TWG 150: Undertale

[TWG Monster Kid]

Originally Posted by TWG Sans

because i was strongly hinting that i was gonna vote for the kid?

you gon' get blasted for this

I went through your EOD posts to see if there was anything that even remotely hinted at dropping a vote on me. Here's what I found:

Originally Posted by TWG Sans

huh, didnt think you fellas would be just as lazy as me

(just posting this here since it's your first post coming into EOD)

Originally Posted by TWG Sans

huh, you must've not noticed all assumptions being made. wouldn't that tickle your tail a little?

Here's a question, but it doesn't smell of "I'M GONNA VOTE FOR YOU" (if you still want me to answer this, you might want to be a bit more specific about which "assumptions" you're comparing this to).

Originally Posted by TWG Sans

what do you think of the kid?

Here's another question, but this feels like garbage since you're not putting anything forth. You're not saying "how do you feel about monster kid's post X", but rather, "hey tell me your thoughts on X, thanks for bullshittin' with me"

Originally Posted by TWG Sans

you can say...

...he doesn't have a grasp on what to do

Your follow-up is a response with no substance whatsoever. Does this count as a strong implication? I'm having doubts. A vote based off of this reaction will feel more like sheeping or gutvoting rather than having any solid basis. ORRRRRRRRR you could be wolf as fuck and put that vote to pres your buddy Doggo. Speaking of Doggo, how did you feel about him at EOD again?

Originally Posted by TWG Sans

yep, but i'll wait for a few

(click on this one to see this is a response to mad dummy saying Doggo was an option for a lynch)

Originally Posted by TWG Sans

i believe at that point in time, it was a vote for the pup to say their words.

looks like it didn't work.

unless you think there was hidden intent in that short post?

why drop the issue br0??

At this point I wouldn't say your vote on me was strongly implied. If anything, it was ambiguous if your vote would have fallen on me or Doggo. Perhaps if you posted some rationale BEFORE YOUR VOTE instead of making boring jabs or extremely open-ended questions, it would have been a little more believable. Hell, you even criticized Papyrus with a pun, so don't even try to spin it that your pun against me was in your favor.

*more prunez*