06-30-2005, 10:48 PM | #1 |
FFR Originalbro
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Age: 33
Posts: 8,750
|
jTWG VIII Postgame
akorn [Lynched Day 4]
daniel_lewis20 [Killed Night 3] ddr_dude [Lynched Day 4] Demon_Of_The_Comet [Killed Night 1] mattc16 [Lynched Day 2] MAXANOiA/Tps222 [Killed Night 4] NightSonnett [Killed Night 4] pntballa18 [Lynched Day 1] psychic25 [Killed Night 2] PsYcHoZeRoSk8eR [Won the game] scorpio1690 [Lost the game] Tasuke [Killed Night 2] vashthestampede0987 [Killed Night 3] All I could say for this game is, lol. What was wrong with you all? Every person had at least one phantom, about half with two phantoms. The lack of activity in this game was horrible. No offence to our new players though, I can see how they didn't really know what to do. I'm sure you all wanted to keep jTWG alive, I'm sure this game will put an end to jTWG. |
06-30-2005, 10:50 PM | #2 |
Network Security Analyst
|
RE: jTWG VIII Postgame
BRAVO BRAVO, i can't believe that i won.
only thing i have to say is sorry to demon for killing twice , vash was supposed to die and since you took his place, you also took his death. |
06-30-2005, 10:51 PM | #3 |
FFR Originalbro
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Age: 33
Posts: 8,750
|
RE: jTWG VIII Postgame
I wanted to make this game hard, so why not let someone be wolf two games in a row? Many people don't expect the same person to be a wolf two games in a row.
|
06-30-2005, 10:54 PM | #4 | |||
FFR Player
|
RE: jTWG VIII Postgame
Id like to say you all are dumbasses. If anyone read last game or saw last postgame, you would see that Psycho was mad cuz i let him get wolfed and didnt try to save him. Wolfing night 1 proved it, then the SAME NIGHT I WAS BROUGHT BACK i was wolfed again.
Shame on you SHAME ON YOU ALL!!!
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
06-30-2005, 11:05 PM | #5 |
Network Security Analyst
|
RE: jTWG VIII Postgame
Demon, im not mad at you for having me wolfed last game, seriously im not - we won so it helped a little. If anything, it was to keep you away from me because you knew how I wolfed/ like to wolf. But i agree with you, come on people i wasn't that good, I'm not that good at this game.
|
07-1-2005, 12:15 AM | #6 |
FFR Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orange County
Posts: 334
|
And you all thought it was me. Hah.
__________________
My computer hates me. /gquit |
07-1-2005, 06:42 AM | #7 |
FFR Player
|
You all piss me off to hell. I'd rather play TWG with 5 year old Yu Gi Oh Fan boys.
|
07-1-2005, 06:47 AM | #8 |
FFR Player
|
I agree with Vash on this one, you n00b players (with exception to demon, psycho, tps and psychic) should be banned for your inactivity. But that's just my opinion.
|
07-1-2005, 07:34 AM | #9 |
FFR Player
|
i was as active as i could be until i was killed. and id like to apologise (to dan particularly) for my stupid comments in my first jTWG chat.
gg though psycho |
07-1-2005, 08:20 AM | #10 |
FFR Player
|
gah, went to bed last night and was like ''holy shit, pyscho's the wolf, im going to die''. I was hoping the game didn't end, but it did. Great job pyscho. Now, jTwg should neve be played again. Take a few of good players and move them up. The rest of them, screw em. They don't play, and when they do they suck. Theres such a huge gap between the two, it gives most people no chance of moving up. I want to see some phantom bans dish'd out.
|
07-1-2005, 09:49 AM | #11 | |
FFR Player
|
Quote:
|
|
07-1-2005, 10:07 AM | #12 | ||
FFR Player
|
Quote:
__________________
Mead is a | ******. | |
||
07-1-2005, 10:24 AM | #13 |
FFR Player
|
Ugh. At least Day One went... well... :P but decent for a Day 1, I thought- there were chats, at least. The rest was HORRIBLE- I must say, DO NOT SIGN UP if you can't be active AT LEAST once per day.
Yeah, I'm thinking jTWG needs to be scrapped. It was an interesting experiment, but I think times have changed. A spot in the regular TWG seems to be obtainable for some of the non-regulars now, as the signups always seem to have two or three spots open at the end of the second wave. If new players are really eager about this, they'll be competitive for those last few spots, and (hopefully) it'll get players who will contribute more. Plus, newbies playing in regular TWG actually do seem to do better overall. In short, I don't see a need to continue with two games. The craze seems to be settling, the demand for spots isn't as high anymore... I think we can squeeze everybody into one game. Unless there are any objections? Maybe later, if there seems to be another large wave of people who really want to play TWG, we can reinstate it. |
07-1-2005, 11:10 AM | #14 |
FFR Player
|
That's a good idea. Though, I do think we need to start rejecting players from TWG all-together. There need to be a lot more perma-bans, letting anyone in isn't a good idea. If your not going to devote yourself to the game, then leave. I'm telling you, TWG is MUCH harder, and requires much more participation. So, just wait until the current TWG is over, then we'll go from there.
|
07-1-2005, 12:25 PM | #15 |
new hand moves = dab
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: he/they
Age: 33
Posts: 10,094
|
I would like to start out with "not to take anything away from Psycho", but I can't. Psycho did very well for himself, and he's never even been a human. He definitely deserved to win over the rest of you. However, he really shouldn't have won. In Manhunt, one little screwup and you're done. Psycho made more than that. The fact that Psycho didn't get picked out is rather sad. Still, great job to Psycho, as he obviously put in more effort than most everyone else.
I do think jTWG should be abolished, but there are some players that should be left out. TPS already said most of what I wanted to say, though I think the solution is not to deal out permabans, but to let the rules go into effect. TWC decided awhile ago that the host got to pick if a player got in a game. I think this is a sufficient way of going about sorting who gets in TWG. |
07-1-2005, 01:46 PM | #16 |
FFR Player
|
I like the idea that Danceguy brought up. That way, the host can choose whether or not to allow a player to play, based on their history. They get to choose whether or not to give the person a second chance (if the person signs up again).
Of course, the host shouldn't be able to reject a person out of spite. They should only be able to be rejected if their history contains such cardinal sins as inactivity and the like. Oh, and good job psycho. EDIT: Spelling. |
07-1-2005, 02:10 PM | #17 |
FFR Player
|
Wait, what do we do about first time players? How are they judged?
|
07-1-2005, 02:27 PM | #18 |
Network Security Analyst
|
First time players should get a test of some sort, like be tested by TWC for things like inactivity.
|
07-1-2005, 02:32 PM | #19 |
FFR Player
|
Meh, I was smart and I quit because I was sick of it. I say we have the TWC check on players in jTWG and see if they're qualified, I know I'm probably not one of those select few, but it's better to not play then play a shitty game.
|
07-1-2005, 02:54 PM | #20 |
FFR Player
|
See the problem was that everyone said"meh, it's only jTWG , no big deal". This caused everyone to become innactive. I don't know why people think that if they don't try in jTWG that somehow they will be allowed in TWG.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|