lovely cynic

[Privateer]

Everyone calls it Chopin, though...

[Arch0wl]

I don't believe these at all, mainly because of the cynic score

[banditcom]

You don't believe much of anyone, now do you Arch?

[eVILPeeR]

Nope.
He doesn't. I was actually there when Linus AA'd Cynic (not at his house, but on MSN).
BTW: Arch0wl can't do this.. so obviously it's BS. Hah.

[Moogy]

51 greats but basically no misses on Cynic? 92 million points? That is bullshit.

[eVILPeeR]

There were quite a few misses on there, Moogy.
And getting low greats is easy. Hell, I got like 70 something the other day.. and Linus is quite a bit better then me.

[Moogy]

2 misses is not "quite a few". Goods and boos don't matter on Cynic, you'll always get them on the 16ths. And 51 greats isn't low. It's fairly high, which is why I doubt he would have so few misses.

[Arch0wl]

I was actually there when Linus AA'd Cynic (not at his house, but on MSN).

OMG THAT MAKES IT ALL THE MORE CREDIBLE

Just because I can't do something doesn't mean I doubt it. It depends on the score and the song. I can't AAA Snow, but I know a Snow AAA is possible, and if someone does it I might doubt it depending on who it is and their attitude toward it but generally it's possible.

Also the fact that,






get ready for this,






None of the "good" players have supplied concrete proof besides myself, Jello, and Hyro.

(Hyro because I know one of his better friends in person, Jello showed me ini and judge difficulty over webcam, plus all his scores are doable)

[eVILPeeR]

Nima made Videos, and a lot of them Arch0wl.
It shows his fingers and the screen. How is that not concrete proof?

[altairian]

Arch, moogy, keep it to yourself, honestly. We don't give a fuck if you believe the scores or not. How about you offer us some concrete proof that the scores AREN'T legit before you open your damn mouth about it again kthx

[Arch0wl]

Nima made Videos, and a lot of them Arch0wl.
It shows his fingers and the screen.

Show me.

Every video he's made has either been the fingers, or the screen. The only video I can recall had both was the OMW ffr video, and that didn't prove shit.

How about you offer us some concrete proof that the scores AREN'T legit

SUP 2 MISSES ON CYNIC

[altairian]

hi mash with 4 fingers it's not that hard to hit a lot of arrows. just cause you can't do it with indexes doesn't mean it's not possible x.x

[Arch0wl]

hi mash with 4 fingers it's not that hard to hit a lot of arrows. just cause you can't do it with indexes doesn't mean it's not possible x.x

altairian you have no idea what you are talking about. You can't mash the end of cynic with four arrows and get 2 misses, it doesn't work like that. After a certain speed of mashing 4 arrows, SM does this anti cheating thing and doesn't register them. You are not that good at SM, so you have no right to go on backing up the credibility of scores when someone MUCH MUCH better than you calls BS on them.

Edit: By the way...

You, Reach, and a few other people need to get off that shit that you're on that makes you think that whenever I criticise something it's because I can't do it with index's. Stop giving me guilt trips about my play style. The majority of people (excluding supposed "good" people on here, who have not shown concrete proof) either play one handed or with three fingers on two hands. It's natural for people to play with about 2/3 of their fingers on the keys, which is why an extremely large amount of people use 5 or so fingers for IIDX. When I criticise a score, it has nothing to do with play style.

[Reach]

I got like 6-7 misses on cynic if I recall once. The combo breakers :< and the ending always gives me a bunch.

2 misses MIGHT be possible...but if he did do it, it would be like jellos gabber pass and pure fu cking luck.

[altairian]

Whatever arch. Pull the stick out, put the superiority complex aside, and maybe you'll be worth talking to in the future. Heck maybe some people would actually respect you if you did that