OWNED! quasar 1.6 - Page 2

Nima · 12-2-2004, 09:01 AM

sdg it if you play 4 fingers XD

Ignite · 12-2-2004, 09:03 AM

You sdg'ed it Nima? Wtf. Thats sick.

Izzi · 12-2-2004, 09:53 AM

omg that is crazy.... those jumps are impossible for me >.< then those jacks... i normally fail there

Arch0wl-R2 · 12-2-2004, 12:45 PM

izzi, I really doubt you could A quasar 1.6, and almost
pass quasar 1.7, both with indexes, and not be able to FC it on 1.5, especially after your reality score on FFR. Quasar 1.6 is 248 bpm, which is only 11 bpm away from reality. Quasar 1.7 is 263.7, which is faster than reality and a constant speed. I've played both quasar and reality, on a as jk setup and on fast speeds quasar is much harder for four fingers than FFR reality is, at least for me. if you're playing indexes, then you would be able to get a much better FFR reality score.

Izzi · 12-2-2004, 02:05 PM

ffr is so off beat... but ill go try it again... plus those back and forth comboes are hard for me... they shouldnt be ill practice it

i can ace reality on stepmania and ace quasar 1.6... seems fair

Anuj · 12-2-2004, 03:15 PM

Reality is way easier then quasar 1.6 IMO... lol

Arch0wl-R2 · 12-3-2004, 12:17 AM

it is, anuj

izzi, you could just mute the music. it wouldn't make a difference, I don't even pay any attention to the music when I play reality.

Nima · 12-3-2004, 09:37 AM

quasar 1.6 and reality were about the same difficulty to AAA although quasar 1.6 took me longer. I think quasar 1.6 is slightly harder imo though since it is really constant. And I sdg'd guillaume tell oni along time ago but remember I had a number of misses. So it wasn't fc obviously.

Arch0wl's R2 argument isn't the best as it runs horrible/lags/lowfps/offbeat etc. on some computers HOWEVER he makes a very valid argument concerning quasar 1.6/1.7 as on INDEX 1.6 and 1.7 are MUCH harder than 1.5 and one would likely be able to atleast get close to an fc on 1.5 with good PA/MA if they would do really well on 1.6/1.7 rate. Plus, he didn't even post an in-game ss...

Izzi · 12-3-2004, 12:51 PM

thats why i play dark mode arch

12-2-2004, 09:01 AM	#21
Nima FFR Player Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 3,526	sdg it if you play 4 fingers XD __________________ DELETE THIS ACCOUNT

12-2-2004, 09:03 AM	#22
Ignite FFR Player Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: hi guys Posts: 986	You sdg'ed it Nima? Wtf. Thats sick. __________________ -Pat

12-2-2004, 03:15 PM	#26
Anuj FFR Player Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 5,998	Reality is way easier then quasar 1.6 IMO... lol __________________

12-3-2004, 09:37 AM	#28
Nima FFR Player Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 3,526	quasar 1.6 and reality were about the same difficulty to AAA although quasar 1.6 took me longer. I think quasar 1.6 is slightly harder imo though since it is really constant. And I sdg'd guillaume tell oni along time ago but remember I had a number of misses. So it wasn't fc obviously. Arch0wl's R2 argument isn't the best as it runs horrible/lags/lowfps/offbeat etc. on some computers HOWEVER he makes a very valid argument concerning quasar 1.6/1.7 as on INDEX 1.6 and 1.7 are MUCH harder than 1.5 and one would likely be able to atleast get close to an fc on 1.5 with good PA/MA if they would do really well on 1.6/1.7 rate. Plus, he didn't even post an in-game ss... __________________ DELETE THIS ACCOUNT

12-2-2004, 09:53 AM	#23
Izzi FFR Player Join Date: Nov 2003 Age: 36 Posts: 2,142	omg that is crazy.... those jumps are impossible for me >.< then those jacks... i normally fail there

12-2-2004, 12:45 PM	#24
Arch0wl-R2 FFR Player Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 143	izzi, I really doubt you could A quasar 1.6, and almost pass quasar 1.7, both with indexes, and not be able to FC it on 1.5, especially after your reality score on FFR. Quasar 1.6 is 248 bpm, which is only 11 bpm away from reality. Quasar 1.7 is 263.7, which is faster than reality and a constant speed. I've played both quasar and reality, on a as jk setup and on fast speeds quasar is much harder for four fingers than FFR reality is, at least for me. if you're playing indexes, then you would be able to get a much better FFR reality score.

12-2-2004, 02:05 PM	#25
Izzi FFR Player Join Date: Nov 2003 Age: 36 Posts: 2,142	ffr is so off beat... but ill go try it again... plus those back and forth comboes are hard for me... they shouldnt be ill practice it i can ace reality on stepmania and ace quasar 1.6... seems fair

12-3-2004, 12:17 AM	#27
Arch0wl-R2 FFR Player Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 143	it is, anuj izzi, you could just mute the music. it wouldn't make a difference, I don't even pay any attention to the music when I play reality.

12-3-2004, 12:51 PM	#29
Izzi FFR Player Join Date: Nov 2003 Age: 36 Posts: 2,142	thats why i play dark mode arch

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)