|
|
#22 |
|
FFR Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 38
Posts: 116
|
1. I know there is X {the amount} in my envelope.
2. The probability that X is the smaller of the two amounts is 1/2, and also it is a 1/2 possibility that it's the larger amount also. 3. The other envelope may contain either 2X or X divided by 2 {1/2X} 4. If X is the smaller amount the other envelope contains 2X, BUT, If X is the larger amount the other envelope contains 1/2X 5. This means, the other envelope contains 2X with the probability 1/2 and 1/2X with probability 1/2 6. So the value of the money in the other envelope is: {1\2} * {2X} + {1\2} * {1\2X} = {5\4}X 7. This is greater than X, so, on average, I gain money by switching 8. After the swap, I can denote that content of the other envelope {Y} and reason in exactly the same way as above 9. I conclude that the most rational thing to do is to swap back again 10. To be rational I will then end up swapping envelopes forever. 11. As it seems more rational to open just any envelope than to swap indefinitely we have a contradiction
__________________
![]()
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|