Go Back   Flash Flash Revolution > General Discussion > Critical Thinking
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-13-2004, 03:27 PM   #1
FishFishRevolution
GotR Creator
Retired StaffFFR Veteran
 
FishFishRevolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vi sitter här i venten Current Band: The National
Age: 38
Posts: 7,251
Send a message via AIM to FishFishRevolution Send a message via Yahoo to FishFishRevolution Send a message via Skype™ to FishFishRevolution
Default Responsibility vs Independence

I was thinking about this the other day, when does a person have the right to choose for him/herself?
People should idealy make decisions bearing consequences that affect themselves. They should be able to make those decisions if they can accept the consequences, right? But what if the person is not old enough or mature enough to understand the effects of their decisions? Someone should guide them, right? Or limit their decision making powers...?
What if, they understand the consequences to themselves, but they don't factor in the consequences to other people, or the environment, or anything else? Should that power be once again limited? And by whom? Who has the unclouded clear judgement to make that call?
One last thing, what about decisions made by people, who's consequences harm themselves? This then affects people who love them, so is that not a consequence for others as well?

WHERE DO WE DRAW THE LINE?!
__________________
FishFishRevolution is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright FlashFlashRevolution