn't get my point across properly. I agree with everything you say but I firmly believe that more homo's are homo's for emotional attraction that pedo's are pedo's for emotional attraction. There defiantly are pedophiles who legitimately love children, and I have sympathy for them along with the one who just find kids hawt, but they still shouldn't act upon it for the sole reason because generally, kids aren't old enough to make such a decision. It's not because the sex itself is harmful, it's just society will make that child when he/she grows up feel extreamly violated and regretful. That's a whole other subject there though.

And on the other hand homosexuality has no rational negative consequences.

honestly dude you spelled definitely "defiantly" in this post and the first post in this thread, how can you go a year at your age without knowing that those are two different words? holy ****

[Without A Contraceptive]

Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

next level thinking going on in this thread

[Rubin0]

Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

We are seriously beating a dead horse with this homosexuality versus pedophilia thing. The same opinions are being stated over and over again by the same people.

[rushyrulz]

Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

honestly dude you spelled definitely "defiantly" in this post and the first post in this thread, how can you go a year at your age without knowing that those are two different words? holy ****

Coming from the one who tries to make fun of a serious topic in the correct forum by posting it in his siggy. Get out if you don't have anything serious to say, this isn't the place for idiot trolls like yourself. I'm just going to take a shot in the dark and say you haven't read the majority of this thread. Maybe you should do that before you go and mock it.

[Rubin0]

Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

Coming from the one who tries to make fun of a serious topic in the correct forum by posting it in his siggy. Get out if you don't have anything serious to say, this isn't the place for idiot trolls like yourself. I'm just going to take a shot in the dark and say you haven't read the majority of this thread. Maybe you should do that before you go and mock it.

+1

[fido123]

Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

surprised this isn't locked. is it still a day ban for saying "in before lock?"

Why should it be? Besides for justaguy most of the posts have been well within the rules and

honestly dude you spelled definitely "defiantly" in this post and the first post in this thread, how can you go a year at your age without knowing that those are two different words? holy ****

I catch myself often messing up those two words but I'd read a post with one word spent incorrectly than an entire post about that single word so you can try to feel intelligent or something. Don't bother posting that crap cause nobody gives a ****.

[justaguy]

Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

your points are completely nullified by your inability to spell definitely. the two words aren't even similar enough in definition or pronunciation to where it's possible to confuse them. if you're incapable of correcting this mistake over the course of a year it's safe to assume you're incapable of contributing anything intelligent in general. the implication is that you're unaware.

rushyrulz, i've read the entire thread and really i think it's embarrassing. let me address the topic:

is it wrong to be gay?

the answer is entirely dependent on your definition of wrong

let's define wrong as something that isn't mutually beneficial between those involved. let's address the extremes that either everyone is homosexual, no one is. is homosexuality wrong if no one is homosexual? no. why? because no one is homosexual. given that mutual implies more than one, is it then wrong for one person in an entire population to be homosexual? no, because it is not implied that a homosexual will act on his or her attraction to someone heterosexual, therefore mutuality does not exist and it cannot be defined as wrong. is homosexuality wrong if everyone is homosexual? no. why? because it's mutually beneficial.

let's redefine wrong as the inability to reproduce.

is it wrong to be homosexual? yes, homosexuality is wrong. this doesn't require any elaboration.

we could redefine wrong in a number of contexts allowing you to decide whether homosexuality is right or wrong. ultimately, it doesn't matter.

and that is the end of the thread, seriously. the rest of the discussion is completely irrelevant and serves no purpose. if you draw parallels between pedophilia and homosexuality, that's completely okay, though it accomplishes nothing. and rushyrulz, maybe you should get a brain that isn't mediocre.

Critical Thinking
An area specifically for DumbAsSh*t-level thinkers. Debates, Essays, Politics etc.

[rushyrulz]

Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

Thanks for contributing to the thread, justaguy. Half that post was fine, but take your troll shit elsewhere. There's no denying that you were trolling before, and I have every right to tell you to shut the hell up because this isn't the ****ing place to be an ignorant asshole.

Your serious post didn't have any opinionated information in it, making it next to useless. A bunch of rhetorical questions followed by a nonsense conception of "wrong" constitutes more mediocrity than 'oh that rushy over thur has mediocar brayn'

Like I said before, if you're going to troll in this thread/forum, get out before someone of a higher power needs to step in.

------------
If you want to argue the definition of wrong, it's clearly stated in the dictionary:

1. not in accordance with what is morally right or good

Which is the question at hand here. Wrongly defining wrong doesn't do anything but confuse the argument.

tl;dr: Go play in TGB, justaguy.

[AsphyxZero]

Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

My post was deleted lol looks like I went a bit overboard, so...

