|
|
#11 |
|
FFR Veteran
|
@ Devonin
I definitely see what you're saying, I still think the way I'm going to do it works just as fine. For the player Hall of Fame, we're going to first do research. Looks at the achievements set by players that first come to mind via threads, archives, etc. Gather up a list of players that seem "induction worthy based on the time period", and categorize them by age. We're not going to be placing people in order of how good they are, rather by when they should be inducted. I asked everyone to look for when each player was at the prime of their game, or rather, at what point in time the player should have been inducted. Considering we're doing it like this, we are still able to induct active players at a certain time period. With each person we induct, we'll list a small amount of information for why they were inducted, followed by whether or not they are active or not. For active players that are inducted, each time this list gets updated, we can just add more to the information next to their name (if other things are worth recognizing). As for the other types of Hall of Fame categories, we're not going to need judges. I'll be holding polls for each category. We're hoping to have the Player HoF done by around the 7th, and the rest of the HoF categories done before 2008. I'd actually like to release the actual entire list New Years Eve; every category and the other things we'll be adding to it. This gives about 3 weeks for polls, and I'll figure out how long each will last/how many there will be after the PHoF is done. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests) | |
|
|