SM Scores 2006-2010

[Sakish]

Re: SM Scores

i sdcb'd living in a werble not sure if thats good

except that ive been trying to do that since the file came out kill yaself.

[i love you]

Re: SM Scores

ROFL

[Munsie]

Re: SM Scores

Why does that file on rate seem like a really bad idea.

[Fantasticone]

Re: SM Scores


Yay miss.

[Bluearrowll]

Re: SM Scores

c1030

[Fantasticone]

Re: SM Scores

Do a good amount of lurking many pages before this one.

And distant.

[MinaciousGrace]

Re: SM Scores

new york

^5

[Gundam-Dude]

Re: SM Scores

PA is pretty nice. Misses suck. Go for the FC.

[i love you]

Re: SM Scores

lmao

[[TeRa]]

Re: SM Scores

i did pretty good on quasar 1.3

u meen 1.5
nlez ur kneemah

[Gundam-Dude]

Re: SM Scores

Arch

A-A-A-A-Arch

[SgtFish]

Re: SM Scores

Marvelous Attack, meaning your marvelous count vs. perfects and everything else.

That's what I thought. I also thought/think PA = Perfect Attack, but isn't that technically a bad thing?..

[NekoGon]

Re: SM Scores

the lesser your great count, the better your PA!

ps stepmania logic

[mnnicol]

Re: SM Scores

[SgtFish]

Re: SM Scores

the lesser your great count, the better your PA!

ps stepmania logic

Ahh, I get it, the "attacks" aren't based on the name-grade itself, rather the one below it for ratio. (e.g. Marvelous:Perfect, Perfect:Great.. I think. Using that logic is kind of weird though because if you had a a score of, say, 1000; 1; 2; 0; 0; 0, wouldn't that make your "Perfect Attack" bad?.. Like, even though your timing was practically spot-on disregarding 3 steps)

Bah, this thread is making Stepmania more complicated than it needs to be