to be fair, at the time I posted that it was only really BP and charu who had been pursuing the line of thought. Everyone else seemed to feel meh either way on me. You had "gun to head wolf but would need to reread"
I think I'm pretty obviously human due to my content and involvement. Which I think everyone who's played a previous game with me realizes is miles above anything since like (2010?).
I recognize newer players wouldn't be likely to know this, but I think charu and BP would. I also think they'd normally label it just unusual not wolfy.
so given this post of your self-meta
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkManticoreX2
I wouldn't mind seeing people try to give a shot at explaining me. Fiction was the closest player to ever come to understanding how I play.
Personally, I don't think I have a defined meta. I want to win as both alignments and will try to make plays as either team to win the game. Some people try to read me on activity, but my activity will spike or drop in a game depending on time/interest/and team need.
I am exceedingly lethargic when I feel like my team is doing good and very active and at the forefront when I feel like my team is doing bad.
why do you think you providing content and involvement makes you obviously human? because you said yourself you don't think you have a defined meta