If you want to argue the definition of wrong, it's clearly stated in the dictionary:

1. not in accordance with what is morally right or good

You may be able to get the correct definition of wrong, but everyone has different morals. If the word "wrong" is based off of what is not morally right or good, then obviously wrong is going to be used in different ways. Let's take the act of killing someone. As it were right now, I wouldn't kill anyone out of passion or the like because I think it's wrong. Now, I'm willing to bet that someone on earth is killing someone out of passion at this moment. Why? Because they don't think it's wrong.

My brother and I are best friends. He thinks being gay is wrong. I think being gay is alright. He's disgusted by homosexual sex and gay guys flirting with him (which happens all the time lmao), so he sees it in a different way. I've been flirted with by gay guys before, but that's their disposition/choice. I either tell them I'm not gay (nor am I straight but that's irrelevant (kinda)), or I lead them on (which everyone here will probably think is wrong but oh well). I don't see homosexual sex as disgusting. I wouldn't ever do it, but that doesn't mean it's wrong.

[justaguy]

Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

pretty much what darkness said

[rushyrulz]

Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

You may be able to get the correct definition of wrong, but everyone has different morals. If the word "wrong" is based off of what is not morally right or good, then obviously wrong is going to be used in different ways.

Yup, that's what I meant.

[Yieldsign]

Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

Thanks for contributing to the thread, justaguy. Half that post was fine, but take your troll shit elsewhere. There's no denying that you were trolling before, and I have every right to tell you to shut the hell up because this isn't the ****ing place to be an ignorant asshole.

Your serious post didn't have any opinionated information in it, making it next to useless. A bunch of rhetorical questions followed by a nonsense conception of "wrong" constitutes more mediocrity than 'oh that rushy over thur has mediocar brayn'

Like I said before, if you're going to troll in this thread/forum, get out before someone of a higher power needs to step in.

------------
If you want to argue the definition of wrong, it's clearly stated in the dictionary:

1. not in accordance with what is morally right or good

Which is the question at hand here. Wrongly defining wrong doesn't do anything but confuse the argument.

tl;dr: Go play in TGB, justaguy.

"opinionated" information has no place in a critical discussion.

you also seem to be... remarkably unintelligent. how is hayden's conception of "wrong" nonsense? he stated that wrong can be redefined in a number of ways based on context - which is completely true.

[fido123]

Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

I'm honestly not going to even reply to him since he's obviously just trying to piss people off and I suggest everybody else does the same regardless if he has anything of quality in his post. It seems he's trying to veer everything off track by trashing people and this whole forum in a manner where he's not going to look like an obvious troll, but just by pushing everybody's buttons. If you think we're all so dumb why don't you just ****ing leave?

[AsphyxZero]

Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

Yup, that's what I meant.

uh...

If you want to argue the definition of wrong, it's clearly stated in the dictionary:

1. not in accordance with what is morally right or good

Which is the question at hand here. Wrongly defining wrong doesn't do anything but confuse the argument.

Nope, that's not.

[virus003]

Re: Is it wrong to be gay?

your points are completely nullified by your inability to spell definitely. the two words aren't even similar enough in definition or pronunciation to where it's possible to confuse them. if you're incapable of correcting this mistake over the course of a year it's safe to assume you're incapable of contributing anything intelligent in general. the implication is that you're unaware.

rushyrulz, i've read the entire thread and really i think it's embarrassing. let me address the topic:

is it wrong to be gay?

the answer is entirely dependent on your definition of wrong

let's define wrong as something that isn't mutually beneficial between those involved. let's address the extremes that either everyone is homosexual, no one is. is homosexuality wrong if no one is homosexual? no. why? because no one is homosexual. given that mutual implies more than one, is it then wrong for one person in an entire population to be homosexual? no, because it is not implied that a homosexual will act on his or her attraction to someone heterosexual, therefore mutuality does not exist and it cannot be defined as wrong. is homosexuality wrong if everyone is homosexual? no. why? because it's mutually beneficial.

let's redefine wrong as the inability to reproduce.

is it wrong to be homosexual? yes, homosexuality is wrong. this doesn't require any elaboration.

we could redefine wrong in a number of contexts allowing you to decide whether homosexuality is right or wrong. ultimately, it doesn't matter.

and that is the end of the thread, seriously. the rest of the discussion is completely irrelevant and serves no purpose. if you draw parallels between pedophilia and homosexuality, that's completely okay, though it accomplishes nothing. and rushyrulz, maybe you should get a brain that isn't mediocre.

Critical Thinking
An area specifically for DumbAsSh*t-level thinkers. Debates, Essays, Politics etc.

now this guy here is a truly good raised average american

/thread