|
|
#11 | |
|
FFR Player
|
Pretty much what I was getting at. Wavedashing is gone and behind everyone now--it's irrelevant whether or not it was intended, whether it was a glitch or exploit, etc. However, thanks to wavedashing (or more specifically, its removal and the reasons behind it), we now know how gaming companies are evolving. The casual (sometimes called "social") gamer demographic is growing and growing, while the hardcore (sometimes referred to as "competitive" though one doesn't necessarily imply the other) gamer demographic is remaining fairly stagnant.
The number of people who will buy a $50 game to pick up and play a simple, fun social activity is far, far greater than the number of people who will buy a deep, complex game with tons of nuances that can greatly affect gameplay. As game companies shift to developing for these people, there's a very likely possibility that the hardcore gamer will get the shaft. There's more money to be made in the social gaming market, after all. This is what worries me. I can't enjoy casual/social games. I just can't. I need depth, intricacy, complexity, to truly get the rush out of gaming that is the reason I play. If companies develop for a larger market at the cost of these things, video gaming may eventually no longer be entertaining for me. I'm sure others share this sentiment as well. If nothing else, the future of the gaming industry as gaming becomes more widespread is worth discussing, though that would be better done in a different thread. If there's enough interest, I'll go ahead and make one. Quote:
Also, yes, everyone has lost to the AI at one point. And I agree that people should just play how they want to. Those on the competitive side who try to "cram [their] playstyle down other people's throats" are the vocal minority. And I'm sure the same is true for the other side as well. |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 10 (0 members and 10 guests) | |
|
|