Nocilol

[ToshX]

Originally Posted by devonin

By the same application of the law, if ones parents ever took a picture of you as an infant in the bathtub, or as a little kid running around without your diaper on, they are technically in possession of child porn.

There was actually a case not too long ago where a (i think she was 15? 16?) girl was charged with possession of child pornography for having nude photos of -herself-

Well yeah, I'm not saying it has to be like, you know, all over websites and stuff. Do I think it'd help STOP people from raping kids and stuff? Well, in many cases, yes, and I think even in the majority of cases.

Originally Posted by Shashakiro

I'm totally with Guido on real CP (for <16, anyway).

Yeah, I'm including everyone up through 17 to be considered kids.

As for what Kilga quoted, I'm pretty much saying the opposite of the first part of the statement in that sentence.

As for Shash, I see why some people could consider it a "life ruining experience", but I think it's no more of one than if someone were to do it when they were, say, 18. Well yeah, obviously 18 year olds are going to make better decisions, though, so maybe I should change my argument to saying they should be allowed to make it with parental consent. Now, you may ask, "who the hell would allow their child..." etc. Well, surprisingly, there are a considerable number who would. I mean yeah, it'd be a minority of people, but still a considerable amount.

Parents already greatly change the lives of their children everyday. If a parent decides it will not damage the child in a considerable way, I see no problem with it.

I mean yeah, you wouldn't've seen my parents allowing that and I wouldn't allow it for my kids, but then again, it's far from likely that I'll ever engage in(as in actually help in the creation of) any kind of porn anytime in my life. Not everyone thinks the same way as I do, though.